Group Service or Individual Service? Differentiated Pricing for a Private or Public Service Provider

被引:0
|
作者
Zhou, Wenhui [1 ]
Gan, Yanhong [1 ]
Huang, Weixiang [1 ]
Guo, Pengfei [2 ]
机构
[1] South China Univ Technol, Sch Business Adm, Guangzhou 510641, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] City Univ Hong Kong, Coll Business, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Market Segmentation; Differentiated Service Pricing; Queueing Economics; Equilibrium Analysis; PRIORITY-QUEUES; EQUILIBRIUM; STRATEGIES; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1177/10591478251326390
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Facilitated by information technology and online platforms, group service has emerged in many service systems, such as one-to-many tour guide service, one-to-many tutoring courses and one-to-many medical diagnosis. We consider a service provider offering both group service and individual service and model it as a single-server queue in which customers with heterogeneous waiting costs make both joining/balking and group/individual service decisions. We solve the private provider's service assortment and pricing strategies for profit maximization (system C), whose solution leads to six equilibrium structures. Furthermore, both equilibrium service volume and service price are nonmonotonic in the potential arrival rate, which contradicts classical theory due to the follow-the-crowd (FTC) characteristics associated with group service. This leads to a counterintuitive and novel pricing implication: sustaining full coverage in a larger market may necessitate an increase in service prices when group service is offered. We then numerically show that the optimal group size is unique. Furthermore, compared with scenarios where only individual service is provided, the simultaneous provision of both services can create a win-win-win situation, particularly when the potential arrival rate is relatively high. We extend the discussion to the scenario with a welfare-maximizing objective (system S) and show that the aforementioned results continue to hold. Furthermore, we find that the socially optimal price is lower than the profit-maximizing price, resulting in a larger total number of customers served in system S. Notably, our findings suggest that system S is more likely to provide group service and achieve full market coverage than system C.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pricing Based Differentiated Bandwidth Service
    Li, Z. G.
    Chen, Cheng
    Soh, Y. C.
    ICIEA: 2009 4TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS AND APPLICATIONS, VOLS 1-6, 2009, : 771 - +
  • [2] Employment service: Public or private?
    Zweifel, P
    Zaborowski, C
    PUBLIC CHOICE, 1996, 89 (1-2) : 131 - 162
  • [3] PRIVATE PUBLIC-SERVICE
    不详
    NATURE, 1987, 329 (6136) : 186 - 186
  • [4] Toward IP virtual private network quality of service: A service provider perspective
    Zeng, JD
    Ansari, N
    IEEE COMMUNICATIONS MAGAZINE, 2003, 41 (04) : 113 - 119
  • [5] An auction pricing strategy for differentiated service networks
    Yang, WL
    Owen, H
    Blough, DM
    Guan, YP
    GLOBECOM'03: IEEE GLOBAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-7, 2003, : 4148 - 4152
  • [6] Public service and private service must work hand in hand
    Malin, Peter
    SCHWEIZER ARCHIV FUR TIERHEILKUNDE, 2019, 161 (02): : 79 - 79
  • [7] NURSES OF MONTREAL - FROM PRIVATE SERVICE TO PUBLIC-SERVICE
    COHEN, Y
    GELINAS, M
    HISTOIRE SOCIALE-SOCIAL HISTORY, 1989, 22 (44): : 219 - 246
  • [8] Intention to Repurchase Group Coupon Service: The Intertwined Effect of Service Quality of Vendor and Service Provider
    Lai, Hsiangchu
    Hsu, Shu-Hwa
    OUTLOOKS AND INSIGHTS ON GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, GDN 2015, 2015, 218 : 321 - 332
  • [9] Joint pricing and service selection for service-differentiated duopoly in cognitive radio networks
    Zou, Junni
    Huang, Liwan
    IET COMMUNICATIONS, 2017, 11 (13) : 2074 - 2081
  • [10] A Dynamic Pricing Model for a Maritime Transportation Service Provider
    Ugurlu, Seda
    Cosgun, Ozlem
    Ekinci, Yeliz
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS, 2012, 5 (06) : 1109 - 1119