The pathophysiology of dysphagia post-lung transplant: A systematic review

被引:0
作者
Smaoui, Sana [1 ]
Cummins, Elly [2 ]
Mena, Maryah [2 ]
Scott, Summer [2 ]
Tobar-Fredes, Rodrigo [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Kuwait Univ, Fac Allied Hlth Sci, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Hearing & Speech Sci, Safat 13060, Kuwait
[2] George Washington Univ, Dept Speech Language & Hearing Sci, Washington, DC USA
[3] Univ Chile, Dept Speech Language & Hearing Sci, Santiago, Chile
[4] Hosp Trabajador, Speech & Language Pathol Unit, Santiago, Chile
来源
LARYNGOSCOPE INVESTIGATIVE OTOLARYNGOLOGY | 2024年 / 9卷 / 05期
关键词
dysphagia; lung transplant; oropharynx; OROPHARYNGEAL DYSPHAGIA; GASTROESOPHAGEAL-REFLUX; PENETRATION-ASPIRATION; COUGH REFLEX; COMPLICATIONS; IMPAIRMENT;
D O I
10.1002/lio2.70022
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
PurposeOne major consequence of lung transplantation is the development of oropharyngeal dysphagia. This systematic review aims to appraise and synthesize the available evidence of the use of instrumental assessments to outline the characteristics of post-lung transplant dysphagia.MethodsFollowing the identification of appropriate search terms for the question, a literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and the Health and Medical Collection of Proquest Research Library and included records between inception and September 14, 2023. Search strategies included the use of text words and subject headings (e.g., MeSH and Index terms) related to (1) dysphagia or swallowing (swallow*, deglutition disorder*), (2) lung transplant (lung transplant*, post-operative, post-lung), and (3) complications (adverse effects, *complications, treatment outcome).ResultsThe literature search strategy yielded a total of 883 studies from the electronic database search, with no additional records identified through other sources. After the removal of duplicates (n = 96), a total of 787 studies were screened through title and abstracts which eliminated 775 studies. Six studies were ultimately included in the systematic review. The selected articles included patients who underwent lung transplantation and all but one study utilized a retrospective design. A lack of transparency regarding instrumental evaluation protocols (videofluoroscopic [VFSS] and Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing [FEES]) including the number and bolus types used during the instrumental evaluations appeared as a theme in the studies included. The Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) was systematically utilized to measure dysphagia safety outcome. Handling of the PAS scale was not consistent across studies, however penetration or aspiration ranged from 52.4% up to 100%. Additionally, silent aspiration rates ranged from 14.2% to 61.9%.ConclusionsThis review sought to describe the post-operative swallowing function and its physiological parameters following lung transplantation. We examined the results reported and the methods utilized in obtaining these results in the existing literature. Limited reporting practices for physiological parameters were found, however the airway invasion was reported in all studies with variation in degrees of swallowing safety related deficits, with PAS being the most widely used scale to describe airway invasion depth and response. Future studies exploring dysphagia outcomes post-lung transplant should comment on the altered physiological mechanisms of the swallow to further expand on the physiological deficits observed following transplantation in this group and allow for treatment planning.Level of evidenceLevel 1. One major consequence of lung transplantation is the development of oropharyngeal dysphagia. This systematic review aims to appraise and synthesize the available evidence using instrumental assessments to outline the characteristics of post-lung transplant dysphagia. image
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Allen E., 2024, StatPearls Internet
  • [2] [Anonymous], Covidence systematic review software
  • [3] [Anonymous], Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network website
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2023, Framework for rigor and transparency in research on swallowing. The Frontiers Framework Internet
  • [5] Assessing oropharyngeal dysphagia after lung transplantation: Altered swallowing mechanisms and increased morbidity
    Atkins, B. Zane
    Trachtenberg, Melissa S.
    Prince-Petersen, Rebecca
    Vess, Gina
    Bush, Errol L.
    Balsara, Keki R.
    Lin, Shu S.
    Davis, R. Duane, Jr.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 26 (11) : 1144 - 1148
  • [6] Impact of Oropharyngeal Dysphagia on Long-Term Outcomes of Lung Transplantation
    Atkins, B. Zane
    Petersen, Rebecca P.
    Daneshmand, Mani A.
    Turek, Joseph W.
    Lin, Shu S.
    Davis, R. Duane, Jr.
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2010, 90 (05) : 1622 - U642
  • [7] Postoperative Swallowing Assessment After Lung Transplantation
    Baumann, Brooke
    Byers, Sara
    Wasserman-Wincko, Tamara
    Smith, Libby
    Hathaway, Bridget
    Bhama, Jay
    Shigemura, Norihisa
    Hayanga, J. W. Awori
    D'Cunha, Jonathan
    Johnson, Jonas T.
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2017, 104 (01) : 308 - 312
  • [8] Oropharyngeal dysphagia and laryngeal dysfunction after lung and heart transplantation: A systematic review
    Black, Rebecca
    McCabe, Patricia
    Glanville, Allan
    Bogaardt, Hans
    MacDonald, Peter
    Madill, Catherine
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2020, 42 (15) : 2083 - 2092
  • [9] Clinical predictors for oropharyngeal dysphagia and laryngeal dysfunction after lung and heart transplantation
    Black, Rebecca J.
    Bogaardt, Hans
    McCabe, Patricia
    Glanville, Allan R.
    MacDonald, Peter
    Madill, Catherine
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS, 2019, 54 (06) : 894 - 901
  • [10] Gastro-oesophageal reflux and gastric aspiration in lung transplant patients with or without chronic rejection
    Blondeau, K.
    Merters, V.
    Vanaudenaerde, B. A.
    Verleder, G. M.
    Van Raemdonck, D. E.
    Sifrim, D.
    Dupont, L. J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2008, 31 (04) : 707 - 713