Assessing the Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in the Routine Clinical Care of Chronic Rhinosinusitis Patients: A Canadian Perspective

被引:0
|
作者
Kim, Hugh Andrew Jinwook [1 ]
Lee, Daniel J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Shin, Dongho [1 ]
Horton, Garret [1 ]
Gignac, Monique [4 ]
Lee, John M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chan, Yvonne [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, 30 Bond St,Room 8-163 CC North, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Div Rhinol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] St Michaels Hosp, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
来源
JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY | 2024年 / 53卷
关键词
chronic rhinosinusitis; patient-reported outcome measures; survey; endoscopic sinus surgery; biologics; ENDOSCOPIC SINUS SURGERY; ADULT CHRONIC RHINOSINUSITIS; GEOGRAPHIC-VARIATION; NASAL POLYPOSIS; OMALIZUMAB; EFFICACY; ALBERTA; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1177/19160216241288806
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Importance Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a common inflammatory disease of the paranasal sinuses with significant quality of life impairments. There is a need to implement outcome-based metrics to evaluate the outcomes of CRS treatment with endoscopic sinus surgery or biologics.Objective We aimed to understand Canadian otolaryngologists' opinions on patient-related outcome measures (PROM) for CRS and identify potential barriers to implementation.Design Qualitative research.Setting and Participants A cross-sectional survey was distributed via the Canadian Society of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and direct emailing.Measures Participants' demographics, practice information, and opinions on PROM were collected.Results Of 346 (23%) Canadian otolaryngologists, 78 responded to the survey (26 rhinology fellowship-trained, 51 non-fellowship-trained, and 1 missing data). Thirty-eight responded that they collect PROM (69% with fellowship-trained, 39% non-fellowship-trained, P = .029). Regarding opinions on PROM, 74% of respondents agreed that it helps patients report their symptoms, 42% agreed that it improves the efficiency of the patient encounter, 54% agreed that it is easy for patients to understand, 62% agreed that it improves management and monitoring of clinical outcomes, and 71% disagreed that PROM is not helpful. Fellowship-trained otolaryngologists were 4 times more likely to agree that PROM improves management and monitoring of clinical outcomes (P = .014), and no other differences in opinions were significant. The most-frequently-identified barriers to PROM usage were lack of time for 67% of respondents, difficulty integrating into clinical workflow for 64%, and lack of integration into the electronic medical record for 47%. If these barriers were addressed, 86% of respondents said they would use PROM in their practice.Conclusions and Relevance Despite the low uptake of PROM among otolaryngologists without rhinology fellowship, opinions were generally favorable. We identified barriers that, if addressed, may increase their use in clinical practice. As resource-limited therapies such as biologics become more prevalent in CRS management, PROM may find more applications in shared clinical decision making. Graphical abstract
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Rhinitis and Chronic Rhinosinusitis
    Dykewicz, Mark S.
    Wallace, Dana V.
    Bandi, Sindhura
    Mahdavinia, Mahboobeh
    Sedaghat, Ahmad R.
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE, 2024, 12 (10) : 2574 - 2582
  • [2] Barriers and Benefits to the Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Routine Clinical Care: A Qualitative Study
    Philpot, Lindsey M.
    Barnes, Sunni A.
    Brown, Rachel M.
    Austin, Jessica A.
    James, Cameron S.
    Stanford, Richard H.
    Ebbert, Jon O.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY, 2018, 33 (04) : 359 - 364
  • [3] Patient Satisfaction with Collection of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Routine Care
    Recinos, Pablo F.
    Dunphy, Cheryl J.
    Thompson, Nicolas
    Schuschu, Jesse
    Urchek, John L., III
    Katzan, Irene L.
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2017, 34 (02) : 452 - 465
  • [4] Patient Satisfaction with Collection of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Routine Care
    Pablo F. Recinos
    Cheryl J. Dunphy
    Nicolas Thompson
    Jesse Schuschu
    John L. Urchek
    Irene L. Katzan
    Advances in Therapy, 2017, 34 : 452 - 465
  • [5] Core patient-reported outcome domains for routine clinical care in chronic pain management: patients’ and healthcare professionals’ perspective
    Diana Zidarov
    Alexia Zidarova-Carrié
    Regina Visca
    J. Marc Miller
    Krista Brecht
    Natacha Viens
    Sara Ahmed
    Quality of Life Research, 2020, 29 : 2007 - 2020
  • [6] Core patient-reported outcome domains for routine clinical care in chronic pain management: patients' and healthcare professionals' perspective
    Zidarov, Diana
    Zidarova-Carrie, Alexia
    Visca, Regina
    Miller, J. Marc
    Brecht, Krista
    Viens, Natacha
    Ahmed, Sara
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2020, 29 (07) : 2007 - 2020
  • [7] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Routine Hematology Cancer Care
    Kirkpatrick, Suriya
    Campbell, Karen
    Harding, Samantha
    Rudd, Sarah
    CANCER NURSING, 2024,
  • [8] A perspective on the use of patient-reported experience and patient-reported outcome measures in ambulatory healthcare
    Hays, Ron D.
    Quigley, Denise D.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2025, : 441 - 449
  • [9] Training clinicians in how to use patient-reported outcome measures in routine clinical practice
    Maria J. Santana
    Lotte Haverman
    Kate Absolom
    Elena Takeuchi
    David Feeny
    Martha Grootenhuis
    Galina Velikova
    Quality of Life Research, 2015, 24 : 1707 - 1718
  • [10] Training clinicians in how to use patient-reported outcome measures in routine clinical practice
    Santana, Maria J.
    Haverman, Lotte
    Absolom, Kate
    Takeuchi, Elena
    Feeny, David
    Grootenhuis, Martha
    Velikova, Galina
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2015, 24 (07) : 1707 - 1718