The effectiveness of peer support interventions for community-dwelling adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials

被引:4
作者
Wilson, Monique V. [1 ,2 ]
Braithwaite, Felicity A. [1 ,2 ]
Arnold, John B. [3 ]
Crouch, Sophie M. [1 ,4 ]
Moore, Emily [1 ]
Heil, Alrun [5 ]
Cooper, Kay [6 ,7 ]
Stanton, Tasha R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Australia, Innovat, IMPlementat & Clin Translat IIMPACT Hlth, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
[2] South Australian Hlth & Med Res Inst SAHMRI, Hopwood Ctr Neurobiol, Persistent Pain Res Grp, Lifelong Hlth Theme, Adelaide, Australia
[3] Univ South Australia, Alliance Res Exercise Nutr & Act ARENA, Allied Hlth & Human Performance, Adelaide, Australia
[4] Univ Adelaide, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Adelaide, Australia
[5] Bern Univ Appl Sci BFH, Dept Hlth Sci, Bern, Switzerland
[6] Robert Gordon Univ, Sch Hlth Sci, Aberdeen, Scotland
[7] Robert Gordon Univ, Scottish Ctr Evidence based, Multiprofess Practice A JBI Ctr Excellence, Aberdeen, Scotland
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Chronic musculoskeletal pain; Self-management; Systematic review; Meta-analysis; Peer support; Peer mentorship; SELF-MANAGEMENT PROGRAM; LOW-BACK-PAIN; TAILORED PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; PRIMARY-CARE; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; RHEUMATIC-DISEASES; PATIENT EDUCATION; SOCIAL-ISOLATION; ARTHRITIS; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003293
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
This systematic review and meta-analysis critically examined the evidence for peer support interventions to reduce pain and improve health outcomes in community-dwelling adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain (PROSPERO CRD42022356850). A systematic search (inception-January 2023) of electronic databases and grey literature was undertaken to identify relevant randomised controlled trials, with risk of bias and GRADE assessments performed on included studies. Meta-analyses used a generic, inverse-variance, random-effects model, calculating mean difference (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD). Of 16,445 records identified, 29 records reporting on 24 studies (n = 6202 participants) were included. All evidence had unclear/high risk of bias and low-very low certainty. Peer support interventions resulted in small improvements in pain (medium-term: MD -3.48, 95% CI -6.61, -0.35; long-term: MD -1.97, 95% CI -3.53, -0.42), self-efficacy (medium-term: SMD 0.26, 95% CI 0.16, 0.36; long-term: SMD 0.21, 95% CI 0.07, 0.36), and function (long-term: SMD -0.10, 95% CI -0.19, -0.00) relative to usual care and greater self-efficacy (medium-term: SMD 0.36, 95% CI 0.20, 0.51) relative to waitlist control. Peer support interventions resulted in similar improvement as active (health professional led) interventions bar long-term self-efficacy (MD -0.41, 95% CI -0.77, -0.05), which favoured active interventions. No point estimates reached minimal clinically important difference thresholds. Pooled health service utilisation outcomes showed unclear estimates. Self-management, quality of life, and social support outcomes had mixed evidence. Despite low-very low evidence certainty, peer support interventions demonstrated small improvements over usual care and waitlist controls for some clinical outcomes, suggesting that peer support may be useful as an adjunct to other treatments for musculoskeletal pain.
引用
收藏
页码:2698 / 2720
页数:23
相关论文
共 96 条
[21]   What is the Minimum Clinically Important Difference for the WOMAC Index After TKA? [J].
Clement, Nicholas D. ;
Bardgett, Michelle ;
Weir, David ;
Holland, James ;
Gerrand, Craig ;
Deehan, David J. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2018, 476 (10) :2005-2014
[22]   EVALUATION OF ARTHRITIS SELF-MANAGEMENT COURSES LED BY LAYPERSONS AND BY PROFESSIONALS [J].
COHEN, JL ;
SAUTER, SV ;
DEVELLIS, RF ;
DEVELLIS, BM .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1986, 29 (03) :388-393
[23]  
Coleman S., 2011, Effectiveness of self-management programs for people with osteoarthritis of the knee
[24]  
Cooper K., 2014, JBI Database Syst Rev Implementation Rep, V12, P319
[25]   Exploring peer-mentoring for community dwelling older adults with chronic low back pain: a qualitative study [J].
Cooper, Kay ;
Schofield, Patricia ;
Klein, Susan ;
Smith, Blair H. ;
Jehu, Llinos M. .
PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2017, 103 (02) :138-145
[26]   Exploratory randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of a waiting list control design [J].
Cunningham, John A. ;
Kypri, Kypros ;
McCambridge, Jim .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2013, 13
[27]   Peer support within a health care context: a concept analysis [J].
Dennis, CL .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2003, 40 (03) :321-332
[28]   Self-management program for chronic low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Du, Shizheng ;
Hu, Lingli ;
Dong, Jianshu ;
Xu, Guihua ;
Chen, Xuan ;
Jin, Shengji ;
Zhang, Heng ;
Yin, Haiyan .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2017, 100 (01) :37-49
[29]   Measurement properties of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire in populations with musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review [J].
Dube, Marc-Olivier ;
Langevin, Pierre ;
Roy, Jean-Sebastien .
PAIN REPORTS, 2021, 6 (04) :E972
[30]   Expert-Moderated Peer-to-Peer Online Support Group for People With Knee Osteoarthritis: Mixed Methods Randomized Controlled Pilot and Feasibility Study [J].
Egerton, Thorlene ;
Lawford, Belinda J. ;
Campbell, Penny K. ;
Plinsinga, Melanie L. ;
Spiers, Libby ;
Mackenzie, David A. ;
Graham, Bridget ;
Mills, Kathryn ;
Eyles, Jillian ;
Knox, Gabrielle ;
Metcalf, Ben ;
Maclachlan, Liam R. ;
Besomi, Manuela ;
Dickson, Chris ;
Abraham, Charles ;
Vicenzino, Bill ;
Hodges, Paul W. ;
Hunter, David J. ;
Bennell, Kim L. .
JMIR FORMATIVE RESEARCH, 2022, 6 (01)