Safety and Postoperative Outcomes of Transoral Surgery for Oropharyngeal Carcinoma in Older Adults

被引:1
|
作者
Costantino, Andrea [1 ]
Haughey, Bruce [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Alamoudi, Uthman [1 ]
Biskup, Mathew [1 ]
Magnuson, Jeffery Scott [1 ]
机构
[1] AdventHealth Orlando, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, 410 Celebrat Pl, Celebration, FL 34747 USA
[2] Univ S Florida, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Morsani Coll Med, Tampa, Romania
[3] Univ Auckland, Dept Surg, Sch Med & Allied Hlth Sci, Auckland, New Zealand
关键词
ROBOTIC SURGERY; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; NECK-CANCER; HEAD; COMORBIDITY; SURVIVAL; INDEX;
D O I
10.1001/jamaoto.2024.2596
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Importance Transoral surgery (TOS) has become the primary surgical treatment for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). However, despite the increasing incidence of OPSCC in older patients, data regarding the safety and postoperative outcomes of TOS in this subgroup are lacking. Objective This study aimed to evaluate the safety and postoperative outcomes of TOS in patients with OPSCC aged 70 years or older compared with younger individuals. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study included patients with microscopic diagnostic confirmation of invasive OPSCC diagnosed between 2010 and 2021. Data were obtained from the US National Cancer Database. Data were analyzed in March 2024. Exposure Minimally invasive TOS not converted to an open approach. Main Outcomes and Measures Multivariable logistic and linear regression models were constructed to compare postoperative outcomes, adjusting for baseline patient and tumor characteristics. The results are reported as odds ratios (ORs) or mean differences with corresponding 95% CI, as appropriate. Results A total of 10 430 patients (mean [SD] age, 60.7 [9.6] years; 8744 [83.8%] male) were included, with 1808 patients (17.3%) aged at least 70 years. No clinically meaningful difference was observed in terms of postoperative mortality at 30 days (adjusted OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.65-2.33) or 90 days (adjusted OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.65-1.87). Patients aged 70 years or older were less likely to undergo adjuvant radiotherapy (adjusted OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.57-0.83) and chemotherapy (adjusted OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.51-0.77). In addition, the adjuvant treatment was more frequently not administered in the older population due to patient refusal or comorbidities, despite being clinically indicated (radiotherapy: adjusted OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.05-1.77; chemotherapy: adjusted OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.17-2.45). No meaningful differences were observed regarding the remaining study outcomes, apart from a slightly longer hospitalization time for older patients, with an adjusted mean difference of 0.39 (95% CI, 0.05-0.74) days. Conclusions and Relevance Findings from this study suggest that age was not independently associated with postoperative mortality in older patients undergoing TOS for OPSCC. However, older patients less frequently received adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy compared with younger patients, and future studies should be conducted to examine the impact on long-term survival.
引用
收藏
页码:879 / 886
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Transoral Robotic Surgery for Oropharyngeal Cancer
    Paleri, Vinidh
    Fox, Hannah
    Winter, Stuart
    ORL-JOURNAL FOR OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2018, 80 (3-4): : 156 - 170
  • [22] Anatomic Landmarks in Transoral Oropharyngeal Surgery
    Mirapeix, Rosa M.
    Tobed Secall, Marc
    Pollan Guisasola, Carlos
    Garcia Lorenzo, Jacinto
    Lluansi Planella, Jordi
    Vina Soria, Constanza
    Palau Viarnes, Mar
    Viros Porcuna, David
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 30 (02) : E101 - E106
  • [23] Transoral robotic surgery adoption and safety in treatment of oropharyngeal cancers
    Oliver, Jamie R.
    Persky, Michael J.
    Wang, Binhuan
    Duvvuri, Umamaheswar
    Gross, Neil D.
    Vaezi, Alec E.
    Morris, Luc G. T.
    Givi, Babak
    CANCER, 2022, 128 (04) : 685 - 696
  • [24] Velopharyngeal incompetence following transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal carcinoma: A scoping review
    Charters, Emma
    Pelham, Claire
    Novakovic, Daniel
    Madill, Cate
    Clark, Jonathan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY, 2023, 25 (04) : 540 - 548
  • [25] Swallowing after transoral surgery for oropharyngeal cancer: comparison with primary chemoradiotherapy outcomes
    Dawe, Nicholas
    O'Hara, James
    CURRENT OPINION IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY & HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2017, 25 (02) : 101 - 107
  • [26] Transoral robotic surgery versus nonrobotic resection of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
    Chillakuru, Yeshwant
    Benito, Daniel A.
    Strum, David
    Mehta, Varun
    Saini, Prashant
    Shim, Timothy
    Darwish, Christina
    Joshi, Arjun S.
    Thakkar, Punam
    Goodman, Joseph F.
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2021, 43 (07): : 2259 - 2273
  • [27] Oncological and functional outcomes of transoral surgery for the treatment of oropharyngeal cancer
    Chauhan, P.
    Byrne, H.
    Taylor, E.
    Sheahan, P.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2015, 184 (04) : 825 - 830
  • [28] Transoral Robotic Surgery for Oropharyngeal and Tongue Cancer in the United States
    Chung, Thomas K.
    Rosenthal, Eben L.
    Magnuson, J. Scott
    Carroll, William R.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2015, 125 (01) : 140 - 145
  • [29] Outcomes and xerostomia after postoperative radiotherapy for oral and oropharyngeal carcinoma
    Wang, Zhong-He
    Yan, Chao
    Zhang, Zhi-Yuan
    Zhang, Chen-Ping
    Hu, Hai-Sheng
    Tu, Wen-Yong
    Kirwan, Jessica
    Mendenhall, William M.
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2014, 36 (10): : 1467 - 1473
  • [30] Oropharyngeal cancer treatment: the role of transoral surgery
    Hinni, Michael L.
    Nagel, Thomas
    Howard, Brittany
    CURRENT OPINION IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY & HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2015, 23 (02) : 132 - 138