Assessment of barriers to the adoption of innovative building materials (IBM) for sustainable construction in the Nigerian construction industry

被引:0
|
作者
Mogaji, Iseoluwa Joanna [1 ]
Mewomo, Modupe Cecilia [2 ]
Bondinuba, Francis Kwesi [3 ]
机构
[1] Durban Univ Technol, Dept Construction Management & Quant Surveying, Steve Biko Campus, Durban, South Africa
[2] Durban Univ Technol, Dept Construction Management & Technol, Steve Biko Campus, Durban, South Africa
[3] Kumasi Tech Univ, Dept Bldg Technol, Kumasi, Ghana
关键词
Adoption; Barriers; Innovative building materials; Nigerian construction industry; Sustainable construction; MANAGEMENT; TECHNOLOGIES; AWARENESS; DRIVERS;
D O I
10.1108/ECAM-04-2024-0430
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
PurposeWhile innovative building materials (IBM) have emerged as a promising solution for addressing the global construction industry's environmental, economic and social challenges, their adoption is plagued with increasing challenges in the Nigerian construction industry (NCI). To provide practical strategies to overcome the present IBM challenges in the NCI, the barriers that hinder its successful adoption need detailed investigation. Consequently, this study examines the barriers that affect the adoption of IBM for sustainable construction (SC) in the NCI.Design/methodology/approachA quantitative research approach was used to obtain primary data from 282 construction professionals, viz. architects, builders, engineers and quantity surveyors, via a closed-ended questionnaire survey. Data were analysed using a mean item score (descriptive analysis) and exploratory factor analysis (inferential analysis).FindingsThe study revealed the top five most significant barriers to IBM adoption in the NCI. These barriers include lack of awareness and knowledge, learning/training period, cost and economic viability, lack of qualified staff and lack of end-user involvement. Factor analysis revealed five components of barriers: resource and policy-related barriers, perception and cultural-related barriers, organisational-related barriers, awareness and market-related barriers and resistance and stakeholder engagement-related barriers.Practical implicationsThe findings of this study have several practical implications for construction professionals, policymakers and other stakeholders in Nigeria. The study highlights the need for increased awareness and technical expertise to promote the adoption of IBM in the NCI. The study also recommends several practical strategies for overcoming the barriers to IBM adoption and promoting SC practices in Nigeria, such as fostering a positive perception of sustainable concepts, fostering stakeholder support and involvement and promoting a more conducive environment for adopting sustainable practices. The implication of this study transcends the local context, offering a model for other countries to consider, thereby contributing to a global shift towards sustainable construction practices.Social implicationsThe findings highlight the critical role of societal attitudes and awareness in adopting IBM, suggesting the need for educational and awareness programmes to shift public and organisational perception. This shows the importance of cultural change and societal readiness to embrace sustainable construction practices.Originality/valueThis study contributes significantly to knowledge of the barriers to adopting IBM for SC in NCI. Findings from the study will inform policymakers, industry professionals and other stakeholders about the key barriers that require attention and intervention, facilitating the initiatives to overcome these barriers effectively.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 26
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Drivers for the adoption of building information modelling (BIM) for post-construction management in the Nigerian AECO industry
    Bello, Abdulkabir Opeyemi
    Ayegba, Calistus
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT OF PROPERTY AND CONSTRUCTION, 2025, 30 (01) : 137 - 153
  • [42] Strategies for Promoting Green Building Technologies Adoption in the Construction Industry-An International Study
    Chan, Albert Ping Chuen
    Darko, Amos
    Ameyaw, Ernest Effah
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (06)
  • [43] Green Construction Supply Chain Barriers Assessment: Evidence from Indian Construction Industry
    Balon, Virendra
    Bagul, Avinash
    Kumar, Rupesh
    GLOBAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2024,
  • [44] Critical drivers (CDs) of value management adoption in the Nigerian construction industry A Delphi study
    Ojo, Lekan Damilola
    Ogunsemi, Deji Rufus
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 17 (01) : 250 - 264
  • [45] Carbon trading practices adoption for sustainable construction: A study of the barriers in a developing country
    Oke, Ayodeji Emmanuel
    Oyediran, Abiola Oluwasogo
    Koriko, Gbemisola
    Tang, Liyaning Maggie
    SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 32 (01) : 1120 - 1136
  • [46] Recycling of Building Materials as a Principle of Sustainable Construction
    Husetic, Aida
    Japic, Emina
    Omeradzic, Dzenan
    NEW TECHNOLOGIES, DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION V, 2022, 472 : 930 - 936
  • [47] A Scientometric Review and Analysis of Studies on the Barriers and Challenges of Sustainable Construction
    Vaghefi-Rezaee, Hoda Alsadat
    Sarvari, Hadi
    Khademi-Adel, Setareh
    Edwards, David J.
    Roberts, Chris J.
    BUILDINGS, 2024, 14 (11)
  • [48] Identifying barriers to the implementation and development of sustainable construction
    Ahmed, Adel M.
    Sayed, W.
    Asran, A.
    Nosier, I
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2023, 23 (08) : 1277 - 1288
  • [49] BIM Adoption in the Cambodian Construction Industry: Key Drivers and Barriers
    Durdyev, Serdar
    Mbachu, Jasper
    Thurnell, Derek
    Zhao, Linlin
    Hosseini, M. Reza
    ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION, 2021, 10 (04)
  • [50] Exploring the barriers to the adoption of environmental economic practices in the construction industry
    Aliu, John
    Oke, Ayodeji Emmanuel
    Odia, Onoriode Austin
    Akanni, Prince O.
    Leo-Olagbaye, Feyisetan
    Aigbavboa, Clinton
    MANAGEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2025, 36 (01) : 1 - 20