Factors associated with grade progression in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Stephanie J. [1 ,2 ]
Kidder, Wesley [1 ,3 ]
Joseph, Nancy M. [4 ]
Le, Bryan Khuong [1 ]
Lindsay, Sheila [1 ,3 ]
Moon, Farhana [1 ]
Nakakura, Eric K. [1 ,5 ]
Zhang, Li [1 ,6 ]
Bergsland, Emily K. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Helen Diller Family Comprehens Canc Ctr, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Southern Calif, Keck Sch Med, Dept Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Med, Div Hematol Oncol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Pathol, San Francisco, CA USA
[5] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Surg, San Francisco, CA USA
[6] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, San Francisco, CA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor; grade progression; Ki67; serial biopsy; DOTA avidity;
D O I
10.1530/ERC-24-0203
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Grade progression of well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNETs) can occur over time, with G1/2 to G3 being the most clinically relevant form. Here, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of 66 patients with initially G1/2 panNET (median initial Ki67, 4.6%). Patients were followed up for a median 6.8 years and had a median of two metachronous tumor biopsies over their disease course. 34.8% of patients underwent any form of grade progression, including G1 to G2/3 and G2 to G3, while 24.2% demonstrated G1/2 to G3 grade progression. Over a median 2.3 years, G1/2 to G3 grade progressors experienced a median Ki67 change of +27.0% (range, +6.4 to +48.7%). Subsequent biopsies showing progression to G3 had a median Ki67 value of 31.0% (range, 21.0-60.0%) and were more often performed following suspicious clinical behavior (75.0%) rather than routinely at the time of scheduled procedure/surgery (25.0%). Similar to prior studies, G1/2 to G3 grade progressors had worse overall survival from the time of metastatic disease (median, 4.8 years vs not reached for stably G1/2 disease; P = 0.002). Heavier pretreatment and heterogeneity or lack of uptake on somatostatin receptor imaging was independently associated with progression to G3. In the largest study of metachronous panNET biopsies to date, our findings show that baseline biopsies suggesting G1/2 disease may not accurately reflect future disease status, highlighting the possible limitations of using archived tissue to stratify patients into trials and/or choose future therapy. Additional work is needed to better understand the impact of prior therapies on grade progression and how to identify which lesions to best follow up for repeat biopsy.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Consensus on the clinical diagnosis and treatment of grade 3 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
    Chen, Jie
    Wu, Wenming
    Bai, Chunmei
    Chi, Yihebali
    Huo, Li
    Jiang, Liming
    Ji, Yuan
    Luo, Jie
    Li, Jie
    Li, Jingnan
    Lou, Wenhui
    Shao, Chenghao
    Shen, Lin
    Wang, Feng
    Wang, Yu
    Xue, Ling
    Xu, Jin
    Yuan, Chunhui
    Yu, Xianjun
    Yin, Xiaoyu
    Zhao, Hong
    Zhu, Xiongzeng
    Zhao, Yupei
    JOURNAL OF PANCREATOLOGY, 2024, 7 (02) : 97 - 105
  • [22] Consensus on the clinical diagnosis and treatment of grade 3 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
    Chen Jie
    Wu Wenming
    Bai Chunmei
    Chi Yihebali
    Huo Li
    Jiang Liming
    Ji Yuan
    Luo Jie
    Li Jie
    Li Jingnan
    Lou Wenhui
    Shao Chenghao
    Shen Lin
    Wang Feng
    Wang Yu
    Xue Ling
    Xu Jin
    Yuan Chunhui
    Yu Xianjun
    Yin Xiaoyu
    Zhao Hong
    Zhu Xiongzeng
    Zhao Yupei
    胰腺病学杂志(英文), 2024, 07 (02)
  • [23] Indications for Surgical Resection in Low-Grade Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Fitzgerald, Timothy L.
    Mosquera, Catalina
    Vora, Haily S.
    Vohra, Nasreen A.
    Zervos, Emmanuel E.
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2016, 82 (08) : 737 - 742
  • [24] Factors Associated With Survival of Veterans With Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Balmadrid, Bryan L.
    Thomas, Catherine M.
    Coffman, Cynthia J.
    Liddle, Rodger A.
    Fisher, Deborah A.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 140 (05) : S723 - S724
  • [25] Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Batcher, Elizabeth
    Madaj, Paul
    Gianoukakis, Andrew G.
    ENDOCRINE RESEARCH, 2011, 36 (01) : 35 - 43
  • [26] Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Chorna, N.
    Lukashenko, A.
    Kolesnik, O.
    Ostapenko, Y.
    Patsko, V
    NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, 2019, 108 : 239 - 239
  • [27] Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
    Perri, Giampaolo
    Prakash, Laura R.
    Katz, Matthew H. G.
    CURRENT OPINION IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 35 (05) : 468 - 477
  • [28] Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
    Kolesnik, O.
    Lukashenko, A.
    Chorna, N.
    Ostapenko, Y.
    Patsko, N.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2019, 30
  • [29] Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
    Varas-Lorenzo, Modesto J.
    Cugat-Andorra, Esteban
    Capdevila-Castillon, Jaume
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS, 2017, 109 (06) : 481 - U101
  • [30] Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
    Shrikhande S.V.
    Sirohi B.
    Goel M.
    Barreto S.G.
    Indian Journal of Gastroenterology, 2013, 32 (1) : 3 - 17