Establishing predictive models for malignant and inflammatory pulmonary nodules using clinical data and CT imaging features

被引:0
作者
Zhao, Li [1 ]
Lv, Yurui [2 ]
Zhou, Ying [3 ]
Wu, Anqi [4 ]
Yang, Dengfa [5 ]
Shi, Hengfeng [6 ]
Wang, Jian [7 ]
Lin, Min [8 ]
机构
[1] Shaoxing Peoples Hosp, Dept Radiol, Shaoxing, Peoples R China
[2] Shaoxing Univ, Sch Med, Shaoxing, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Chinese Med Univ, Tongde Hosp Zhejiang Prov, Dept Resp & Crit Care Med, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Zhejiang Chinese Med Univ, Affiliated Sch 2, Dept Radiol, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[5] Taizhou Municipal Hosp, Dept Radiol, Taizhou, Peoples R China
[6] Anqing Municipal Hosp, Dept Radiol, Anqing, Peoples R China
[7] Zhejiang Chinese Med Univ, Tongde Hosp Zhejiang Prov, Dept Radiol, 234 Gucui Rd, Hangzhou 310012, Peoples R China
[8] Zhejiang Chinese Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 3, Dept Radiol, 548 Binwen Rd, Hangzhou 310013, Peoples R China
关键词
Computed tomography image (CT image); prediction model; malignant; inflammatory pulmonary nodules; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; LUNG-CANCER; PROBABILITY;
D O I
10.21037/qims-24-2338
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: The detection of pulmonary nodules has become increasingly common; however, accurate qualitative diagnosis remains a clinical challenge. This study sought to distinguish between malignant and inflammatory solid lung nodules using clinical data and computed tomography (CT) imaging features. Methods: A total of 948 patients with pulmonary nodules who underwent surgery or percutaneous biopsy from four centers were included in the study. The patients were divided into the following four groups based on nodule diameter: Group 1: nodules <= 10 mm; Group 2: nodules >10 and <= 20 mm; Group 3: nodules >20 and <= 30 mm; and Group 4: all nodules. The independent risk factors were identified and merged by univariate and multivariate analyses in the four groups to establish four models. The overall performance of the four models was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve. Differences between Models 1-3 and Model 4 were compared using the DeLong test. Results: Of the nodules, 638 were classified as malignant and 310 as inflammatory. The patients with malignant and inflammatory nodules had median ages of 64.3 +/- 9.8 and 56.0 +/- 11.9 years, respectively (P<0.001). To build the four models, 17 features were identified, of which 2 were clinical features and 15 were imaging features. Notably, the frequency of lobulation, age, multiple lesions, and satellite lesions was relatively high in the four models. The AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of Models 1-4 were 0.861 (0.803-0.921), 73.5%, 81.0%, and 78.9%; 0.902 (0.873-0.931), 82.8%, 74.7%, and 88.0%; 0.943 (0.914-0.972), 90.5%, 87.3%, and 89.7%; and 0.921 (0.903-0.940), 84.7%, 83.1%, and 86.8%; respectively. However, there were no statistically significant differences between Models 1-3 and Model 4. Conclusions: Our novel subgrouping models were able to effectively distinguish between inflammatory and malignant lung nodules using a reduced feature set. Our models could facilitate the accurate diagnosis of patients with potentially malignant lesions.
引用
收藏
页码:2957 / 2970
页数:14
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Lung cancer screening [J].
Adams, Scott J. ;
Stone, Emily ;
Baldwin, David R. ;
Vliegenthart, Rozemarijn ;
Lee, Pyng ;
Fintelmann, Florian J. .
LANCET, 2023, 401 (10374) :390-408
[2]   LUNGx Challenge for computerized lung nodule classification [J].
Armato, Samuel G., III ;
Drukker, Karen ;
Li, Feng ;
Hadjiiski, Lubomir ;
Tourassi, Georgia D. ;
Engelmann, Roger M. ;
Giger, Maryellen L. ;
Redmond, George ;
Farahani, Keyvan ;
Kirby, Justin S. ;
Clarke, Laurence P. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2016, 3 (04)
[3]  
Balekian Alex A, 2013, Ann Am Thorac Soc, V10, P629, DOI 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201305-107OC
[4]   A CT-based radiomics nomogram for prediction of lung adenocarcinomas and granulomatous lesions in patient with solitary sub-centimeter solid nodules [J].
Chen, Xiangmeng ;
Feng, Bao ;
Chen, Yehang ;
Liu, Kunfeng ;
Li, Kunwei ;
Duan, Xiaobei ;
Hao, Yixiu ;
Cui, Enming ;
Liu, Zhuangsheng ;
Zhang, Chaotong ;
Long, Wansheng ;
Liu, Xueguo .
CANCER IMAGING, 2020, 20 (01)
[5]   Diagnostic Value of Artificial Intelligence Based on CT Image in Benign and Malignant Pulmonary Nodules [J].
Du, Wang ;
He, Bei ;
Luo, Xiaojie ;
Chen, Min .
JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2022, 2022
[6]   A clinical model to estimate the pretest probability of lung cancer in patients with solitary pulmonary nodules [J].
Gould, Michael K. ;
Ananth, Lakshmi ;
Barnett, Paul G. .
CHEST, 2007, 131 (02) :383-388
[7]   Cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2022 ☆ [J].
Han, Bingfeng ;
Zheng, Rongshou ;
Zeng, Hongmei ;
Wang, Shaoming ;
Sun, Kexin ;
Chen, Ru ;
Li, Li ;
Wei, Wenqiang ;
He, Jie .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER CENTER, 2024, 4 (01) :47-53
[8]   An improved 3-D attention CNN with hybrid loss and feature fusion for pulmonary nodule classification [J].
Huang, Yao-Sian ;
Wang, Teh-Chen ;
Huang, Sheng-Zhi ;
Zhang, Jun ;
Chen, Hsin-Ming ;
Chang, Yeun-Chung ;
Chang, Ruey-Fen .
COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 2023, 229
[9]   Assessing the impact of nodule features and software algorithm on pulmonary nodule measurement uncertainty for nodules sized 20 mm or less [J].
Jirapatnakul, Artit ;
Yip, Rowena ;
Myers, Kyle J. ;
Cai, Siyang ;
Henschke, Claudia I. ;
Yankelevitz, David .
QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2024, 14 (07) :5057-5071
[10]  
Kammer MN, 2022, J THORAC ONCOL, V17, pS185