Feasibility of increasing physical activity levels of hospitalized cancer survivors using goal setting and feedback (CanFit): a randomized controlled trial

被引:0
作者
Dennett, Amy M. [1 ,2 ]
Harding, Katherine E. [1 ,2 ]
Peiris, Casey L. [1 ,3 ]
Goodwin, Victoria A. [4 ]
Hahne, Andrew [1 ]
Liedtke, Sabrina [5 ]
Wragg, Katrina [6 ]
Parente, Phillip [6 ,7 ]
Taylor, Nicholas F. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] La Trobe Univ, Sch Allied Hlth Human Serv & Sport, Bundoora, Australia
[2] Eastern Hlth, Allied Hlth Clin Res Off, Box Hill, Australia
[3] Royal Melbourne Hosp, Dept Allied Hlth, Parkville, Australia
[4] Univ Exeter, Fac Hlth & Life Sci, Exeter, England
[5] Goethe Univ, Inst Sports Sci, Frankfurt, Germany
[6] Eastern Hlth, Dept Canc Serv, Box Hill, Australia
[7] Monash Univ, Eastern Hlth Clin Sch, Box Hill, Australia
关键词
Cancer; Physical activity; Behaviour change; Hospital; BED REST; EXERCISE; BEHAVIOR; DESIGN; HEALTH; OLDER;
D O I
10.1016/j.physio.2025.101776
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objectives This trial aimed to provide estimates of effect and feasibility of a physical activity intervention for hospitalized cancer survivors using smartwatches for goal-setting and feedback. Design A feasibility, single-blinded, randomized trial. Setting Acute cancer unit in a tertiary hospital. Participants Adult hospitalized cancer survivors undergoing cancer treatment (n = 24). Interventions Participants were randomized to usual care or 2 sessions of a behavioural intervention using goal setting and feedback. Main outcome measures Blinded assessments occurred at admission (T0), discharge (T1) and 4-weeks post-discharge (T2). The primary outcome was accelerometer-measured daily step count and sedentary time. Secondary measures evaluated feasibility (demand, implementation, acceptability, practicality), mobility, self-efficacy, and health service outcomes. Results The trial was hampered by low recruitment rate (n = 24, 29% of target). There were moderate estimates of effect favouring the experimental group for mobility at T1 (mean difference [MD] 11 points, 95% CI -1 to 22). No other effects favored the experimental group. Estimates of step counts (T1 MD -284, 95% CI -1491 to +943; T2 -2249, 95% CI -6062 to +1565) and sedentary time (T1 MD +0.9 hours, 95% CI +0.1 to +2; T2 +2.8 hours, 95% CI -0.3 to +5.2) favored the usual care group. There was no difference in health service outcomes. The intervention was well accepted and no adverse events occurred. Conclusion A physical activity intervention for cancer survivors admitted to hospital was safe and acceptable but slow recruitment and uncertainty surrounding its efficacy hampered trial feasibility. Future trials should consider whole-of-ward interventions using novel trial designs.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, WORLD ALLIANCE PATIE
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, NCI Dictionary of Cancer Terms - National Cancer Institute
[3]   Prehabilitation and acute postoperative physical activity in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: a secondary analysis from an RCT [J].
Au, Darren ;
Matthew, Andrew G. ;
Lopez, Paty ;
Hilton, William J. ;
Awasthi, Rashami ;
Bousquet-Dion, Guillaume ;
Ladha, Karim ;
Carli, Franco ;
Santa Mina, Daniel .
SPORTS MEDICINE-OPEN, 2019, 5 (01)
[4]  
Bandura A., 1997, Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
[5]   How We Design Feasibility Studies [J].
Bowen, Deborah J. ;
Kreuter, Matthew ;
Spring, Bonnie ;
Cofta-Woerpel, Ludmila ;
Linnan, Laura ;
Weiner, Diane ;
Bakken, Suzanne ;
Kaplan, Cecilia Patrick ;
Squiers, Linda ;
Fabrizio, Cecilia ;
Fernandez, Maria .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2009, 36 (05) :452-457
[6]   One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? [J].
Braun, Virginia ;
Clarke, Victoria .
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 18 (03) :328-352
[7]   A guide to assessing physical activity using accelerometry in cancer patients [J].
Broderick, J. M. ;
Ryan, J. ;
O'Donnell, D. M. ;
Hussey, J. .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2014, 22 (04) :1121-1130
[8]   Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus Statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable [J].
Campbell, Kristin L. ;
Winters-Stone, Kerri M. ;
Wiskemann, Joachim ;
May, Anne M. ;
Schwartz, Anna L. ;
Courneya, Kerry S. ;
Zucker, David S. ;
Matthews, Charles E. ;
Ligibel, Jennifer A. ;
Gerber, Lynn H. ;
Morris, G. Stephen ;
Patel, Alpa V. ;
Hue, Trisha F. ;
Perna, Frank M. ;
Schmitz, Kathryn H. .
MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS & EXERCISE, 2019, 51 (11) :2375-2390
[9]   Sample size calculations for pilot randomized trials: a confidence interval approach [J].
Cocks, Kim ;
Torgerson, David J. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 66 (02) :197-201
[10]  
Coker RH, 2014, J GERONTOL A-BIOL, V69, P363, DOI [10.1093/gerona/glu123, 10.1093/gerona/glt100]