Financial impact of low pathogenic avian influenza virus subtype H9N2 on commercial broiler chicken and egg layer production systems in Pakistan

被引:2
作者
Bin Aslam, Hassaan [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Hasler, Barbara [1 ,2 ]
Iqbal, Munir [3 ]
Yaqub, Tahir [4 ]
Alarcon, Pablo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Royal Vet Coll RVC, World Org Anim Hlth Collaborating Ctr Risk Anal Hl, Vet Epidemiol Econ & Publ Hlth Grp, London, England
[2] Royal Vet Coll RVC, Modelling Dept Pathobiol & Populat Sci, London, England
[3] Pirbright Inst, Avian Influenza & Newcastle Dis Grp, Woking, England
[4] Univ Vet & Anim Sci Lahore, Inst Microbiol, Lahore, Pakistan
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会; 英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Modelling; Avian influenza; Financial impact; Pakistan; Chicken; All-in All-out system; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; POULTRY; OUTBREAKS; VACCINATION; DISEASE; H7;
D O I
10.1016/j.prevetmed.2024.106346
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Low Pathogenic Avian Influenza (LPAI) subtype H9N2 is endemic in Pakistan and impacts poultry farming through disease related mortality, poor weight gain and reduced egg production. This study aims to estimate the farm-level financial impact of LPAI H9N2 infection on commercial broiler and layer production systems in Pakistan. A questionnaire based cross-sectional survey of 138 broiler farms and 136 layer farms in Pakistan was conducted in 2019. Primary data collected by cross-sectional survey along with expert opinion and published literature were used to parameterize five stochastic production and gross margin models for three broiler and two layer production systems: fully integrated production (FIP), partially integrated production (PIP) and independent farming production (IP) systems. Partial budget analysis were then carried out to estimate the financial impact of LPAI H9N2. Results indicate that in broiler production systems, starting with 35,000 day old chicks (DOC) per batch, the net cost of disease (million PKR/production cycle) was estimated at 4.10 (14,862 USD), 4.62 (16,747 USD) and 2.46 (8917 USD) for IP, PIP and FIP systems, respectively. The disease produced a negative gross margin (defined here as revenue minus replacement and variable costs) in IP (-53 PKR (-0.19 USD)/DOC bought) and PI (-25 PKR (-0.091 USD)/DOC bought) systems, while remained positive for FIP systems (87 PKR (0.32 USD)/DOC bought). For layer production systems, (mean flock size as 48,000 DOCs) the net cost (million PKR/production cycle) was 29.75 (107,095.21 USD) and 29.51 (106,223.45 USD) IP and PIP systems, respectively, and produced negative gross margin in both systems. The outcomes of the study highlight the vulnerability of independent and partially integrated production systems to the disease. These findings also offer a decision-making tool to the farmers and policy makers to evaluate avian influenza surveillance systems and control interventions in Pakistan.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 39 条
[11]   Using electronic tablets for data collection for healthcare service and maternal health assessments in low resource settings: lessons learnt [J].
Dickinson, Fiona M. ;
McCauley, Mary ;
Madaj, Barbara ;
van den Broek, Nynke .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2019, 19 (1)
[12]  
ESG, 2018, Epitools epidemiological calculators. Sample size to estimate a proportion or apparent prevalence with specified precision
[13]  
Frey HC, 2002, RISK ANAL, V22, P553
[14]  
Gashaw M., 2020, Int. J. Vet. Sci. Technol., V4, P15
[15]   Economic impacts of avian influenza outbreaks in Kerala, India [J].
Govindaraj, G. ;
Sridevi, R. ;
Nandakumar, S. N. ;
Vineet, R. ;
Rajeev, P. ;
Binu, M. K. ;
Balamurugan, V. ;
Rahman, H. .
TRANSBOUNDARY AND EMERGING DISEASES, 2018, 65 (02) :e361-e372
[16]   Use of antibiotics in poultry and poultry farmers- a cross-sectional survey in Pakistan [J].
Habiba, Um E. ;
Khan, Amjad ;
Mmbaga, Elia John ;
Green, Ivan Robert ;
Asaduzzaman, Muhammad .
FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 11
[17]  
Hasler B., 2015, Vet. Rec. Open, V2
[18]   Risk factors for H5 avian influenza virus prevalence on urban live bird markets in Jakarta, Indonesia-Evaluation of long-term environmental surveillance data [J].
Henning, Joerg ;
Hesterberg, Uta Walburga ;
Zenal, Farida ;
Schoonman, Luuk ;
Brum, Eric ;
McGrane, James .
PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (05)
[19]  
Huffman WE, 2001, HANDB ECON, V18, P333
[20]   Global Burden of Animal Diseases: a novel approach to understanding and managing disease in livestock and aquaculture [J].
Huntington, B. ;
Bernardo, T. M. ;
Bondad-Reantaso, M. ;
Bruce, M. ;
Devleesschauwer, B. ;
Gilbert, W. ;
Grace, D. ;
Havelaar, A. ;
Herrero, M. ;
Marsh, T. L. ;
Mesenhowski, S. ;
Pendell, D. ;
Pigott, D. ;
Shaw, A. P. ;
Stacey, D. ;
Stone, M. ;
Torgerson, P. ;
Watkins, K. ;
Wieland, B. ;
Rushton, J. .
REVUE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE-OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES, 2021, 40 (02) :567-583