Stereotactic radiotherapy for metastatic brain tumors: A comparative analysis of dose distributions among VMAT, Helical TomoTherapy, CyberKnife, Gamma Knife, and ZAP-X

被引:0
作者
Suzuki, Toshihiro [1 ]
Saito, Masahide [2 ]
Nomura, Ryutaro [3 ]
Nemoto, Hikaru [2 ]
Yanagisawa, Naoto [4 ]
Sawada, Ryuma [3 ]
Mochizuki, Zennosuke [1 ]
Sano, Naoki [2 ]
Onishi, Hiroshi [2 ]
Takahashi, Hiroshi [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Kasugai Gen Rehabil Hosp, CyberKnife Ctr, Yamanashi, Japan
[2] Univ Yamanashi, Dept Radiol, 1110 Shimokato, Chuo, Yamanashi 4093898, Japan
[3] Kamiyacho Neurosurg Clin, Dept Neurosurg, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Aizawa Hosp, Aizawa Comprehens Canc Ctr, Div Radiat Oncol, Nagano, Japan
[5] Kasugai Gen Rehabil Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Yamanashi, Japan
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2025年
关键词
CyberKnife; Gamma Knife; Helical TomoTherapy; metastatic brain tumor; VMAT; ZAP-X; RADIATION NECROSIS; RADIOSURGERY; CONFORMITY; VOLUME;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.70046
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
This study evaluates various radiotherapy techniques for treating metastatic brain tumor (BT), focusing on non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy (NC-VMAT), coplanar VMAT (C-VMAT), Helical TomoTherapy (HT), CyberKnife (CK), Gamma Knife (GK), and ZAP-X. CT images and structures of 12 patients who underwent CK for a single BT were utilized. Twelve treatment plans were created for each planning device. All plans adopted the approach of prescription doses to planning target volume D99.5%. They were divided into stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) (prescription dose; 21-23 Gy) and stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) (prescription dose; 30-36.5 Gy) groups and the same parameters evaluated included Gradient Index (GI), Paddick Conformity Index (CI), and treatment time (t-time). In the SRS group, mean values of GI and CI values were: NC-VMAT (4.28, 0.60), C-VMAT (5.61, 0.44), HT (4.68, 0.42), CK (4.31, 0.61), GK (2.81, 0.82), and ZAP-X (2.99, 0.80). In the SRT group: NC-VMAT (3.27, 0.84), C-VMAT (3.81, 0.82), HT (3.76, 0.65), CK (2.98, 0.77), GK (2.61, 0.90), and ZAP-X (2.80, 0.84). There were no significant differences in the mean values of CI and GI between ZAP-X and GK in both groups (p > 0.05). NC-VMAT and C-VMAT had shorter t-time than other techniques in both groups. ZAP-X is relatively superior in CI and GI for small tumors, similar to GK, while differences with NC-VMAT and CK diminish as tumor volume increases. ZAP-X, CK, and GK have longer t-time than other treatment techniques, regardless of volume.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Achrol A.S., Rennert R.C., Anders C., Et al., Brain metastases, Nat Rev Dis Primers, 5, 1, (2019)
  • [2] Soffietti R., Ruda R., Mutani R., Management of brain metastases, J Neurol, 249, 10, pp. 1357-1369, (2002)
  • [3] Suh J.H., Kotecha R., Chao S.T., Ahluwalia M.S., Sahgal A., Chang E.L., Current approaches to the management of brain metastases, Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 17, 5, pp. 279-299, (2020)
  • [4] Saito M., Suzuki T., Sugama Y., Et al., Comparison of rectal dose reduction by a hydrogel spacer among 3D conformal radiotherapy, volumetric-modulated arc therapy, helical tomotherapy, CyberKnife and proton therapy, J Radiat Res, 61, 3, pp. 487-493, (2020)
  • [5] Srivastava S.P., Jani S.S., Pinnaduwage D.S., Et al., Treatment planning system and beam data validation for the ZAP-X: a novel self-shielded stereotactic radiosurgery system, Med Phys, 48, 5, pp. 2494-2510, (2021)
  • [6] Weidlich G.A., Chung W., Kolli S., Thirunarayanan I., Loysel T., Characterization of the ZAP-X® peripheral dose fall-off, Cureus, 13, 3, (2021)
  • [7] Wang J., Zheng Q., Wang Y., Et al., Dosimetric comparison of ZAP-X, Gamma Knife, and CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgery for single brain metastasis, BMC Cancer, 24, 1, (2024)
  • [8] Keener J., Tallhamer M., Eagle A., Yates J., Powers D., Stereotactic radiosurgery plan comparison study of eclipse/truebeam platform vs Zap-X, Cureus, 15, 4, (2023)
  • [9] Paddick I., Mott J., Bedford J., Et al., Benchmarking tests of contemporary SRS platforms: have technological developments resulted in improved treatment plan quality?, Pract Radiat Oncol, 13, 5, pp. e451-e459, (2023)
  • [10] Benedict S.H., Yenice K.M., Followill D., Et al., Stereotactic body radiation therapy: the report of AAPM Task Group 101, Med Phys, 37, 8, pp. 4078-4101, (2010)