Linking national primary care electronic health records to individual records from the US Census Bureau's American Community Survey: evaluating the likelihood of linkage based on patient health

被引:0
作者
Limburg, Aubrey [1 ]
Gladish, Nicole [2 ]
Rehkopf, David H. [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Phillips, Robert L. [7 ]
Udalova, Victoria [1 ]
机构
[1] US Census Bur, Suitland, MD 20746 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Populat Hlth, Palo Alto, CA 94305 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Dept Med, Palo Alto, CA 94305 USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Dept Hlth Policy, Palo Alto, CA 94305 USA
[5] Stanford Univ, Dept Pediat, Palo Alto, CA 94305 USA
[6] Stanford Univ, Dept Sociol, Palo Alto, CA 94305 USA
[7] Amer Board Family Med, Lexington, KY 40511 USA
关键词
electronic health records; data linkage; health disparities; population health; ALL-CAUSE MORTALITY; DISPARITIES; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1093/jamia/ocae269
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Objectives: To evaluate the likelihood of linking electronic health records (EHRs) to restricted individual-level American Community Survey (ACS) data based on patient health condition. Materials and Methods: Electronic health records (2019-2021) are derived from a primary care registry collected by the American Board of Family Medicine. These data were assigned anonymized person-level identifiers (Protected Identification Keys [PIKs]) at the U.S. Census Bureau. These records were then linked to restricted individual-level data from the ACS (2005-2022). We used logistic regressions to evaluate match rates for patients with health conditions across a range of severity: hypertension, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease. Results: Among more than 2.8 million patients, 99.2% were assigned person-level identifiers (PIKs). There were some differences in the odds of receiving an identifier in adjusted models for patients with hypertension (OR =1.70, 95% CI: 1.63, 1.77) and diabetes (OR =1.17, 95% CI: 1.13, 1.22), relative to those without. There were only small differences in the odds of matching to ACS in adjusted models for patients with hypertension (OR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.04), diabetes (OR = 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.03), and chronic kidney disease (OR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.06), relative to those without. Discussion and Conclusion: Our work supports evidence-building across government consistent with the Foundations for Evidence-Based Policymaking Act of 2018 and the goal of leveraging data as a strategic asset. Given the high PIK and ACS match rates, with small differences based on health condition, our findings suggest the feasibility of enhancing the utility of EHR data for research focused on health.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 104
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Global, regional, and national burden of chronic kidney disease, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017
    Bikbov, Boris
    Purcell, Carrie
    Levey, Andrew S.
    Smith, Mari
    Abdoli, Amir
    Abebe, Molla
    Adebayo, Oladimeji M.
    Afarideh, Mohsen
    Agarwal, Sanjay Kumar
    Agudelo-Botero, Marcela
    Ahmadian, Elham
    Al-Aly, Ziyad
    Alipour, Vahid
    Almasi-Hashiani, Amir
    Al-Raddadi, Rajaa M.
    Alvis-Guzman, Nelson
    Amini, Saeed
    Andrei, Tudorel
    Andrei, Catalina Liliana
    Andualem, Zewudu
    Anjomshoa, Mina
    Arabloo, Jalal
    Ashagre, Alebachew Fasil
    Asmelash, Daniel
    Ataro, Zerihun
    Atout, Maha Moh'd Wahbi
    Ayanore, Martin Amogre
    Badawi, Alaa
    Bakhtiari, Ahad
    Ballew, Shoshana H.
    Balouchi, Abbas
    Banach, Maciej
    Barquera, Simon
    Basu, Sanjay
    Bayih, Mulat Tirfie
    Bedi, Neeraj
    Bello, Aminu K.
    Bensenor, Isabela M.
    Bijani, Ali
    Boloor, Archith
    Borzi, Antonio M.
    Camera, Luis Alberto
    Carrero, Juan J.
    Carvalho, Felix
    Castro, Franz
    Catala-Lopez, Ferran
    Chang, Alex R.
    Chin, Ken Lee
    Chung, Sheng-Chia
    Cirillo, Massimo
    [J]. LANCET, 2020, 395 (10225) : 709 - 733
  • [2] Bond B., 2014, CARRA WORKING PAPER
  • [3] Using Electronic Health Records for Population Health Research: A Review of Methods and Applications
    Casey, Joan A.
    Schwartz, Brian S.
    Stewart, Walter F.
    Adler, Nancy E.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PUBLIC HEALTH, VOL 37, 2016, 37 : 61 - 81
  • [4] Social determinants of health in electronic health records and their impact on analysis and risk prediction: A systematic review
    Chen, Min
    Tan, Xuan
    Padman, Rema
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2020, 27 (11) : 1764 - 1773
  • [5] RACE AND ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY IN THE UNITED STATES: AN INTERGENERATIONAL PERSPECTIVE
    Chetty, Raj
    Hendren, Nathaniel
    Jones, Maggie R.
    Porter, Sonya R.
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2020, 135 (02) : 711 - 783
  • [6] What Caused Racial Disparities in Particulate Exposure to Fall? New Evidence from the Clean Air Act and Satellite-Based Measures of Air Quality
    Currie, Janet
    Voorheis, John
    Walker, Reed
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2023, 113 (01) : 71 - 97
  • [7] Duncan GJ., 2024, REDUCING INTERGENERA
  • [8] Measuring All-Cause Mortality With the Census Numident File
    Finlay, Keith
    Genadek, Katie R.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 111 : S141 - S148
  • [9] Genadek KR., 2021, 202102 ADEP US CENS
  • [10] Integrating Social And Medical Data To Improve Population Health: Opportunities And Barriers
    Gottlieb, Laura
    Tobey, Rachel
    Cantor, Jeremy
    Hessler, Danielle
    Adler, Nancy E.
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2016, 35 (11) : 2116 - 2123