Forecasting future earthquakes with deep neural networks: application to California

被引:0
作者
Zhang, Ying [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhan, Chengxiang [4 ]
Huang, Qinghua [2 ]
Sornette, Didier [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol Beijing, Sch Automat & Elect Engn, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ, Dept Geophys, Sch Earth & Space Sci, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Engn Res Ctr Ind Spectrum Imaging, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[4] China Univ Geosci Beijing, Sch Sci, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[5] Southern Univ Sci & Technol SUSTech, Inst Risk Anal Predict & Management Risks X, Shenzhen 518055, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Machine learning; Probabilistic forecasting; Earthquake interaction; forecasting and prediction; Statistical seismology; SHORT-TERM; SEISMICITY; MODELS; STRATEGIES; PREDICTION; STATE; LAW;
D O I
10.1093/gji/ggae373
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
We use the spatial map of the logarithm of past estimated released earthquake energies as input of fully convolutional networks (FCN) to forecast future earthquakes. This model is applied to California and compared with an elaborated version of the epidemic type aftershock sequence (ETAS) model. Our long-term earthquake forecast simulations show that the FCN model is close to the ETAS model in forecasting earthquakes with M >= 3.0 , 4.0 , and 5.0 according to the Molchan diagram. Moreover, training and implementing the FCN model is 2000-4000 times faster than calibrating the ETAS model and generating its probabilistic forecasts. The FCN model is straightforward in terms of its neural network structure and feature engineering. It does not require extensive knowledge of statistical seismology or the analysis of earthquake catalogue completeness. Using the earthquake catalogue with M >= 0 as FCN input can enhance the model's performance in some time-magnitude forecasting windows.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 95
页数:15
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   Application of Artificial Intelligence in Predicting Earthquakes: State-of-the-Art and Future Challenges [J].
Al Banna, Md. Hasan ;
Abu Taher, Kazi ;
Kaiser, M. Shamim ;
Mahmud, Mufti ;
Rahman, Md. Sazzadur ;
Hosen, A. S. M. Sanwar ;
Cho, Gi Hwan .
IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 :192880-192923
[2]   Earthquake prediction in California using regression algorithms and cloud-based big data infrastructure [J].
Asencio-Cortes, G. ;
Morales-Esteban, A. ;
Shang, X. ;
Martinez-Alvarez, F. .
COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 2018, 115 :198-210
[3]   Machine learning and earthquake forecasting-next steps [J].
Beroza, Gregory C. ;
Segou, Margarita ;
Mostafa Mousavi, S. .
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 12 (01)
[4]   An observational test of the critical earthquake concept [J].
Bowman, DD ;
Ouillon, G ;
Sammis, CG ;
Sornette, A ;
Sornette, D .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 1998, 103 (B10) :24359-24372
[5]  
Brier Glenn W., 1950, MONTHLY WEATHER REV
[6]   Deep learning of the aftershock hysteresis effect based on the elastic dislocation theory [J].
Chen, Jin ;
Tang, Hong ;
Chen, Wenkai .
NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2020, 20 (11) :3117-3134
[7]   Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data [J].
Clauset, Aaron ;
Shalizi, Cosma Rohilla ;
Newman, M. E. J. .
SIAM REVIEW, 2009, 51 (04) :661-703
[8]   Using Deep Learning for Flexible and Scalable Earthquake Forecasting [J].
Dascher-Cousineau, Kelian ;
Shchur, Oleksandr ;
Brodsky, Emily E. ;
Guennemann, Stephan .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2023, 50 (17)
[9]   Deep learning of aftershock patterns following large earthquakes [J].
DeVries, Phoebe M. R. ;
Viegas, Fernanda ;
Wattenberg, Martin ;
Meade, Brendan J. .
NATURE, 2018, 560 (7720) :632-+
[10]   Real-time forecasts of tomorrow's earthquakes in California [J].
Gerstenberger, MC ;
Wiemer, S ;
Jones, LM ;
Reasenberg, PA .
NATURE, 2005, 435 (7040) :328-331