Assessment of residential renewable energy investment under dynamic market environment: Aspect from household benefits

被引:1
作者
Xu, Qian [1 ]
Chen, Changxu [2 ]
Huang, Xinli [3 ]
Yang, Weiyao [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Sch Civil Aerosp & Design Engn, Bristol BS8 1TR, England
[2] UCL, BARTLETT SCH, London WC1E 6BT, England
[3] Univ Sheffield, Sheffield Univ Management Sch, Sheffield S10 2TN, England
[4] Keio Univ, Grad Sch Media & Governance, 5322 Endo, Fujisawa, Kanagawa 2520882, Japan
关键词
Renewable energy investment; Solar photovoltaic (PV) systems; Market risk; Policy risk; Geometric Brownian motion (GBM); Sensitivity analysis; PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER-GENERATION; ECONOMIC RISK ANALYSIS; SOLAR POWER; PV SYSTEMS; OPTIONS; UNCERTAINTY; VALUATION; SUPPORT; EFFICIENCY; POLICIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124060
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The adoption of residential renewable energy is pivotal for achieving the 'Net Zero' goal, yet financial assessments of household investments in this area remain complex due to dynamic market conditions. This study introduces a novel closed-form financial valuation framework for residential solar photovoltaic (PV) systems, explicitly addressing the uncertainties of electricity market price fluctuations (market risk) and energy policy changes (policy risk) using Geometric Brownian Motion (GBM). A case study in France demonstrates the framework's application, revealing that the discount rate is the most influential factor in solar PV valuation, followed by system lifespan and policy-driven Feed-in Tariff (FiT) rates. Sensitivity analyses further highlight how these variables interact to influence investment outcomes under various market scenarios. Key findings include (1) the identification of critical thresholds for solar PV investments, ensuring financial viability even under fluctuating conditions; (2) the validation of GBM as an effective tool for capturing long-term market and policy dynamics; and (3) actionable policy recommendations emphasizing market efficiency, policy stability, and end-of-life management. These insights contribute to advancing both household investment decision-making and policy design, addressing a significant gap in understanding the economic dynamics of residential renewable energy adoption. By bridging theoretical valuation models with empirical evidence, this research provides practical guidance for promoting decentralized renewable energy systems globally.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 81 条
  • [1] Feasibility analysis of community-based PV systems for residential districts: A comparison of on-site centralized and distributed PV installations
    Aghamolaei, Reihaneh
    Shamsi, Mohammad Haris
    O'Donnell, James
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 157 : 793 - 808
  • [2] Economic risk analysis of decentralized renewable energy infrastructures - A Monte Carlo Simulation approach
    Arnold, Uwe
    Yildiz, Oezguer
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2015, 77 : 227 - 239
  • [3] No real option for solar in Ireland: A real option valuation of utility scale solar investment in Ireland
    Assereto, Martina
    Byrne, Julie
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2021, 143
  • [4] The Implications of Policy Uncertainty on Solar Photovoltaic Investment
    Assereto, Martina
    Byrne, Julie
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (23)
  • [5] What matters for private investment in renewable energy?
    Azhgaliyeva, Dina
    Beirne, John
    Mishra, Ranjeeta
    [J]. CLIMATE POLICY, 2023, 23 (01) : 71 - 87
  • [6] Adoption of residential solar power under uncertainty: Implications for renewable energy incentives
    Bauner, Christoph
    Crago, Christine L.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2015, 86 : 27 - 35
  • [7] Effects of partial shading on energy and exergy efficiencies for photovoltaic panels
    Bayrak, Fatih
    Erturk, Gamze
    Oztop, Hakan F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 164 : 58 - 69
  • [8] Solar Grid Parity dynamics in Italy: A real option approach
    Biondi, Tommaso
    Moretto, Michele
    [J]. ENERGY, 2015, 80 : 293 - 302
  • [9] Renewable energy investments under different support schemes: A real options approach
    Boomsma, Trine Krogh
    Meade, Nigel
    Fleten, Stein-Erik
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2012, 220 (01) : 225 - 237
  • [10] Borenstein Severin, 2008, CSEM Working Paper 176