Generative AI and Future of Work: Enhancing utmr'Csoes Experience of a Ridehailing Application

被引:0
作者
Maurya, Harshit [1 ]
Agrahari, Amit [1 ]
Kumar, Ashwani [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Management Lucknow, Informat Technol & Syst, Lucknow, India
来源
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS | 2024年 / 55卷
关键词
Generative AI; Future of Work; Collaboration With AI; Product Management; Knowledge Workers; ALGORITHMS;
D O I
10.17705/1CAIS.05518
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The rapid advancement in generative artificial intelligence (Gen AI) technologies promises a transformative shift in the roles, skills, and task responsibilities of knowledge workers across organizations. With the increasing integration of Gen AI agents such as ChatGPT into professional settings, it is essential for students to learn how they can collaborate effectively with these agents. This teaching case is designed to immerse students in the role of a product manager to address a real-world challenge in collaboration with a Gen AI agent. Specifically, students will be required to formulate customer problems, ideate solutions, and design online experiments to test their identified problem- solution set. By having this practical experience of jointly executing varied tasks, students will gain insights into the rising importance of critical thinking skills and prompt engineering skills for harnessing the unprecedented potential of Gen AI in the workplace. Further, this experience will help students to understand the evolving roles and task responsibilities of knowledge workers in the era of Gen AI. Alternatively, this case can also be used to teach the concept of problem reframing exclusively. This case is suitable for teaching undergraduate and graduate students pursuing studies in information systems. The use of this case assumes that students have a basic understanding of digital product management.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 473
页数:17
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Worlds Most Polluted Cities 2020
[2]   Probabilistic Topic Models [J].
Blei, David M. .
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2012, 55 (04) :77-84
[3]   Can Algorithms Legitimize Discrimination? [J].
Bonezzi, Andrea ;
Ostinelli, Massimiliano .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-APPLIED, 2021, 27 (02) :447-459
[4]   Task-Dependent Algorithm Aversion [J].
Castelo, Noah ;
Bos, Maarten W. ;
Lehmann, Donald R. .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2019, 56 (05) :809-825
[5]  
Chakraborty S., 2016, MintNovember 16
[6]   People Reject Algorithms in Uncertain Decision Domains Because They Have Diminishing Sensitivity to Forecasting Error [J].
Dietvorst, Berkeley J. ;
Bharti, Soaham .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 31 (10) :1302-1314
[7]   Overcoming Algorithm Aversion: People Will Use Imperfect Algorithms If They Can (Even Slightly) Modify Them [J].
Dietvorst, Berkeley J. ;
Simmons, Joseph P. ;
Massey, Cade .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2018, 64 (03) :1155-1170
[8]   Slow response times undermine trust in algorithmic (but not human) predictions [J].
Efendic, Emir ;
Van de Calseyde, Philippe P. F. M. ;
Evans, Anthony M. .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2020, 157 :103-114
[9]   ALGORITHMS AND AUTHENTICITY [J].
Jago, Arthur S. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT DISCOVERIES, 2019, 5 (01) :38-56
[10]  
Jarrahi M. H., 2023, MIT Sloan Management Review