Group Service or Individual Service? Differentiated Pricing for a Private or Public Service Provider

被引:0
作者
Zhou, Wenhui [1 ]
Gan, Yanhong [1 ]
Huang, Weixiang [1 ]
Guo, Pengfei [2 ]
机构
[1] South China Univ Technol, Sch Business Adm, Guangzhou 510641, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] City Univ Hong Kong, Coll Business, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Market Segmentation; Differentiated Service Pricing; Queueing Economics; Equilibrium Analysis; PRIORITY-QUEUES; EQUILIBRIUM; STRATEGIES; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1177/10591478251326390
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Facilitated by information technology and online platforms, group service has emerged in many service systems, such as one-to-many tour guide service, one-to-many tutoring courses and one-to-many medical diagnosis. We consider a service provider offering both group service and individual service and model it as a single-server queue in which customers with heterogeneous waiting costs make both joining/balking and group/individual service decisions. We solve the private provider's service assortment and pricing strategies for profit maximization (system C), whose solution leads to six equilibrium structures. Furthermore, both equilibrium service volume and service price are nonmonotonic in the potential arrival rate, which contradicts classical theory due to the follow-the-crowd (FTC) characteristics associated with group service. This leads to a counterintuitive and novel pricing implication: sustaining full coverage in a larger market may necessitate an increase in service prices when group service is offered. We then numerically show that the optimal group size is unique. Furthermore, compared with scenarios where only individual service is provided, the simultaneous provision of both services can create a win-win-win situation, particularly when the potential arrival rate is relatively high. We extend the discussion to the scenario with a welfare-maximizing objective (system S) and show that the aforementioned results continue to hold. Furthermore, we find that the socially optimal price is lower than the profit-maximizing price, resulting in a larger total number of customers served in system S. Notably, our findings suggest that system S is more likely to provide group service and achieve full market coverage than system C.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Joint pricing and service selection for service-differentiated duopoly in cognitive radio networks
    Zou, Junni
    Huang, Liwan
    IET COMMUNICATIONS, 2017, 11 (13) : 2074 - 2081
  • [2] Multichannel design and pricing in vertically differentiated expert service markets
    Du, Shaofu
    Peng, Xuefeng
    Nie, Tengfei
    Zhu, Yangguang
    MANAGERIAL AND DECISION ECONOMICS, 2023, 44 (07) : 3787 - 3813
  • [3] Pricing decisions for service platform with provider's threshold participating quantity, value-added service and matching ability
    Liu, Weihua
    Yan, Xiaoyu
    Wei, Wanying
    Xie, Dong
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2019, 122 : 410 - 432
  • [4] Two pricing mechanisms for a service provider when customers' delay costs are value-related
    Zhou, Wenhui
    Huang, Weixiang
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 87 : 600 - 610
  • [5] Public-private partnerships, management capacity and public service efficiency
    Andrews, Rhys
    Entwistle, Tom
    POLICY AND POLITICS, 2015, 43 (02): : 273 - 290
  • [6] Consumer sociability and service provider expertise influence on service relationship success
    Spake, Deborah F.
    Megehee, Carol M.
    JOURNAL OF SERVICES MARKETING, 2010, 24 (4-5) : 314 - 323
  • [7] A Mechanism for Pricing Service Guarantees
    Hajek, Bruce
    Yang, Sichao
    ITW: 2009 IEEE INFORMATION THEORY WORKSHOP ON NETWORKING AND INFORMATION THEORY, 2009, : 211 - +
  • [8] The discursive legitimation of profit in public-private service delivery
    Peda, Peeter
    Vinnari, Eija
    CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, 2020, 69
  • [9] Service Pricing with Loss-Averse Customers
    Yang, Liu
    Guo, Pengfei
    Wang, Yulan
    OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2018, 66 (03) : 761 - 777
  • [10] Keeping It Public: Defending Public Service Values in a Customer Service Age
    Jos, Philip H.
    Tompkins, Mark E.
    PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2009, 69 (06) : 1077 - 1086