A model based on Chinese thyroid imaging reporting and data systems for predicting Bethesda III/IV thyroid nodules

被引:0
作者
Wei, An [1 ,2 ]
Tang, Yu-Long [3 ]
Tang, Shi-Chu [4 ]
Cui, Xin-Wu [5 ]
Zhang, Chao-Xue [2 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Normal Univ, Hunan Prov Peoples Hosp, Dept Ultrasound, Affiliated Hosp 1, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Anhui Med Univ, Dept Ultrasound, Affiliated Hosp 1, Hefei, Anhui, Peoples R China
[3] Cent South Univ, Hunan Canc Hosp, Xiangya Sch Med, Dept Thyroid Surg,Affiliated Canc Hosp, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
[4] Cent South Univ, Affiliated Canc Hosp, Hunan Canc Hosp, Dept Med Ultrasound,Xiangya Sch Med, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
[5] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Hosp, Tongji Med Coll, Dept Med Ultrasound, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY | 2025年 / 16卷
关键词
ultrasound; thyroid nodule; the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytology; Chinese thyroid imaging reporting and data systems; fine needle aspiration; TI-RADS; CANCER;
D O I
10.3389/fendo.2025.1442575
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives This study aimed to explore the performance of a model based on Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (C-TIRADS), clinical characteristics, and other ultrasound characteristics for the prediction of Bethesda III/IV thyroid nodules before fine needle aspiration (FNA). Materials and methods A total of 855 thyroid nodules from 810 patients were included. All nodules underwent ultrasound examination before FNA. All nodules were categorized according to the C-TIRADS criteria and classified into two groups, Bethesda III/IV and non-III/IV thyroid nodules, using cytologic diagnosis as the gold standard. The clinical and ultrasonographic characteristics of the nodules in the two groups were compared, and independent predictors of Bethesda III/IV nodules were determined by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, based on which a prediction model was constructed. The predictive efficacy of the model was compared with that of C-TIRADS alone by sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC). Results Our study found that the C-TIRADS category, homogeneous echotexture, blood flow signal present, and posterior echo unchanged were independent predictors for Bethesda III/IV thyroid nodules. Based on multiple logistic regression, a predictive model was established: Logit (p)= - 4.213 + 0.965 x homogeneous echotexture+ 1.050 x blood flow signal present + 0.473 x posterior echo unchanged+ 2.859 x C-TIRADS 3 + 2.804 x C-TIRADS 4A + 1.824 x C-TIRADS 4B + 0.919 x C-TIRADS 4C. The AUC of the model among all nodules was 0.746 (95%CI: 0.710-0.782), 0.779 (95%CI: 0.730-0.829) among nodules with a diameter (D) > 10mm, and 0.718 (95%CI: 0.667-0.769) among nodules with D <= 10mm, which were significantly higher than that of the C-TIRADS alone. Conclusion We developed a predictive model for Bethesda III/IV thyroid nodules that is better for nodules with D > 10mm FNA operators can choose the optimal puncture strategy based on the prediction results to improve the rate of definitive diagnosis of the first FNA of Bethesda III/IV nodules and thus reduce repeat FNA.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [21] Explore the Diagnostic Efficiency of Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems by Comparing With the Other Four Systems (ACR TI-RADS, Kwak-TIRADS, KSThR-TIRADS, and EU-TIRADS): A Single-Center Study
    Qi, Qi
    Zhou, Aiyun
    Guo, Suping
    Huang, Xingzhi
    Chen, Songli
    Li, Yaohui
    Xu, Pan
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [22] Molecular testing in thyroid cancer diagnosis and management
    Sipos, Jennifer A.
    Ringel, Matthew D.
    [J]. BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2023, 37 (01)
  • [23] BI-RADS® fifth edition: A summary of changes
    Spak, D. A.
    Plaxco, J. S.
    Santiago, L.
    Dryden, M. J.
    Dogan, B. E.
    [J]. DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2017, 98 (03) : 179 - 190
  • [24] Reproducibility and Interobserver Agreement of Different Thyroid Imaging and Reporting Data Systems (TIRADS)
    Sych, Yulia P.
    Fadeev, Valentin V.
    Fisenko, Elena P.
    Kalashnikova, Marina
    [J]. EUROPEAN THYROID JOURNAL, 2021, 10 (02) : 161 - 167
  • [25] Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS): A User's Guide
    Tessler, Franklin N.
    Middleton, William D.
    Grant, Edward G.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2018, 287 (01) : 29 - 36
  • [26] ACR Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS): White Paper of the ACR TI-RADS Committee
    Tessler, Franklin N.
    Middleton, William D.
    Grant, Edward G.
    Hoang, Jenny K.
    Berland, Lincoln L.
    Teefey, Sharlene A.
    Cronan, John J.
    Beland, Michael D.
    Desser, Terry S.
    Frates, Mary C.
    Hammers, Lynwood W.
    Hamper, Ulrike M.
    Langer, Jill E.
    Reading, Carl C.
    Scoutt, Leslie M.
    Stavros, A. Thomas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 14 (05) : 587 - 595
  • [27] Yao JC, 2024, Arxiv, DOI [arXiv:2402.02401, DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.2402.02401]
  • [28] AI diagnosis of Bethesda category IV thyroid nodules
    Yao, Jincao
    Zhang, Yanming
    Shen, Jiafei
    Lei, Zhikai
    Xiong, Jing
    Feng, Bojian
    Li, Xiaoxian
    Li, Wei
    Ou, Di
    Lu, Yidan
    Feng, Na
    Yan, Meiying
    Chen, Jinjie
    Chen, Liyu
    Yang, Chen
    Wang, Lipin
    Wang, Kai
    Zhou, Jianhua
    Liang, Ping
    Xu, Dong
    [J]. ISCIENCE, 2023, 26 (11)
  • [29] 2020 Chinese guidelines for ultrasound malignancy risk stratification of thyroid nodules: the C-TIRADS
    Zhou, JianQiao
    Yin, LiXue
    Wei, Xi
    Zhang, Sheng
    Song, YanYan
    Luo, BaoMing
    Li, JianChu
    Qian, LinXue
    Cui, LiGang
    Chen, Wen
    Wen, ChaoYang
    Peng, YuLan
    Chen, Qin
    Lu, Man
    Chen, Min
    Wu, Rong
    Zhou, Wei
    Xue, EnSheng
    Li, YingJia
    Yang, LiChun
    Mi, ChengRong
    Zhang, RuiFang
    Wu, Gang
    Du, GuoQing
    Huang, DaoZhong
    Zhan, WeiWei
    [J]. ENDOCRINE, 2020, 70 (02) : 256 - 279
  • [30] Diagnostic performance of US-based FNAB criteria of the 2020 Chinese guideline for malignant thyroid nodules: comparison with the 2017 American College of Radiology guideline, the 2015 American Thyroid Association guideline, and the 2016 Korean Thyroid Association guideline
    Zhu, Hui
    Yang, Yan
    Wu, Senmin
    Chen, Kai
    Luo, Hongxia
    Huang, Jianle
    [J]. QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2021, 11 (08) : 3604 - 3618