A novel utilite<acute accent>s additives-based social network group decision-making method considering preference consistency

被引:0
作者
Xu, Zhiwei [1 ]
Li, Peng [2 ]
Wei, Cuiping [3 ]
Liu, Jian [4 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Coll Econ & Management, Nanjing 211106, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangsu Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Econ & Management, Zhenjiang 212003, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Yangzhou Univ, Coll Math Sci, Yangzhou 225002, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[4] Missouri Univ Sci & Technol, Kummer Inst, Ctr Artificial Intelligence & Autonomous Syst, Rolla, MO 65409 USA
关键词
Social network group decision-making; Utilites Additives; Consensus reaching process; Pairwise comparison; Fuzzy preference relations; LINGUISTIC TERM SETS; UTILITY-FUNCTIONS; SELF-CONFIDENCE; CONSENSUS MODEL; LEADERSHIP;
D O I
10.1016/j.cie.2025.110947
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Nowadays, social networks and mobile internet have become prominent features of daily life, leading to increasingly interconnected relationships among decision-makers (DMs). The social network group decision- making (SNGDM) method uses social network analysis technology to consider the impact of social trust relationships among DMs on decision results during the decision-making process. The Utilite<acute accent>s Additives (UTA) method can infer the DMs' preference structure based on the partial preference information. This method effectively resolves the consensus problem in SNGDM by utilizing the DMs' preference structure. This paper proposes a novel SNGDM method based on the UTA method that considers the consistency of preference information provided by DMs in the form of pairwise comparisons. Firstly, since the trust relationship between DMs is asymmetric and DM's opinions are usually different, a new preference conflict degree between DMs in SNGDM is defined. Then, to consider the opinion differences and social trust relationship between DMs in the clustering process, a clustering method based on the preference conflict degree is proposed. Furthermore, to obtain the maximal subsets of consistent pairwise comparisons for each DM, we designed a simulation algorithm involving an optimization model to examine the pairwise comparisons provided by the DMs and to obtain the maximal subsets of consistent pairwise comparisons. Moreover, since using only preference information in the form of pairwise comparisons in the consensus reaching process (CRP) leads to a limited space for changes in DMs' opinions, a method for converting the opinions of DMs based on maximal subsets of consistent pairwise comparisons is proposed. This method transforms pairwise comparisons provided by DMs into fuzzy preference relations (FPRs). In addition, in the CRP, a method for adjusting the FPRs of DMs is proposed. Finally, a case study is conducted using real data on new energy vehicles from Autohome to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
引用
收藏
页数:31
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   Decision making for material selection using the UTA method [J].
Athawale, Vijay Manikrao ;
Kumar, Rajanikar ;
Chakraborty, Shankar .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 57 (1-4) :11-22
[2]   Determining the utility functions of criteria used in the evaluation of real estate [J].
Autran Monteiro Gomes, Luiz Flavio ;
Duncan Rangel, Luis Alberto .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2009, 117 (02) :420-426
[3]  
Bezdek J. C., 1978, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, V1, P255, DOI 10.1016/0165-0114(78)90017-9
[4]  
Bondy J. A., 1976, Graph theory with applications
[5]   An efficient consensus reaching framework for large-scale social network group decision making and its application in urban resettlement [J].
Chao, Xiangrui ;
Kou, Gang ;
Peng, Yi ;
Herrera-Viedma, Enrique ;
Herrera, Francisco .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2021, 575 :499-527
[6]   Social network community analysis based large-scale group decision making approach with incomplete fuzzy preference relations [J].
Chu, Junfeng ;
Wang, Yingming ;
Liu, Xinwang ;
Liu, Yicong .
INFORMATION FUSION, 2020, 60 :98-120
[7]   REACHING A CONSENSUS [J].
DEGROOT, MH .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1974, 69 (345) :118-121
[8]   Consensus reaching in social network group decision making: Research paradigms and challenges [J].
Dong, Yucheng ;
Zha, Quanbo ;
Zhang, Hengjie ;
Kou, Gang ;
Fujita, Hamido ;
Chiclana, Francisco ;
Herrera-Viedma, Enrique .
KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2018, 162 :3-13
[9]   Managing consensus based on leadership in opinion dynamics [J].
Dong, Yucheng ;
Ding, Zhaogang ;
Martinez, Luis ;
Herrera, Francisco .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2017, 397 :187-205
[10]   Graph fission in an evolving voter model [J].
Durrett, Richard ;
Gleeson, James P. ;
Lloyd, Alun L. ;
Mucha, Peter J. ;
Shi, Feng ;
Sivakoff, David ;
Socolar, Joshua E. S. ;
Varghese, Chris .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2012, 109 (10) :3682-3687