Group Service or Individual Service? Differentiated Pricing for a Private or Public Service Provider

被引:0
作者
Zhou, Wenhui [1 ]
Gan, Yanhong [1 ]
Huang, Weixiang [1 ]
Guo, Pengfei [2 ]
机构
[1] South China Univ Technol, Sch Business Adm, Guangzhou 510641, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] City Univ Hong Kong, Coll Business, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Market Segmentation; Differentiated Service Pricing; Queueing Economics; Equilibrium Analysis; PRIORITY-QUEUES; EQUILIBRIUM; STRATEGIES; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1177/10591478251326390
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Facilitated by information technology and online platforms, group service has emerged in many service systems, such as one-to-many tour guide service, one-to-many tutoring courses and one-to-many medical diagnosis. We consider a service provider offering both group service and individual service and model it as a single-server queue in which customers with heterogeneous waiting costs make both joining/balking and group/individual service decisions. We solve the private provider's service assortment and pricing strategies for profit maximization (system C), whose solution leads to six equilibrium structures. Furthermore, both equilibrium service volume and service price are nonmonotonic in the potential arrival rate, which contradicts classical theory due to the follow-the-crowd (FTC) characteristics associated with group service. This leads to a counterintuitive and novel pricing implication: sustaining full coverage in a larger market may necessitate an increase in service prices when group service is offered. We then numerically show that the optimal group size is unique. Furthermore, compared with scenarios where only individual service is provided, the simultaneous provision of both services can create a win-win-win situation, particularly when the potential arrival rate is relatively high. We extend the discussion to the scenario with a welfare-maximizing objective (system S) and show that the aforementioned results continue to hold. Furthermore, we find that the socially optimal price is lower than the profit-maximizing price, resulting in a larger total number of customers served in system S. Notably, our findings suggest that system S is more likely to provide group service and achieve full market coverage than system C.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Managing Software-as-a-Service: Pricing and operations
    Li, Bo
    Kumar, Subodha
    PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2022, 31 (06) : 2588 - 2608
  • [32] A re-examination of experience service offering and regular service pricing under profit maximization
    Lian, Zhaotong
    Gu, Xinhua
    Wu, Jinbiao
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2016, 254 (03) : 907 - 915
  • [33] Human vs. robot service provider agents in service failures: comparing customer dissatisfaction and the mediating role of forgiveness and service recovery expectation
    Huang, Zuwen
    Lo, Ada
    INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & TOURISM, 2025,
  • [34] Public Logistics Information Platform Service Pricing Under the Condition of Queue Number of Visualization
    Liu, Huai-Yuan
    Chen, Jia-Juan
    Bi, Jian-Guo
    Zhang, Song-Bo
    2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT, ECONOMICS AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT (ICMESD 2016), 2016, : 219 - 224
  • [35] Service Provider Competition: Delay Cost Structure, Segmentation, and Cost Advantage
    Afanasyev, Maxim
    Mendelson, Haim
    M&SOM-MANUFACTURING & SERVICE OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2010, 12 (02) : 213 - 235
  • [36] A multi-Internet service provider game: Equilibrium, stability, and characteristics
    Fu, Hong
    Chen, Bo
    Zhang, Bin
    CONCURRENCY AND COMPUTATION-PRACTICE & EXPERIENCE, 2020, 32 (14)
  • [37] Design of services or designing for service? The application of design methodology in public service settings
    Strokosch, Kirsty
    Osborne, Stephen P.
    POLICY AND POLITICS, 2023, 51 (02): : 231 - 249
  • [38] MODEL FOR MEASURING CUSTOMER LOYALTY TOWARDS A SERVICE PROVIDER
    Skackauskiene, Ilona
    Vilkaite-Vaitone, Neringa
    Vojtovic, Sergej
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 16 (06) : 1185 - 1200
  • [39] Platform Provider Roles in Innovation in Software Service Ecosystems
    Kim, Kibae
    Altmann, Jorn
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2022, 69 (04) : 930 - 939
  • [40] Low-Value Service Use in Provider Organizations
    Schwartz, Aaron L.
    Zaslavsky, Alan M.
    Landon, Bruce E.
    Chernew, Michael E.
    McWilliams, J. Michael
    HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2018, 53 (01) : 87 - 119