Factors associated with grade progression in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Stephanie J. [1 ,2 ]
Kidder, Wesley [1 ,3 ]
Joseph, Nancy M. [4 ]
Le, Bryan Khuong [1 ]
Lindsay, Sheila [1 ,3 ]
Moon, Farhana [1 ]
Nakakura, Eric K. [1 ,5 ]
Zhang, Li [1 ,6 ]
Bergsland, Emily K. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Helen Diller Family Comprehens Canc Ctr, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Southern Calif, Keck Sch Med, Dept Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Med, Div Hematol Oncol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Pathol, San Francisco, CA USA
[5] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Surg, San Francisco, CA USA
[6] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, San Francisco, CA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor; grade progression; Ki67; serial biopsy; DOTA avidity;
D O I
10.1530/ERC-24-0203
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Grade progression of well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNETs) can occur over time, with G1/2 to G3 being the most clinically relevant form. Here, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of 66 patients with initially G1/2 panNET (median initial Ki67, 4.6%). Patients were followed up for a median 6.8 years and had a median of two metachronous tumor biopsies over their disease course. 34.8% of patients underwent any form of grade progression, including G1 to G2/3 and G2 to G3, while 24.2% demonstrated G1/2 to G3 grade progression. Over a median 2.3 years, G1/2 to G3 grade progressors experienced a median Ki67 change of +27.0% (range, +6.4 to +48.7%). Subsequent biopsies showing progression to G3 had a median Ki67 value of 31.0% (range, 21.0-60.0%) and were more often performed following suspicious clinical behavior (75.0%) rather than routinely at the time of scheduled procedure/surgery (25.0%). Similar to prior studies, G1/2 to G3 grade progressors had worse overall survival from the time of metastatic disease (median, 4.8 years vs not reached for stably G1/2 disease; P = 0.002). Heavier pretreatment and heterogeneity or lack of uptake on somatostatin receptor imaging was independently associated with progression to G3. In the largest study of metachronous panNET biopsies to date, our findings show that baseline biopsies suggesting G1/2 disease may not accurately reflect future disease status, highlighting the possible limitations of using archived tissue to stratify patients into trials and/or choose future therapy. Additional work is needed to better understand the impact of prior therapies on grade progression and how to identify which lesions to best follow up for repeat biopsy.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] High-Grade Progression Confers Poor Survival in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Botling, Johan
    Lamarca, Angela
    Bajic, Duska
    Norlen, Olov
    Lonngren, Vincent
    Kjaer, Josefine
    Eriksson, Barbro
    Welin, Staffan
    Hellman, Per
    Rindi, Guido
    Skogseid, Britt
    Crona, Joakim
    NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, 2020, 110 (11-12) : 891 - 898
  • [2] Multimodal Management of Grade 1 and 2 Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Marchese, Ugo
    Gaillard, Martin
    Pellat, Anna
    Tzedakis, Stylianos
    Abou Ali, Einas
    Dohan, Anthony
    Barat, Maxime
    Soyer, Philippe
    Fuks, David
    Coriat, Romain
    CANCERS, 2022, 14 (02)
  • [3] Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Radiographic Calcifications Correlate with Grade and Metastasis
    George A. Poultsides
    Lyen C. Huang
    Yijun Chen
    Brendan C. Visser
    Reetesh K. Pai
    R. Brooke Jeffrey
    Walter G. Park
    Ann M. Chen
    Pamela L. Kunz
    George A. Fisher
    Jeffrey A. Norton
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2012, 19 : 2295 - 2303
  • [4] Grade Progression and Intrapatient Tumor Heterogeneity as Potential Contributors to Resistance in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Varghese, Diana Grace
    Del Rivero, Jaydira
    Bergsland, Emily
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (14)
  • [5] MK2 Promotes the Development and Progression of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Mediated by Macrophages and Metabolomic Factors
    Jacenik, Damian
    Lebish, Eric J.
    Beswick, Ellen J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2022, 23 (21)
  • [6] EPB41L5 is Associated With the Metastatic Potential of Low-grade Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Saller, James
    Seydafkan, Shabnam
    Shahid, Mohammad
    Gadara, Manoj
    Cives, Mauro
    Eschrich, Steven A.
    Boulware, David
    Strosberg, Jonathan R.
    Aejaz, Nasir
    Coppola, Domenico
    CANCER GENOMICS & PROTEOMICS, 2019, 16 (05) : 309 - 318
  • [7] Predictive Factors for Progression Free Survival (PFS) in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (PNET) Treated with Sunitinib
    Jimenez-Fonseca, P.
    Carmona, A.
    Solis, M.
    Faez, L.
    Ruiz, A.
    Rodriguez, D.
    Sanchez, M.
    Li, W.
    Menendez, M.
    Vieitez, J.
    Garrido, M.
    NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, 2014, 99 (3-4) : 275 - 275
  • [8] Risk factors for complications after surgery for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
    van Beek, D. J.
    Takkenkamp, T.
    de Kleine, R.
    Walenkamp, A.
    Klaase, J.
    Nijkamp, M.
    Valk, G. D.
    Molenaar, I. Q.
    Hagendoorn, J.
    Rinkes, Borel, I
    Hoogwater, F.
    Vriens, M.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, 2022, 34 : 208 - 208
  • [9] Sunitinib in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
    Raymond, Eric
    Hammel, Pascal
    Dreyer, Chantal
    Maatescu, Christian
    Hentic, Olivia
    Ruszniewski, Philippe
    Faivre, Sandrine
    TARGETED ONCOLOGY, 2012, 7 (02) : 117 - 125
  • [10] Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Halperin, Daniel M.
    Kulke, Matthew H.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2012, 41 (01) : 119 - +