Indicators for assessing the necessity of power system flexibility: a systematic review and literature meta-analysis

被引：0

作者：

Bhuiyan, Rajon ^{[1
]}

Weissflog, Jan ^{[2
]}

Schoepf, Michael ^{[1
]}

Fridgen, Gilbert ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Luxembourg, SnT Interdisciplinary Ctr Secur Reliabil & Trust, Luxembourg City, Luxembourg

[2] Fraunhofer FIT, FIM Res Ctr, Project Grp Business & Informat Syst Engn, Augsburg, Germany

来源：

2022 18TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE EUROPEAN ENERGY MARKET, EEM | 2022年

关键词：

Flexibility; Indicators; Meta-analysis; Power system; Systematic review; ENERGY-STORAGE; INTEGRATION; WIND;

D O I：

10.1109/EEM54602.2022.9921149

中图分类号：

X [环境科学、安全科学];

学科分类号：

08 ; 0830 ;

摘要：

There are different flexibility options to align power systems to volatile feed-in of renewable electricity sources. The flexibility options differ in the dimensions of time, spatiality, and resource type. To make policy decisions on future energy systems, it is necessary to get a top-down indication of how much power system flexibility is needed. With the ongoing energy transition, there is yet no comprehensive overview of indicators that describe which dimension of flexibility will be necessary to what extent for different energy systems. Therefore, this paper provides a first overview of indicators that can be used to assess the necessity of power system flexibility. Thus, we do a systematic literature review to identify indicators that allow us to estimate the necessity of power system flexibility. We conduct a meta-analysis of these indicators and categorize them as indicators that either stand for an increasing or decreasing necessity of power system flexibility. Our paper can help inform policy, assess needed changes to system operations, increase stakeholder acceptance and investor confidence in implementing new technology and measures.

引用

页数：7

共 55 条

[11] Diakov V., 2015, 2015 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting, P1, DOI 10.1109/PESGM.2015.7286252
[12] Efimov Dmitry, 2020, E3S Web of Conferences, V216, DOI 10.1051/e3sconf/202021601025
[13] European Commission, 2017, FLEX PORTF DES FLEX
[14] A Review of Key Performance Indicators for Building Flexibility Quantification to Support the Clean Energy Transition
Farulla, Girolama Airo
Tumminia, Giovanni
Sergi, Francesco
Aloisio, Davide
Cellura, Maurizio
Antonucci, Vincenzo
Ferraro, Marco
[J]. ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (18)
[15] Quantifying demand flexibility of power-to-heat and thermal energy storage in the control of building heating systems
Finck, Christian
Li, Rongling
Kramer, Rick
Zeiler, Wim
[J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 209 : 409 - 425
[16] Technical impacts of high penetration levels of wind power on power system stability
Flynn, D.
Rather, Z.
Ardal, A.
D'Arco, S.
Hansen, A. D.
Cutululis, N. A.
Sorensen, P.
Estanquiero, A.
Gomez, E.
Menemenlis, N.
Smith, C.
Wang, Ye
[J]. WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 6 (02)
[17] A comparison of variation management strategies for wind power integration in different electricity system contexts
Goransson, Lisa
Johnsson, Filip
[J]. WIND ENERGY, 2018, 21 (10) : 837 - 854
[18] Comparison of Flexibility Factors and Introduction of A Flexibility Classification Using Advanced Heat Pump Control
Hall, Monika
Geissler, Achim
[J]. ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (24)
[19] Hillberg E., FLEXIBILITY NEEDS FU, P48
[20] Hoarau Quentin, 2018, INTERACTIONS ELECT M

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 →