Is Ceftriaxone and Metronidazole Combination Effective in the Empirical Therapy of Intra-Abdominal Infections?

被引:0
作者
Derici, Zekai Serhan [1 ]
Irmak, Caglar [2 ]
Avkan-Oguz, Vildan [2 ]
机构
[1] Dokuz Eylul Univ Hastanesi, Gen Cerrahi Anabilim Dali, Izmir, Turkiye
[2] Dokuz Eylul Univ Hastanesi, Infeksiyon Hastaliklari & Klin Mikrobiyol Anabilim, Izmir, Turkiye
关键词
ceftriaxone; metronidazole; intra-abdominal infections; empirical treatment; GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT; GASTROENTEROLOGY; DISEASES; SOCIETY;
D O I
10.36519/kd.2024.4863
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Ceftriaxone and metronidazole (CEF/MET) combination therapy is commonly used in the empirical therapy of intra-abdominal infections (IAIs). We aimed to evaluate the treatment response in patients started on empirical CEF/MET therapy and contribute current treatment data on IAIs. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients receiving parenteral antibiotic therapy in the general surgery department between 2016 and 2018. Patients aged 18 and older who received CEF/MET therapy for more than 24 hours with a diagnosis of IAI were included. Patient characteristics, antibiotic use and/or surgical history in the last three months, infection source, need for surgical intervention, and clinical and laboratory data were evaluated. Treatment response was analyzed in groups of patients with or without treatment changes. Results: 10,649 patients were evaluated; 591 (5.5%) received CEF/MET therapy, and 297 (50.2%) met the study criteria. Among them, 243 (81.8%) received only CEF/MET treatment (Group 1), while 54(18.2%) received additional antibiotics (median day 5) (Group 2). There was a statistically significant correlation between malignancy, antibiotic use in the last three months and history of surgical intervention and treatment change (p=0.001). The gallbladder (63%) or the biliopancreatic tract (12.1%) were the infection foci in 75.1% of all patients. Treatment was modified in 9.6% of the patients with an infection focused on the gallbladder and 55.6% of the patients with an infection focused on the biliopancreatic tract (p=0.001). Patients with treatment modification had more extended hospital stays and higher mortality rates (p=0.001). Conclusion: Empirical CEF/MET initiation is appropriate for IAIs with a gallbladder focus, yielding a favourable response in four out of five patients. However, CEF/MET therapy may be insufficient in patients with a biliopancreatic tract focus, a history of antibiotic use, malignancy, or surgical intervention, despite source control. Therefore, learning the source of infection and patient characteristics will contribute to the determination of the antibiotic to be selected in empirical treatment, increase treatment success, shorten the hospitalization period, and reduce mortality.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 136
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cefminox versus metronidazole plus gentamicin in intra-abdominal infections:: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial
    Torres, AJ
    Valladares, LD
    Jover, JM
    Sánchez-Pernaute, A
    Frías, J
    Carcas, AJ
    Coronel, P
    Ródenas, E
    Pérez-Balcabao, I
    Fernández-Roblas, R
    Moreno, M
    Balibrea, JL
    INFECTION, 2000, 28 (05) : 318 - 322
  • [32] Recommendations for intra-abdominal infections consensus report
    Avkan-Oguz, Vildan
    Baykam, Nurcan
    Sokmen, Selman
    Guner, Rahmet
    Agalar, Fatih
    Alp, Emine
    Dogrul, Ahmet
    Turhan, Ozge
    Agalar, Canan
    Kurtaran, Behice
    Gecim, Ibrahim Ethem
    Ozaras, Resat
    Yilmaz, Gurdal
    Akbulut, Ayhan
    Koksal, Iftihar
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 32 (04): : 306 - 321
  • [33] Complicated intra-abdominal infections: pathogens, resistance
    Bodmann, K. -F.
    CHIRURG, 2010, 81 (01): : 38 - 49
  • [34] The empiric treatment of nosocomial intra-abdominal infections
    Dupont, Herve
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2007, 11 : S1 - S6
  • [35] Cefminox versus Metronidazole plus Gentamicin in Intra-abdominal Infections: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
    A.J. Torres
    L. Díez Valladares
    J.M. Jover
    A. Sánchez-Pernaute
    J. Frías
    A.J. Carcas
    P. Coronel
    E. Ródenas
    I. Pérez-Balcabao
    R. Fernández-Roblas
    M. Moreno
    J.L. Balibrea
    Infection, 2000, 28 : 318 - 322
  • [36] Eravacycline for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections
    Montravers, Philippe
    Zappella, Nathalie
    Tran-Dinh, Alexy
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTI-INFECTIVE THERAPY, 2019, 17 (11) : 851 - 863
  • [37] Recommendations for Intra-abdominal Infections "Consensus Report"
    Oguz, Vildan Avkan
    Baykam, Nurcan
    Sokmen, Selman
    Guner, Rahmet
    Agalar, Fatih
    Mese, Emine Alp
    Dogrul, Ahmet
    Turhan, Ozge
    Agalar, Canan
    Kurtaran, Behice
    Gecim, Ibrahim Ethem
    Ozaras, Resat
    Yilmaz, Gurdal
    Akbulut, Ayhan
    Koksal, Iftihar
    MEDITERRANEAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION MICROBES AND ANTIMICROBIALS, 2016, 5
  • [38] Unmet needs in the management of intra-abdominal infections
    Montravers, Philippe
    Tashk, Parvine
    Dinh, Alexy Tran
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTI-INFECTIVE THERAPY, 2017, 15 (09) : 839 - 850
  • [39] Use of ciprofloxacin in the treatment of hospitalized patients with intra-abdominal infections
    Madan, AK
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2004, 26 (10) : 1564 - 1577
  • [40] Epidemiological analysis of intra-abdominal infections in Italy from the Italian register of complicated intra-abdominal infections-the IRIS study: a prospective observational nationwide study
    Coccolini, Federico
    Brogi, Etrusca
    Ceresoli, Marco
    Catena, Fausto
    Gurrado, Angela
    Forfori, Francesco
    Ghiadoni, Lorenzo
    Melai, Ettore
    IRIS Study Grp, Camila
    Sartelli, Massimo
    WORLD JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2025, 20 (01):