Life cycle assessment research and application in Nigeria

被引:0
|
作者
Isah, Mohammed Engha [1 ]
Wasah, Ayedu [2 ]
Matsubae, Kazuyo [1 ]
机构
[1] Tohoku Univ, Grad Sch Environm Studies, 468-1 Aramaki Aza Aoba,Aoba Ku, Sendai 9808572, Japan
[2] Nasarawa State Univ Keffi NSUK, Fac Environm Sci, PMB 1022, Keffi, Nigeria
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT | 2025年
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Nigeria; Review; LCA; Sustainability; Environment; MUNICIPAL SOLID-WASTE; ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT; WATER TREATMENT; ELECTRICITY; GENERATION; POLLUTION; SYSTEMS; SECTOR;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-024-02423-6
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
PurposeLife cycle assessment (LCA) methodology is becoming increasingly popular in developing countries, however, challenges such as lack of local data, spatial and temporal differentiation of impact categories, and uncertainty in the data and impact assessment methods remain. In this comprehensive review, we systematically conduct a literature review of LCA research in Nigeria, including a thorough assessment of the LCA studies according to ISO 14040 and 14044 standards.MethodsA total of 30 peered reviewed and conference papers on LCA papers Nigeria as the study area of authors affiliated to institutions in the country were assessed. The assessment focused on functional unit, system boundary, data quality, allocation, impact assessment methods, database and LCA software used and interpretation methods.Results and discussionThe results of the review showed that LCA is still in its infancy in Nigeria with 30 papers on the subject matter published between 2010-2023. These peer reviewed publications came from universities and research institutions, none from companies or government. In terms of the methodological choices, different functional units, system boundaries, impact assessment methods, allocation, data choices, databases and software were used. The Ecoinvent database is one of the most widely used for background data for potential environmental impacts while SimaPro and GaBi are the softwares of choice for most of the studies. Climate Change was the most assessed impact category at the midpoint level for life cycle impact assessment (LCIA). To ensure that uncertainties in LCA results are reduced, studies should ensure transparency in inventories, consider all the life cycle stages, use primary data and adapt local characterisation factors. Local impacts such as gas flaring, biodiversity, oil spills, soil erosion, and desertification should be the focus of LCA method developers in Nigeria as they are the prevailing environmental challenges affecting different parts of the country.Conclusions and recommendationsDifferent methodological choices are used by researchers, they highlight a challenge that was noticeable in all the papers - a general lack of primary data. The studies are not equally distributed amongst the sectors of the economy. Most of them are concentrated in the agriculture, energy and transportation sectors. Based on our findings, the authors recommend the development of an LCI database for Nigeria and Nigeria-specific impact pathways, normalisation and weighting factors to enhance the reproducibility of the results. This study lays the foundation for the development of an integrated master plan for the development of LCA in Nigeria, with the potential to significantly contribute to improving environmental assessment and sustainable development.
引用
收藏
页码:880 / 895
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Life cycle assessment of a wind farm in Turkey
    Ozsahin, Buse
    Elginoz, Nilay
    Germirli Babuna, Fatos
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (47) : 71000 - 71013
  • [2] Exergetic Life Cycle Assessment: A Review
    Nwodo, Martin N.
    Anumba, Chimay J.
    ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (11)
  • [3] Review: life cycle assessments in Nigeria, Ghana, and Ivory Coast
    Maepa, Mpho
    Bodunrin, Michael Oluwatosin
    Burman, Nicholas W.
    Croft, Joel
    Engelbrecht, Shaun
    Ladenika, A. O.
    MacGregor, O. S.
    Harding, Kevin G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2017, 22 (07): : 1159 - 1164
  • [4] Life Cycle Assessment of Aquaculture Feed and Application to the Turbot Sector
    Iribarren, D.
    Moreira, M. T.
    Feijoo, G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2012, 6 (04) : 837 - 848
  • [5] Application of life cycle assessment to chemical processes
    Burgess, AA
    Brennan, DJ
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2001, 56 (08) : 2589 - 2604
  • [6] Principles for the application of life cycle sustainability assessment
    Valdivia, Sonia
    Backes, Jana Gerta
    Traverso, Marzia
    Sonnemann, Guido
    Cucurachi, Stefano
    Guinee, Jeroen B.
    Schaubroeck, Thomas
    Finkbeiner, Matthias
    Leroy-Parmentier, Noemie
    Ugaya, Cassia
    Pena, Claudia
    Zamagni, Alessandra
    Inaba, Atsushi
    Amaral, Milena
    Berger, Markus
    Dvarioniene, Jolanta
    Vakhitova, Tatiana
    Benoit-Norris, Catherine
    Prox, Martina
    Foolmaun, Rajendra
    Goedkoop, Mark
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2021, 26 (09): : 1900 - 1905
  • [7] Municipal solid waste: Review of best practices in application of life cycle assessment and sustainable management techniques
    Iqbal, Asad
    Liu, Xiaoming
    Chen, Guang-Hao
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 729
  • [8] THE RESEARCH OF MATERIALS LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT
    Nie, ZuoRen
    Gao, Feng
    Gong, XianZheng
    Wang, ZhiHong
    Zuo, TieYong
    INNOVATIVE PROCESSING AND MANUFACTURING OF ADVANCED CERAMICS AND COMPOSITES, 2010, 212 : 153 - 165
  • [9] Application typologies for life cycle assessment
    Bo Weidema
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 1998, 3 : 237 - 240
  • [10] Life cycle assessment of a large water treatment plant in Turkey
    Saad, Alaa
    Elginoz, Nilay
    Babuna, Fatos Germirli
    Iskender, Gulen
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2019, 26 (15) : 14823 - 14834