Simple analysis of biodiversity response functions and multipliers for biodiversity offsetting and other applications

被引:0
作者
Moilanen, Atte [1 ,2 ]
Lehtinen, Pauli [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Finnish Nat Hist Museum, POB 17, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Univ Helsinki, Dept Geosci & Geog, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Biodiversity credits; Biodiversity offsetting; Compensation ratio; Ecological compensation; Multiplier; Net positive impact; Offset ratio; Software application; NO NET LOSS; RESTORATION; MANAGEMENT; ECOLOGY; OUTCOMES; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsoft.2025.106322
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Biodiversity offsets mean compensation for ecological losses caused by construction, development, land use or other human activities. They are commonly implemented via protection, restoration, or maintenance of habitats. The goal of offsetting is usually no net loss (NNL), which means that all net losses to biodiversity are fully compensated by commensurate net gains achieved via said offset actions. Here we collate and develop simple calculations for the determination of offset size (area) in the context of so-called multiplier approaches to offsets. We focus on the analysis of the response of habitat condition to action, which is a critical component of multiplier calculations, because the effectiveness and speed of different conservation actions and interventions can vary significantly. An excel application and R-code are included that implement calculations on offset response functions. The proposed methods are also relevant for other applications, including the generation of biodiversity credits for biodiversity credit markets.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2021, IUCN red list
  • [2] The costs of chronic noise exposure for terrestrial organisms
    Barber, Jesse R.
    Crooks, Kevin R.
    Fristrup, Kurt M.
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2010, 25 (03) : 180 - 189
  • [3] The biodiversity bank cannot be a lending bank
    Bekessy, Sarah A.
    Wintle, Brendan A.
    Lindenmayer, David B.
    Mccarthy, Michael A.
    Colyvan, Mark
    Burgman, Mark A.
    Possingham, Hugh P.
    [J]. CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2010, 3 (03): : 151 - 158
  • [4] The Swiss agri-environment scheme promotes farmland birds: but only moderately
    Birrer, Simon
    Spiess, Martin
    Herzog, Felix
    Jenny, Markus
    Kohli, Lukas
    Lugrin, Bernard
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORNITHOLOGY, 2007, 148 (Suppl 2): : S295 - S303
  • [5] Accounting for Uncertainty and Time Lags in Equivalency Calculations for Offsetting in Aquatic Resources Management Programs
    Bradford, Michael J.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2017, 60 (04) : 588 - 597
  • [6] Contested terrain: Mining and the environment
    Bridge, G
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, 2004, 29 : 205 - 259
  • [7] Land management impacts on European butterflies of conservation concern: a review
    Bubova, Terezie
    Vrabec, Vladimir
    Kulma, Martin
    Nowicki, Piotr
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INSECT CONSERVATION, 2015, 19 (05) : 805 - 821
  • [8] Importance of Baseline Specification in Evaluating Conservation Interventions and Achieving No Net Loss of Biodiversity
    Bull, J. W.
    Gordon, A.
    Law, E. A.
    Suttle, K. B.
    Milner-Gulland, E. J.
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2014, 28 (03) : 799 - 809
  • [9] Implementation Gap between the Theory and Practice of Biodiversity Offset Multipliers
    Bull, Joseph W.
    Lloyd, Samuel P.
    Strange, Niels
    [J]. CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2017, 10 (06): : 656 - 669
  • [10] Biodiversity trajectories and the time needed to achieve no net loss through averted-loss biodiversity offsets
    Buschke, Falko T.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2017, 352 : 54 - 57