Disitamab vedotin vs. gemcitabine-cisplatin regimen with immunotherapy: a comparative analysis of efficacy and safety in muscle-invasive bladder cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, Chuanao [1 ]
Yu, Yanhang [1 ]
Zhou, Qi [2 ]
Ouyang, Jun [1 ]
Zhang, Zhiyu [1 ]
机构
[1] Soochow Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Urol, Suzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Soochow Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Reprod Med Ctr, Suzhou, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY | 2025年 / 16卷
关键词
muscle-invasive bladder cancer; disitamab vedotin; gemcitabine; cisplatin; immunotherapy; pathological complete response rate; NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; PHASE-II; MULTICENTER; CYSTECTOMY; ANTIBODY; THERAPY; VERSION; CYCLES;
D O I
10.3389/fimmu.2025.1549647
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Introduction Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is an aggressive bladder cancer characterized by invasion of the muscular bladder wall, often necessitating a multimodal treatment approach for optimal outcomes. This study aimed to compare the real-world efficacy and safety of disitamab vedotin (RC48), an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), combined immunotherapy targeting programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1), against the gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) regimen with PD-1 immunotherapy in the treatment of MIBC.Methods This single-center, retrospective study was conducted at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University and included 38 patients with MIBC treated with either RC48 plus immunotherapy or GC regimen plus immunotherapy, between January 2022 and December 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: the RC48 with immunotherapy (ADC + PD-1) group and the GC regimen with immunotherapy (GC + PD-1) group. Efficacy was evaluated based on their pathological complete response rates (PCRR) and pathological downstaging rates (PDR). Adverse events (AEs) were assessed to compare safety profiles.Results Of the 38 patients, 17 were in the ADC + PD-1 group and 21 were in the GC + PD-1 group. The PCRR was significantly higher in the ADC + PD-1 group (82.35%, 14/17) compared to the GC + PD-1 group (47.62%, 10/21; P = 0.043). The PDR was also higher in the ADC + PD-1 group (94.12%, 16/17) than in the GC + PD-1 group (80.95%, 17/21), although the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.355). No serious allergic reactions or fatal AEs were reported in either group. No Grade 4 AEs were reported, while Grade 3 AEs occurred at a rate of 5.71% in the ADC + PD-1 group and 12.20% in the GC + PD-1 group (P = 0.260).Conclusion RC48 combined with immunotherapy demonstrated a significantly higher PCRR compared to the GC regimen with immunotherapy, while maintaining a comparable safety profile. These findings highlight the potential of RC48 combined with immunotherapy as an effective treatment option for MIBC in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Retrospective analysis of the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant gemcitabine and cisplatin in muscle-invasive bladder cancer
    Meleis, Laura
    Moore, Russell
    Inman, Brant A.
    Harrison, Michael R.
    JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2020, 26 (02) : 330 - 337
  • [2] SAFETY AND EFFICACY GEMCITABINE-CISPLATIN SPLIT DOSE AS A NEOADUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY FOR MUSCLE INVASIVE BLADDER CANCER
    Abdelhafez, Mohamed
    Williams, Michael
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : E1194 - E1194
  • [3] THE OUTCOME COMPARISON OF NEOADJUVNAT AND ADJUVANT GEMCITABINE-CISPLATIN CHEMOTHERAPY FOR MUSCLE-INVASIVE BLADDER CANCER
    Matsubara, N.
    Mukai, H.
    Naito, Y.
    Yamaguchi, T.
    Sasaki, M.
    Nezu, M.
    Itoh, K.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2012, 23 : 142 - 143
  • [4] Comparative analysis of three vs. four cycles of neoadjuvant gemcitabine and cisplatin for muscle invasive bladder cancer
    Aydin, Ahmet Murat
    Cheriyan, Salim K.
    Reich, Richard
    Hajiran, Ali
    Peyton, Charles C.
    Zemp, Logan
    Yu, Alice
    Li, Roger
    Poch, Michael A.
    Spiess, Philippe E.
    Jain, Rohit
    Zhang, Jingsong
    Sexton, Wade J.
    Gilbert, Scott M.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2022, 40 (10) : 453.e19 - 453.e26
  • [5] Tislelizumab with gemcitabine and cisplatin as a neoadjuvant regimen for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: case series
    Wang, Ze
    Wang, Yapeng
    Wang, Shuo
    Ran, Qiang
    Peng, Song
    Zhang, Yao
    Zhang, Jun
    Zhang, Dianzheng
    Wang, Luofu
    Lan, Weihua
    Liu, Qiuli
    Jiang, Jun
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2024, 86 (01): : 245 - 251
  • [6] Neoadjuvant therapy with Disitamab vedotin in treating muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A case report
    Huang, Haijun
    Zhang, Yucong
    Chen, Zhi
    Zeng, Xing
    Hu, Zhiquan
    Yang, Chunguang
    HELIYON, 2023, 9 (04)
  • [7] Efficacy and safety of disitamab vedotin combined with gemcitabine as neoadjuvant therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A multi-center, single-arm, phase II trial
    Yang, C.
    Huang, H.
    Zeng, X.
    Dai, H.
    Zhou, G.
    Wang, S.
    Hu, Z.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2024, 35 : S1148 - S1148
  • [8] Implications for Efficacy and Safety of Total Dose and Dose-Intensity of Neoadjuvant Gemcitabine-Cisplatin in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Three-Week Versus Four-Week Regimen
    Holmsten, Karin
    Omland, Lise Hoj
    Als, Anne Birgitte
    Agerbaek, Mads
    Dohn, Line Hammer
    Lindberg, Henriette
    Jensen, Niels Viggo
    Carus, Andreas
    Moe, Mette
    Hosseini, Abolfazl
    Radkiewicz, Cecilia
    Pappot, Helle
    Ullen, Anders
    BLADDER CANCER, 2022, 8 (01) : 71 - 80
  • [9] Efficacy and biomarker analysis of neoadjuvant disitamab vedotin combined immunotherapy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A multi-center real-world study
    Yan, L.
    Hu, J.
    Liu, J.
    Chen, J.
    Zu, X.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2024, 35 : S1157 - S1157
  • [10] Neoadjuvant Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin for Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer
    Kaneko, Gou
    Kikuchi, Eiji
    Matsumoto, Kazuhiro
    Obata, Jun
    Nakamura, So
    Miyajima, Akira
    Oya, Mototsugu
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 41 (07) : 908 - 914