Describing the Core Attributes and Impact of Comprehensive Cancer Centers Internationally: A Chronological Scoping Review

被引:0
作者
Thamm, Carla [1 ,2 ]
Button, Elise [1 ,2 ]
Johal, Jolyn [1 ]
Knowles, Reegan [1 ]
Paterson, Catherine [1 ,3 ]
Halpern, Michael T. [1 ,4 ]
Charalambous, Andreas [5 ,6 ]
Chan, Alexandre [7 ]
Aranda, Sanchia [8 ]
Taylor, Carolyn [9 ]
Chan, Raymond J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Flinders Univ S Australia, Caring Futures Inst, Coll Nursing & Hlth Sci, Adelaide, SA 5042, Australia
[2] Queensland Univ Technol, Canc & Palliat Care Outcomes Ctr, Sch Nursing, Brisbane, Qld 4059, Australia
[3] Cent Adelaide Local Hlth Network, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
[4] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr San Antonio, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Hlth Serv Adm, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
[5] Cyprus Univ Technol, Fac Hlth Sci, CY-3036 Limassol, Cyprus
[6] Univ Turku, Fac Hlth Sci, Turku 20014, Finland
[7] Univ Calif Irvine, Coll Hlth Sci, Sch Pharm & Pharmaceut Sci, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[8] Univ Melbourne, Med Dent & Hlth Sci, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
[9] Global Focus Canc, South Salem, NY 10590 USA
关键词
attributes; chronological; comprehensive cancer center; impact; international; scoping review; COMMUNITY OUTREACH; CARE; ACCREDITATION; ORGANIZATION; ONCOLOGY; QUALITY; RECOMMENDATIONS; REQUIREMENTS; ENGAGEMENT; BIOBANKING;
D O I
10.3390/cancers17061023
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background/Objectives: Comprehensive cancer centers (CCCs) remain at the forefront of cancer control efforts. Limited clarity and variation exist around the models, scope, characteristics, and impacts of CCCs around the globe. This scoping review systematically searched and synthesized the international literature, describing core attributes and anticipated and realized impacts of CCCs, detailing changes over time. Methods: Searches for English language sources were conducted across PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, Epistemonikos, and the gray literature from January 2002 to April 2024. Data were extracted and appraised by two authors. Results were narratively synthesized. Results: Of 3895 database records and 843 gray literature sources screened, 81 sources were included. Papers were predominantly opinion-based, from the USA and Europe, and published between 2011 and 2020. Internationally, the interconnected attributes of CCCs included (1) clinical service provision; (2) research, data, and innovation; (3) education and clinical support; (4) networks and leadership; (5) health equity and inclusiveness; and (6) accountability and governance. Largely anticipated impacts were synergistic and included delivery of optimal, person-centered, complex care; development of a highly qualified cancer workforce; greater research activity and funding; effective, strategic alliances; and reduction in cancer-related inequalities. Limited evidence was found demonstrating measurable broad outcomes of CCCs. The early literature highlighted the establishment, development, and accreditation of CCCs. The ongoing literature has reflected the evolution of cancer care, key areas for growth, and limitations of CCCs. Recently, the CCC literature has increased exponentially and focused on the need for CCCs to drive networks and leadership to address health equity and inclusiveness. Conclusions: Results suggest that CCCs are yet to reach their full potential, with future efforts ideally focusing on accountability, effective networking, and health equity at a local, national, and international level. CCCs must generate evidence of impact, and continue to evolve in line with contemporary healthcare, to fulfil their role in cancer control efforts.
引用
收藏
页数:37
相关论文
共 104 条
  • [91] Sukhera Javeed, 2022, J Grad Med Educ, V14, P414, DOI 10.4300/JGME-D-22-00480.1
  • [92] Has the US Cancer Centre model been 'successful'? Lessons for the European cancer community
    Sullivan, Richard
    [J]. MOLECULAR ONCOLOGY, 2009, 3 (03) : 192 - 203
  • [93] Minority Use of a National Cancer Institute-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Center and Non-specialty Hospitals in Two Florida Regions
    Sultan, Dawood H.
    Gishe, Jemal
    Hanciles, Angella
    Comins, Meg M.
    Norris, Claire M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RACIAL AND ETHNIC HEALTH DISPARITIES, 2015, 2 (03) : 373 - 384
  • [94] A systematic review and meta-analysis of patient-relevant outcomes in comprehensive cancer centers versus noncomprehensive cancer centers
    Thamm, Carla
    Button, Elise
    Johal, Jolyn
    Knowles, Reegan
    Gulyani, Aarti
    Paterson, Catherine
    Halpern, Michael T.
    Charalambous, Andreas
    Chan, Alexandre
    Aranda, Sanchia
    Taylor, Carolyn
    Chan, Raymond J.
    [J]. CANCER, 2025, 131 (01)
  • [95] A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data
    Thomas, David R.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EVALUATION, 2006, 27 (02) : 237 - 246
  • [96] A framework for building comprehensive cancer center's capacity for bidirectional engagement
    Trapl, Erika S.
    Gonzalez, Sarah Koopman
    Austin, Kristina
    [J]. CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2024, 35 (06) : 963 - 971
  • [97] Tricco AC, 2018, ANN INTERN MED, V169, P467, DOI 10.7326/M18-0850
  • [98] National Estimates of the Participation of Patients With Cancer in Clinical Research Studies Based on Commission on Cancer Accreditation Data
    Unger, Joseph M.
    Shulman, Lawrence N.
    Facktor, Matthew A.
    Nelson, Heidi
    Fleury, Mark E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 42 (18) : 2139 - 2148
  • [99] University of Cambridge Cambridge, First UK Centre to Be Given 'Comprehensive Cancer Centre of Excellence'
  • [100] The Role of Comprehensive Cancer Centers in Survivorship Care Afterword
    Van Harten, Wim H.
    Paradiso, Angelo
    Le Beau, Michelle M.
    [J]. CANCER, 2013, 119 : 2200 - 2201