Assessing Jealousy: Factor Analyses, Measurement Invariance, Nomological Validity, and Longitudinal APIM Analyses of the Multidimensional Jealousy Scale

被引：0

作者：

Brauer, Kay ^{[1
]}

Proyer, Rene T. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Martin Luther Univ Halle Wittenberg, Dept Psychol, Emil Abderhalden Str 26-27, D-06099 Halle, Germany

来源：

ASSESSMENT | 2025年 / 32卷 / 07期

关键词：

jealousy; personality pathology; relationship satisfaction; romantic relationships; actor-partner interdependence model; measurement invariance; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; ADULT PLAYFULNESS; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; ROMANTIC JEALOUSY; FIT INDEXES; PERSONALITY; ATTACHMENT; MODEL; SATISFACTION; VALIDATION;

D O I：

10.1177/10731911241283927

中图分类号：

B849 [应用心理学];

学科分类号：

040203 ;

摘要：

The Multidimensional Jealousy Scale is the standard instrument to assess cognitive, emotional, and behavioral jealousy. We examined competing factor models and external correlations with broad and narrow traits. Across two studies, we analyzed four samples (Ntotal = 2,117). Confirmatory factor analysis supported the measurement model of three correlated factors in comparison to unidimensional, second-order, and bifactor models. Thus, speaking against the use of a total score. Furthermore, we found measurement invariance between romantic partners. We extended the Multidimensional Jealousy Scale (MJS)' nomological net to personality pathology and replicated prior findings of associations with broad and narrow traits. Study 2 examined longitudinal data (5- to 9-month lag) from couples. Actor-Partner Interdependence Model analyses showed that the MJS predicts facets of relationship satisfaction in actors and partners. We discuss potential avenues for revising the MJS (e.g., heteronormative item wordings).

引用

页码：1067 / 1081

页数：15

共 56 条

[1]

Ackerman R.A., 2016, Power analysis for the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model

[2]

Asparouhov T., 2018, SRMR in Mplus

[3] Jealousy and Relationship Closeness: Exploring the Good (Reactive) and Bad (Suspicious) Sides of Romantic Jealousy [J].

Attridge, Mark .

SAGE OPEN, 2013, 3 (01) :1-16

[4] Validation of the French version of the Multidimensional Jealousy Scale [J].

Brassard, Audrey ;

Brault-Labbe, Anne ;

Gasparetto, Caroline A. ;

Claing, Aurelie ;

Lussier, Yvan .

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF BEHAVIOURAL SCIENCE-REVUE CANADIENNE DES SCIENCES DU COMPORTEMENT, 2020, 52 (02) :154-158

[5]

Brauer K, 2023, Psychological Test Adaptation and Development, V4, P4, DOI [10.1027/2698-1866/a000034, 10.1027/2698-1866/a000034, DOI 10.1027/2698-1866/A000034, https://doi.org/10.1027/2698-1866/A000034]

[6]

Brauer K, 2023, International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology, V8, P227, DOI [10.1007/s41042-021-00058-8, 10.1007/s41042-021-00058-8, DOI 10.1007/S41042-021-00058-8]

[7] Testing the associations between dispositions toward ridicule and being laughed at and romantic jealousy in couples: An APIM analysis [J].

Brauer, Kay ;

Sendatzki, Rebekka ;

Proyer, Rene T. .

JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2021, 89 (05) :883-898

[8] Analyzing a German-language Expanded Form of the PhoPhiKat-45: Psychometric Properties, Factorial Structure, Measurement Invariance with the Likert-Version, and Self-Peer Convergence [J].

Brauer, Kay ;

Proyer, Rene T. .

JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2021, 103 (02) :267-277

[9]

Brennan K A., 1998, Attachment theory and close relationships, P46, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.PAIN.2006.07.020

[10] Sexual and Emotional Infidelity: Evolved Gender Differences in Jealousy Prove Robust and Replicable [J].

Buss, David M. .

PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2018, 13 (02) :155-160

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 →