The Globalization and Ecological Footprint in European Countries: Correlation or Causation?

被引:9
作者
Karimli, Turan [1 ,2 ]
Mirzaliyev, Nihal [1 ,2 ]
Guliyev, Hasraddin [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Azerbaijan State Univ Econ, Baku, Azerbaijan
[2] Istanbul Univ, Dept Econ, Istanbul, Turkiye
[3] Western Caspian Univ, Baku, Azerbaijan
来源
RESEARCH IN GLOBALIZATION | 2024年 / 8卷
关键词
Globalization; Ecological footprints; Panel granger non-causality test; ENVIRONMENTAL KUZNETS CURVE; UNIT-ROOT TESTS; PANEL-DATA; EMISSIONS; DYNAMICS; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.resglo.2024.100208
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Exploring the influencing factors of the ecological footprint is a current focus. However, the impacts of globalization on the ecological footprint are inconclusive due to the complexity among variables. The objective of this paper is to investigate the effects of globalization on the ecological footprint in 35 European countries in 1970-2020. While conducting the research, causality, which goes beyond correlation, was emphasized, and the new panel noncausality test is employed. The results indicate that globalization is generally Granger-cause of the ecological footprint in European countries. Additionally, the individual causation test results also show a unidirectional causality from economic globalization to the ecological footprint, bidirectional causality between social globalization and the ecological footprint, and no causality exists between political globalization and the ecological footprint. In conclusion, this paper not only provides valuable insights into the complex dynamics between globalization and ecological footprints but also offers nuanced policy recommendations tailored to European countries. These recommendations are designed to guide them toward achieving long-term sustainability in the face of the intricate relationships between globalization and ecological footprints.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 86 条
  • [1] Modelling coal rent, economic growth and CO2 emissions: Does regulatory quality matter in BRICS economies?
    Adedoyin, Festus Fatai
    Gumede, Moses Iga
    Bekun, Festus Victor
    Etokakpan, Mfonobong Udom
    Balsalobre-lorente, Daniel
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 710 (710)
  • [2] Does globalization increase the ecological footprint? Empirical evidence from Malaysia
    Ahmed, Zahoor
    Wang, Zhaohua
    Mahmood, Faisal
    Hafeez, Muhammad
    Ali, Nazakat
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2019, 26 (18) : 18565 - 18582
  • [3] Eigenvalue Ratio Test for the Number of Factors
    Ahn, Seung C.
    Horenstein, Alex R.
    [J]. ECONOMETRICA, 2013, 81 (03) : 1203 - 1227
  • [4] Aliyev V., 2023, GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites, V47, P515
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2019, International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, DOI DOI 10.32479/IJEEP.7458
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2023, Transportation emissions worldwide
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2022, KOF Globalisation Index
  • [8] Is free trade good for the environment?
    Antweiler, W
    Copeland, BR
    Taylor, MS
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 91 (04) : 877 - 908
  • [9] Asici A. A., 2016, Does income growth relocate ecological footprint?, V61, P707
  • [10] A panic attack on unit roots and cointegration
    Bai, JS
    Ng, S
    [J]. ECONOMETRICA, 2004, 72 (04) : 1127 - 1177