Robotic-Assistance in Total Hip Arthroplasty Is Associated With Decreased Dislocation Rates

被引:1
作者
Swartz, Gabrielle N. [1 ]
Bains, Sandeep S. [1 ]
Dubin, Jeremy A. [1 ]
Katanbaf, Reza [1 ]
Hayes, Hunter [2 ]
Nace, James [1 ]
Mont, Michael A. [1 ]
Delanois, Ronald E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Sinai Hosp Baltimore, Rubin Inst Adv Orthoped, LifeBridge Hlth, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Philadelphia Coll Osteopath Med, Orthopaed Surg, Philadelphia, PA USA
关键词
Total hip arthroplasty; Osteoarthritis; Robotic-assistance; Dislocation; Technology; OUTCOMES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.artd.2024.101473
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: As the use of robotics in total hip arthroplasty (THA) continues to gain popularity, differences in clinical outcomes when compared to manual techniques have remained unclear. This study aimed to compare postoperative complications between patients undergoing robotic-assisted techniques and manual THA for primary osteoarthritis at 90 days, 1 year, and 2 years. Methods: Using an all-payer national database, we identified 405,048 patients who underwent either robotic-assisted or manual THA for primary osteoarthritis. A propensity match was performed for age, sex, a comorbidity index, chronic kidney disease, obesity, and diabetes, resulting in 7652 patients in each cohort. We assessed postoperative outcomes, including surgical site infections, pulmonary emboli, venous thromboemboli, wound complications, dislocations, aseptic revisions, periprosthetic joint infections, and periprosthetic fractures. We completed bivariate analyses via chi-square tests to assess categorical variables. We utilized student's t-tests to compare continuous variables, including ages and comorbidities. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for complications using 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: The robotic-assisted cohort had lower rates of dislocation at 90 days (0.93 vs 1.41%, OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.48-0.88, P = .007),1 year (1.32 vs 1.92%, OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.53-0.88, P = .004), and 2 years (1.66 vs 2.1%, OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.62-0.99, P = .049). Total surgical complications were significantly lower in the robotic assisted cohort at 1 year (5.29 vs 6.16%, OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.74-0.98, P = .0205), but were similar at 90 days and 2 years. At 90 days, the rates of medical complications, including surgical site infections, pulmonary emboli, venous thromboemboli, and wound complications, were similar (all P > .05). The rates of periprosthetic joint infections, aseptic revision, periprosthetic fractures, and aseptic loosening were similar at all time points (all P > .05). Conclusions: Patients who underwent robotic-assisted THA had lower rates of dislocation at 90 days, 1 year, and 2 years. This finding supports the use of robotic assistance in THA, though further research is needed to confirm and strengthen these findings.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   What Safe Zone? The Vast Majority of Dislocated THAs Are Within the Lewinnek Safe Zone for Acetabular Component Position [J].
Abdel, Matthew P. ;
von Roth, Philipp ;
Jennings, Matthew T. ;
Hanssen, Arlen D. ;
Pagnano, Mark W. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2016, 474 (02) :386-391
[2]   Fourteen Year Follow-Up of Randomized Clinical Trials of Active Robotic-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty [J].
Bargar, William L. ;
Parise, Carol A. ;
Hankins, Andrea ;
Marlen, Natalie A. ;
Campanelli, Valentina ;
Netravali, Nathan A. .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2018, 33 (03) :810-814
[3]   Robotic Assistance for Posterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty Is Associated With Lower Risk of Revision for Dislocation When Compared to Manual Techniques [J].
Bendich, Ilya ;
Vigdorchik, Jonathan M. ;
Sharma, Abhi K. ;
Mayman, David J. ;
Sculco, Peter K. ;
Anderson, Chris ;
Della Valle, Alejandro Gonzalez ;
Su, Edwin P. ;
Jerabek, Seth A. .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2022, 37 (06) :1124-1129
[4]  
Chalmers Brian P, 2020, Arthroplast Today, V6, P749, DOI [10.1016/j.artd.2020.07.024, 10.1016/j.artd.2020.07.024]
[5]  
Chen Zhongming, 2022, Surg Technol Int, V41, P261, DOI 10.52198/22.STI.41.OS1634
[6]  
DeWal Hargovind, 2003, Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ), V32, P377
[7]   Minimum 5-Year Outcomes of Robotic-assisted Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Nested Comparison Against Manual Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score-Matched Study [J].
Domb, Benjamin G. ;
Chen, Jeffrey W. ;
Lall, Ajay C. ;
Perets, Itay ;
Maldonado, David R. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2020, 28 (20) :847-856
[8]  
Elmallah Randa K, 2015, Surg Technol Int, V26, P283
[9]   Is there increased value in robotic arm-assisted total hip arthroplasty? A NATIONWIDE OUTCOMES, TRENDS, AND PROJECTIONS ANALYSIS OF 4,699,894 CASES [J].
Emara, A. K. ;
Zhou, G. ;
Klika, A. K. ;
Koroukian, S. M. ;
Schiltz, N. K. ;
Higuera-Rueda, C. A. ;
Molloy, R. M. ;
Piuzzi, N. S. .
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2021, 103B (09) :1488-1496
[10]   Functional implant positioning in total hip arthroplasty and the role of robotic-arm assistance [J].
Fontalis, Andreas ;
Raj, Rhody David ;
Kim, Woo Jae ;
Gabr, Ayman ;
Glod, Fabrice ;
Foissey, Constant ;
Kayani, Babar ;
Putzeys, Pierre ;
Haddad, Fares S. .
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2023, 47 (02) :573-584