Impact of retrieval prompts with posterior L1 glossing on novel words learning and processing during L2 reading: An eye-tracking study

被引:0
作者
Wang, Yu [1 ]
Gao, Xiang [2 ]
Gui, Min [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Sch Foreign Languages & Literature, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Qibao High Sch, Pujiang Branch, Shanghai 201101, Peoples R China
[3] Res Inst Foreign Languages, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
关键词
L1; glossing; Retrieval; Vocabulary learning during reading; L2; reading; Eye-tracking; INCIDENTAL VOCABULARY ACQUISITION; LANGUAGE; CONTEXT; OPPORTUNITIES; COMPREHENSION; HYPOTHESIS; ERROR;
D O I
10.1016/j.system.2025.103596
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
To enhance the effects of glossing and retrieval interventions on vocabulary learning during L2 reading, this study investigated how retrieval prompts combined with the use of glossing after a retrieval prompt influenced the learning and processing of unknown words. Using eye-tracking, 51 L2 English learners read a 4693-word story containing 12 target words occurring four times in one of three intervention conditions: (a) full glossing (GGGG) (i.e., target words with L1 gloss on every occurrence); (b) retrieval (GRRR) (i.e., initial glossing followed by three retrieval prompts); and (c) retrieval plus posterior glossing (GRRG) (i.e., initial glossing followed by two retrievals and a feedback glossing). Results showed that (i) GRRR resulted in longer processing time of the target words than GGGG but only enhanced learning of word form; (ii) GRRG resulted in larger learning outcomes in meaning recognition and meaning recall than GRRR and outperformed GGGG in meaning recall and form recognition; and (iii) summed total reading time consistently predicted form recognition, but longer processing times were more likely to result in correct meaning recall in the GGGG condition than in GRRR. The overall positive effect of the GRRG condition suggests that the feedback glossing could reinforce the function of retrieval.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 73 条
  • [1] Retrieval Practice Consistently Benefits Student Learning: a Systematic Review of Applied Research in Schools and Classrooms
    Agarwal, Pooja K.
    Nunes, Ludmila D.
    Blunt, Janell R.
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2021, 33 (04) : 1409 - 1453
  • [2] Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items
    Baayen, R. H.
    Davidson, D. J.
    Bates, D. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2008, 59 (04) : 390 - 412
  • [3] Effects of opportunities for word retrieval during second language vocabulary learning
    Barcroft, Joe
    [J]. LANGUAGE LEARNING, 2007, 57 (01) : 35 - 56
  • [4] Can Retrieval Opportunities Increase Vocabulary Learning During Reading?
    Barcroft, Joe
    [J]. FOREIGN LANGUAGE ANNALS, 2015, 48 (02) : 236 - 249
  • [5] Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal
    Barr, Dale J.
    Levy, Roger
    Scheepers, Christoph
    Tily, Harry J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2013, 68 (03) : 255 - 278
  • [6] Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
    Bates, Douglas
    Maechler, Martin
    Bolker, Benjamin M.
    Walker, Steven C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2015, 67 (01): : 1 - 48
  • [7] Ben-Shachar MS., 2020, Journal of Open Source Software, V5, P2815, DOI [10.21105/joss.02815, DOI 10.21105/JOSS.02815]
  • [8] Glossing and vocabulary learning
    Boers, Frank
    [J]. LANGUAGE TEACHING, 2022, 55 (01) : 1 - 23
  • [9] Cheng YH, 2009, READ FOREIGN LANG, V21, P119
  • [10] Cobb T., 2015, Range for texts v.5.4 Computer software