Evaluation of condylar dimension and position following rapid maxillary expansion with tooth-or tooth-bone-borne appliances

被引:0
作者
Eglenen, Merve Nur [1 ]
Akan, Seden [1 ]
Germec-Cakan, Derya [1 ]
机构
[1] Yeditepe Univ, Dept Orthodont, Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
Temporomandibular joint; Expansion; Appliances; Computed tomography; FUNCTIONAL POSTERIOR CROSSBITE; TEMPOROMANDIBULAR-JOINTS; FOSSA RELATIONSHIP; DENTAL CHANGES; SKELETAL; EXPANDERS; OUTCOMES; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.4041/kjod24.142
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess and compare changes in the dimension and position of the mandibular condyle after tooth-borne (Hyrax) and tooth-bone-borne (Hybrid Hyrax) expansion. Methods: Twenty-five patients who underwent expansion with either tooth-borne appliances (8 girls, 5 boys; mean age 14.3 +/- 2.3 years) or tooth-bone-borne appliances (6 girls, 6 boys; mean age 13.8 +/- 2.2 years) were examined. Condylar and glenoid fossa morphology before (T0) and 3 months after (T1) expansion were evaluated using cone-beam computed tomography. Condylar measurements (anterior, posterior, and superior joint spaces; condylar height, length, and width), along with sagittal and vertical skeletal and maxillary transversal measurements, were analyzed using Dolphin Imaging software. Wilcoxon and Paired t tests were used for T0 and T1 evaluations, and the Mann-Whitney U test for intergroup comparisons. Results: At both T0 and T1, no statistically significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of condylar dimensions or the position of the condyle within the glenoid fossa. Maxillary transversal measurements increased after expansion in both groups (P < 0.01), with a significantly greater increase in first premolar width in the Hyrax group (P < 0.05). The vertical position of the posterior teeth showed no noteworthy changes (P > 0.05), except for the right second premolar. Temporomandibular joint measurements did not significantly change in either group after treatment (P > 0.05). Conclusions: Neither tooth-borne nor toothbone-borne expansion caused significant changes in the condylar dimensions and position at the end of treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:422 / 431
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Haas AJ., Palatal expansion: just the beginning of dentofacial orthopedics, Am J Orthod, 57, pp. 219-255, (1970)
[2]  
Mehta S, Chen PJ, Vich ML, Upadhyay M, Tadi-nada A, Yadav S., Bone-anchored versus tooth-anchored expansion appliances: long-term effects on the condyle-fossa relationship, J World Fed Orthod, 10, pp. 144-154, (2021)
[3]  
Lin L, Ahn HW, Kim SJ, Moon SC, Kim SH, Nelson G., Tooth-borne vs bone-borne rapid maxillary expand-ers in late adolescence, Angle Orthod, 85, pp. 253-262, (2015)
[4]  
Baysal A, Uysal T, Veli I, Ozer T, Karadede I, Heki-moglu S., Evaluation of alveolar bone loss following rapid maxillary expansion using cone-beam computed tomography, Korean J Orthod, 43, pp. 83-95, (2013)
[5]  
Kim YH, Yang SM, Kim S, Lee JY, Kim KE, Gianelly AA, Et al., Midpalatal miniscrews for orthodontic anchorage: factors affecting clinical success, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 137, pp. 66-72, (2010)
[6]  
Garib D, Miranda F, Palomo JM, Pugliese F, da Cunha Bastos JC, Dos Santos AM, Et al., Orthopedic outcomes of hybrid and conventional Hyrax ex-panders, Angle Orthod, 91, pp. 178-186, (2021)
[7]  
McLeod L, Hernandez IA, Heo G, Lagravere MO., Condylar positional changes in rapid maxillary expansion assessed with cone-beam computer to-mography, Int Orthod, 14, pp. 342-356, (2016)
[8]  
Lam PH, Sadowsky C, Omerza F., Mandibular asym-metry and condylar position in children with unilateral posterior crossbite, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 115, pp. 569-575, (1999)
[9]  
Nerder PH, Bakke M, Solow B., The functional shift of the mandible in unilateral posterior crossbite and the adaptation of the temporomandibular joints: a pilot study, Eur J Orthod, 21, pp. 155-166, (1999)
[10]  
Hesse KL, Artun J, Joondeph DR, Kennedy DB., Changes in condylar postition and occlusion associated with maxillary expansion for correction of functional unilateral posterior crossbite, Am J Or-thod Dentofacial Orthop, 111, pp. 410-418, (1997)