Development and validation of social issues advocacy scale 2-short form

被引：0
作者：
Nilsson, Johanna E. [1 ]
Marszalek, Jacob M. [1 ]
Kim, Alissa [1 ]
Khalid, Anum [1 ]
Bierman, Bethany [1 ]
Chabot, Sophie [1 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Missouri Kansas City, Dept Psychol & Counseling, Kansas City, MO 64110 USA
来源：
COUNSELLING PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY | 2024年
关键词：
Social justice; advocacy; training; scale development; counseling; COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGY; MULTICULTURAL COMPETENCE; JUSTICE ADVOCACY; STUDENTS; BELIEF; WORLD; EDUCATION; HEALTH; NEEDS;
D O I：
10.1080/09515070.2024.2441935
中图分类号：
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号：
040203 ;
摘要：
The Social Issues Advocacy Scale (SIAS) was published in 2011 as a tool to assess attitudes and behaviors associated with social justice advocacy. The scale was later revised to reflect updated theories and research, resulting in the 78-item scale, SIAS-2. Given the length of SIAS-2, this article reports on three studies with the aims to shorten the number of items and provide reliability and validity data. In Study 1, we developed SIAS-2 Short Form, consisting of 38 items and 8 subscales, measuring different aspects of social justice advocacy, replicating the scale structure of SAIS-2. In Study 2, we confirmed the scale structure, using confirmatory factor analysis, and examined construct validity. As expected, SIAS-2 SF was positively associated with political engagement, cultural openness, social justice self-efficacy, and engagement, and negatively associated with belief in a just world and cultural dominance. Total scale Cronbach's alpha was .94 (subscale alphas: .74-.87). As in Study 3, we examined test-retest reliability, with a score of r = .84 for the total scale score. The results revealed a 38-item scale with 8 subscales that appears valid and presents with good to excellent internal reliability. Limitations and implications are addressed.
引用
收藏
页数：22
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Akin A., Akkus Z., Gunes A., Bilgin O., The validity and reliability of Turkish version of the social issues advocacy scale, Journal of Educational & Instructional Studies in the World, 3, 2, pp. 198-201, (2013)
  • [2] Multicultural guidelines: An ecological approach to context, identity, and intersectionality, (2017)
  • [3] Beer A.M., Spanierman L.B., Greene J.C., Todd N.R., Counseling psychology trainees’ perceptions of training and commitments to social justice, Journal of Counseling Psychology, 59, 1, pp. 120-133, (2012)
  • [4] Berchtold A., Test-retest: Agreement or reliability?, Methodological Innovations, 9, (2016)
  • [5] Bergkamp J., Tugging at the root of oppression: Infusing social justice across doctoral level clinical psychology curriculum, Journal for Social Action in Counseling & Psychology, 14, 1, pp. 37-52, (2022)
  • [6] Bernstein A.G., Gendered characteristics of political engagement in college students, Sex Roles, 52, 5-6, pp. 299-310, (2005)
  • [7] Cohen D., Advocacy: Its many faces and a common understanding, Advocacy for social justice: A global action and reflection guide, pp. 7-10, (2001)
  • [8] Constantine M.G., Hage S.H., Kindaichi M.M., Bryant R.M., Social justice and multicultural issues: Implications for the practice and training of counselors and counseling psychologists, Journal of Counseling & Development, 85, 1, pp. 24-29, (2007)
  • [9] Davis M.C., Counselor educators’ social justice and advocacy belief and relationship to their action, (2019)
  • [10] DeBlaere C., Singh A.A., Wilcox M.M., Cokley K.O., Delgado-Romero E.A., Scalise D.A., Shawahin L., Social justice in counseling psychology: Then, now, and looking forward, Counseling Psychologist, 47, 6, pp. 938-962, (2019)
12345