Dark clouds of leadership: causes and consequences of toxic leadership

被引:2
作者
Akinyele, Adebisi Inako [1 ]
Chen, Ziguang [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Derby, Derby Business Sch, Kedleston Rd, Derby DE22 1GB, England
关键词
Corruption; dark side leadership; measurement dimensions; power; psychopathy; toxic leadership; SIDE; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1080/00208825.2024.2442185
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Despite the preponderance of literature on the dark side of leadership and its consequences for employees and organizations, there remains a need for more research on toxic leadership. Previous research has conceptualized toxic leadership differently, and existing measurement dimensions are not standardized and omit crucial behaviors like power quest, psychopathy, and corruption. Recent studies have shown that toxic leadership-a multifaceted and destructive leadership style characterized by negative managerial techniques-has detrimental consequences on many organizations, societies, and countries. Specifically, employees require ethical leadership to uphold healthy culture, improve psychological well-being, and sustain productivity. To address the lack of theoretical understanding, we present a narrative review that critically examines toxic leadership research to provide a comprehensive catalog using an integrative framework (antecedents, mediators, moderators, and outcomes) and identify three major challenges in this field. First, is toxic leadership effectively conceptualized? Second, is toxic leadership adequately measured, or is the measurement undermined by conceptual ambiguity? Finally, do existing studies provide a sufficient theoretical foundation to understand the causes, consequences, and cascading effects of toxic leadership? We synthesize our recommendations for rethinking the conceptualization, measurement, empirical, and theoretical study of toxic leadership, and propose a theoretical model for further research.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 91 条
  • [81] Walker S., 2020, Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, V17, P1
  • [82] Walton M., 2007, ORGANISATIONS PEOPLE, V14, P19
  • [83] Walton M., 2021, Management Insight, V17, P47, DOI [https://doi.org/10.21844/mijia.17.2.5, DOI 10.21844/MIJIA.17.2.5]
  • [84] Walton M., 2021, Management Insight - The Journal of Incisive Analysers, V17, DOI [DOI 10.21844/MIJIA.17.1.4, 10.21844/mijia.17.1.4]
  • [85] Watkins D., 2021, J ORG PSYCHOL, V21, P10, DOI [10.33423/jop.v21i2.4193, DOI 10.33423/JOP.V21I2.4193]
  • [86] Fight, Flight or Freeze: Common Responses for Follower Coping with Toxic Leadership
    Webster, Vicki
    Brough, Paula
    Daly, Kathleen
    [J]. STRESS AND HEALTH, 2016, 32 (04) : 346 - 354
  • [87] Whicker Mary., 1996, TOXIC LEADERS ORG GO
  • [88] Williams R., 2022, The Great Resignation and Toxic Leaders
  • [89] WHAT DRIVES TRICKLE-DOWN EFFECTS? A TEST OF MULTIPLE MEDIATION PROCESSES
    Wo, David X. H.
    Ambrose, Maureen L.
    Schminke, Marshall
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2015, 58 (06) : 1848 - 1868
  • [90] Evaluating Organizational Hypocrisy within Universities as Toxic Leadership Behavior
    Yaghi, Abdulfattah
    Yaghi, Majed
    [J]. PUBLIC INTEGRITY, 2021, 23 (04) : 385 - 400