Methodological Approach to the Efficiency Analysis of Regional Industrial Ecosystems

被引:0
作者
Mityakov, Evgenii S. [1 ]
Mityakov, Sergei N. [2 ]
机构
[1] MIREA Russian Technol Univ, Informat Dept, Inst Cybersecurity & Digital Technol, Moscow, Russia
[2] Nizhnii Novgorod State Tech Univ, Inst Econ & Management, Nizhnii Novgorod, Russia
关键词
regional industrial ecosystem; regional economy; processing industry; efficiency evaluation; indicator system; INNOVATION; FRAMEWORK; MATURITY; MODEL;
D O I
10.17059/ekon.reg.2024-3-15
中图分类号
K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ;
摘要
Formation of a new model of limited open sovereign economy in Russia requires the improvement of the theoretical and methodological basis for evaluating the efficiency of regional industry. The research aims to develop a methodological approach to the efficiency analysis of regional industrial ecosystems. To this end, an ecosystem approach to analysing the efficiency of regional industry was employed. In order to establish evaluation criteria, the study defined the structure of regional industrial ecosystems, comprising a set of intrinsic characteristics (development projections): scale, production potential, production infrastructure, human capital, research and development (R&D), innovation, integration potential, competitiveness, and ecology. Efficiency evaluation and comparative analysis of regional industrial ecosystems were performed using a developed system of twenty-seven indicators to provide an objective assessment of the state of industry. The paper examined five industrially developed regions of the Volga Federal District: the Republics of Bashkortostan and Tatarstan, Perm krai, Nizhny Novgorod and Samara oblasts. Testing of the authors' approach revealed the uneven development of regions according to projections and indicators of industrial ecosystems. Nizhny Novgorod oblast achieved the best result in terms of the totality of indicators, as well as in terms of scale and production potential, R&D and ecology. Perm krai is a leader according to such indicators as production infrastructure and product competitiveness. The Republic of Tatarstan leads in innovation, while the Republic of Bashkortostan has the greatest integration potential. Samara oblast is the outsider characterised by high depreciation of fixed assets and discharge of contaminated wastewater. The findings confirmed the research hypothesis about the possibility of representing processing industries of industrially developed Russian regions as industrial ecosystems.
引用
收藏
页码:836 / 850
页数:15
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Akberdina V. V., 2020, Journal of New Economy, V21, P48, DOI [10.29141/2658-5081-2020-21-3-3, DOI 10.29141/2658-5081-2020-21-3-3]
  • [2] A new comparative model for national innovation systems based on machine learning classification techniques
    Alnafrah, Ibrahim
    Zeno, Bassel
    [J]. INNOVATION AND DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 10 (01) : 45 - 66
  • [3] How do internal, market and institutional factors affect the development of eco-innovation in firms?
    Arranz, Nieves
    Lopez Arguello, Nohemi
    Fernandez de Arroyabe, Juan Carlos
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 297 (297)
  • [4] Methodology for Assessing Industrial Ecosystem Maturity in the Framework of Digital Technology Implementation
    Babkin, Aleksandr
    Glukhov, Vladimir
    Shkarupeta, Elena
    Kharitonova, Natalija
    Barabaner, Hanon
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 12 (07) : 1397 - 1406
  • [5] Entrepreneurship and sustainability: The need for innovative and institutional solutions
    Ben Youssef, Adel
    Boubaker, Sabri
    Omri, Anis
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2018, 129 : 232 - 241
  • [6] Digital transformation challenges: strategies emerging from a multi-stakeholder approach
    Brunetti, Federico
    Matt, Dominik T.
    Bonfanti, Angelo
    De Longhi, Alberto
    Pedrini, Giulio
    Orzes, Guido
    [J]. TQM JOURNAL, 2020, 32 (04) : 697 - 724
  • [7] AI-enabled business-model innovation and transformation in industrial ecosystems: A framework, model and outline for further research
    Burstrom, Thommie
    Parida, Vinit
    Lahti, Tom
    Wincent, Joakim
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2021, 127 : 85 - 95
  • [8] Davidenko L. M., 2020, Herald of the Belgorod University of Cooperation, Economics and Law, P58, DOI [10.21295/2223-5639-2020-1-58-68, DOI 10.21295/2223-5639-2020-1-58-68]
  • [9] Roles during innovation ecosystem genesis: A literature review
    Dedehayir, Ozgur
    Makinen, Saku J.
    Ortt, J. Roland
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2018, 136 : 18 - 29
  • [10] Regeneration Management Tool for Industrial Ecosystem
    Diez, Laetitia
    Marange, Pascale
    Levrat, Eric
    [J]. IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2017, 50 (01): : 12950 - 12955