Policy effects of water rights trading (WRT)

被引:1
作者
Liu, Jia [1 ]
Shi, Ke [1 ]
Wang, Zhaohua [1 ]
Jin, Chenyu [1 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Stat & Math, Shandong 250014, Peoples R China
关键词
WRT; Water use efficiency; Double difference model; Divergence characteristics; IRRIGATION; SCARCITY; MARKETS; SUSTAINABILITY; INSTITUTIONS; PERFORMANCE; ALLOCATION; EFFICIENCY; RESOURCES; STRATEGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.indic.2024.100537
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
China's emphasis on rapid economic growth in the past years has led to irrational exploitation and utilization of water resources. Water rights trading (WRT), as an important initiative carried out by the Chinese government, has been implemented for eight years but mainly in some pilot provinces. In this paper, a multi-point difference- in-difference model is constructed to study the causality of WRT policies in China from 2012 to 2021 and verifies the scientific validity of the research results through parallelism test, time and individual placebo test, endogeneity test of Logit reverse causality, and robustness test. The impact of the WRT system on the utlization efficiency of water resources, as well as its mechanism and heterogeneity characteristics, is mainly explored. The research results demonstrate that WRT helps to improve the utilization efficiency of water resources in polot provinces, which is even more pronounced in the presence of government expenditures. In addition, the effect of WRT implementation is signigicantly related to regional industrial technological empowerment and residents' awareness of environmental protection and insignificantly related to regional agricultural sophistication. The findings of this study will provide empirical support for the Chinese government's local strategy of establishing a unified national WRT market.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]   Agricultural Water Use and Trade in Uzbekistan: Situation and Potential Impacts of Market Liberalization [J].
Abdullaev, Iskandar ;
De Fraiture, Charlotte ;
Giordano, Mark ;
Yakubov, Murat ;
Rasulov, Aziz .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, 2009, 25 (01) :47-63
[2]  
Absori A, 2022, Pena Justisia Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum, V20, DOI [10.31941/pj.v20i1.1715, 10.31941/pj.v20i1.1715, DOI 10.31941/PJ.V20I1.1715]
[3]  
Andriansyah A., 2021, Research Horizon, P86, DOI DOI 10.54518/RH.1.3.2021.86-93
[4]   Urban water scarcity in China: A systematic review of research advances and future directions [J].
Ba, Wenxin ;
Wang, Dejiang ;
Gong, Binghua ;
Dai, Yihua ;
Yang, Zhipeng ;
Liu, Zhifeng .
APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2023, 159
[5]   A WATER RIGHTS TRADING APPROACH TO INCREASING INFLOWS TO THE ARAL SEA [J].
Bekchanov, Maksud ;
Ringler, Claudia ;
Bhaduri, Anik .
LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 29 (04) :952-961
[6]  
Bisogno M.P. R., 2017, Financial Sustainability in Public Administration p, P57, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-57962-7, 10.1007/978-3-319-57962-7_3, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-57962-7_3, 10.1007/978-3-319-57962-73]
[7]   The Politics of Disciplining Water Rights [J].
Boelens, Rutgerd .
DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE, 2009, 40 (02) :307-331
[8]   Understanding the emergence of water market institutions: learning from functioning water markets in three countries [J].
Breviglieri, Gustavo Velloso ;
do Sol Osorio, Guarany Ipe ;
Puppim de Oliveira, Jose A. .
WATER POLICY, 2018, 20 (06) :1075-1091
[9]  
Brisman A., 2020, Water, Governance, and Crime Issues, P17, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-44798-42, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-44798-42]
[10]   Resource intensity, institutions, and development [J].
Bulte, EH ;
Damania, R ;
Deacon, RT .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2005, 33 (07) :1029-1044