Chunk reading strategy training improves multiword processing by Japanese English learners

被引:0
作者
Kosaka, Takumi [1 ]
Zhao, Helen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Sch Languages & Linguist, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
关键词
Chunk-and-Pass model; chunk reading strategy training; construction grammar; multiword processing; second language; ACQUISITION; PSYTOOLKIT; LANGUAGE; POWER;
D O I
10.1075/aral.24019.kos
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
The Chunk-and-Pass model suggests that language acquisition involves learning to appropriately chunk language input into multiword sequences and to form more abstract linguistic representations. While the theoretical model has gained widespread attention in the language sciences, there are limited studies that adopt this model, particularly in the context of second language (L2) learning and teaching research. This study examines the effects of Chunk Reading Strategy Training (CRST), which was developed based on the model, on multiword processing in low-proficiency Japanese learners of English. A treatment group received CRST, while a control group underwent standard block-format reading training. A phrasal decision test assessed online multiword processing at pretest, posttest, and delayed posttest stages. The results indicated improvement in response times post-intervention for the treatment group, and only in the delayed posttest for the control group. This study, therefore, discusses the theoretical implications and limitations of CRST.
引用
收藏
页数:34
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] Abney S.P., Parsing by chunks, Princople-based parsing, pp. 257-278, (1991)
  • [2] Altmann G.T., Kamide Y., The real-time mediation of visual attention by language and world knowledge: Linking anticipatory (and other) eye movements to linguistic processing, Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 4, pp. 502-518, (2007)
  • [3] Arnon I., Snider N., More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases, Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 1, pp. 67-82, (2010)
  • [4] Bates C.T., Maechler M., Bolker B., Walker S.C., Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4, Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1, pp. 1-48, (2015)
  • [5] Bates D., Kliegl R., Vasishth S., Baayen H., Parsimonious mixed models, (2015)
  • [6] Brehm L., Alday P.M., Contrast coding choices in a decade of mixed models, Journal of Memory and Language, 125, (2022)
  • [7] Brown M., Savova V., Gibson E., Syntax encodes information structure: Evidence from on-line reading comprehension, Journal of memory and language, 66, 1, pp. 194-209, (2012)
  • [8] Brysbaert M., Debeer D., How to run linear mixed effects analysis for pairwise comparisons? A tutorial and a proposal for the calculation of standardized effect sizes, (2023)
  • [9] Christiansen M.H., Chater N., The now-or-never bottleneck: A fundamental constraint on language, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39, (2016)
  • [10] Clahsen H., Felser C., Some notes on the shallow structure hypothesis, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40, 3, pp. 693-706, (2018)