Simple analysis of biodiversity response functions and multipliers for biodiversity offsetting and other applications

被引:0
作者
Moilanen, Atte [1 ,2 ]
Lehtinen, Pauli [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Finnish Nat Hist Museum, POB 17, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Univ Helsinki, Dept Geosci & Geog, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Biodiversity credits; Biodiversity offsetting; Compensation ratio; Ecological compensation; Multiplier; Net positive impact; Offset ratio; Software application; NO NET LOSS; RESTORATION; MANAGEMENT; ECOLOGY; OUTCOMES; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsoft.2025.106322
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Biodiversity offsets mean compensation for ecological losses caused by construction, development, land use or other human activities. They are commonly implemented via protection, restoration, or maintenance of habitats. The goal of offsetting is usually no net loss (NNL), which means that all net losses to biodiversity are fully compensated by commensurate net gains achieved via said offset actions. Here we collate and develop simple calculations for the determination of offset size (area) in the context of so-called multiplier approaches to offsets. We focus on the analysis of the response of habitat condition to action, which is a critical component of multiplier calculations, because the effectiveness and speed of different conservation actions and interventions can vary significantly. An excel application and R-code are included that implement calculations on offset response functions. The proposed methods are also relevant for other applications, including the generation of biodiversity credits for biodiversity credit markets.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [11] Is there any empirical support for biodiversity offset policy?
    Curran, Michael
    Hellweg, Stefanie
    Beck, Jan
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2014, 24 (04) : 617 - 632
  • [12] Hopes for the future: Restoration ecology and conservation biology
    Dobson, AP
    Bradshaw, AD
    Baker, AJM
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1997, 277 (5325) : 515 - 522
  • [13] Does the NSW vegetation integrity assessment underestimate the conservation values of derived native grasslands?
    Dorrough, Josh
    Oliver, Ian
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MANAGEMENT & RESTORATION, 2024, 25 (02) : 129 - 138
  • [14] Global spatial coincidence between protected areas and metal mining activities
    Duran, America P.
    Rauch, Jason
    Gaston, Kevin J.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2013, 160 : 272 - 278
  • [15] Estimates of reserve effectiveness are confounded by leakage
    Ewers, Robert M.
    Rodrigues, Ana S. L.
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2008, 23 (03) : 113 - 116
  • [16] Gibbons Philip, 2007, Ecological Management & Restoration, V8, P26, DOI 10.1111/j.1442-8903.2007.00328.x
  • [17] Outcomes from 10 years of biodiversity offsetting
    Gibbons, Philip
    Macintosh, Andrew
    Constable, Amy Louise
    Hayashi, Kiichiro
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2018, 24 (02) : E643 - E654
  • [18] A Loss-Gain Calculator for Biodiversity Offsets and the Circumstances in Which No Net Loss Is Feasible
    Gibbons, Philip
    Evans, Megan C.
    Maron, Martine
    Gordon, Ascelin
    Le Roux, Darren
    von Hase, Amrei
    Lindenmayer, David B.
    Possingham, Hugh P.
    [J]. CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2016, 9 (04): : 252 - 259
  • [19] A method to quantify the effects of human disturbance on animal populations
    Gill, JA
    Sutherland, WJ
    Watkinson, AR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 1996, 33 (04) : 786 - 792
  • [20] Assessing the impacts of biodiversity offset policies
    Gordon, Ascelin
    Langford, William T.
    Todd, James A.
    White, Matt D.
    Mullerworth, Daniel W.
    Bekessy, Sarah A.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2011, 26 (12) : 1481 - 1488