Using Artificial Intelligence to Support Informed Decision-Making on BRAF Mutation Testing

被引:0
|
作者
Webster, Jennifer [1 ]
Ghith, Jennifer [1 ]
Penner, Orion [2 ]
Lieu, Christopher H. [3 ]
Schijvenaars, Bob J. A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Pfizer Inc, New York, NY USA
[2] Digital Sci, London, England
[3] Univ Colorado, Med, Aurora, CO USA
关键词
CELL LUNG-CANCER; PRECISION MEDICINE; OPEN-LABEL; MELANOMA; MULTICENTER; DABRAFENIB; ONCOLOGY; GUIDELINES; V600E; GENE;
D O I
10.1200/PO.23.00685
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PURPOSE Precision oncology relies on accurate and interpretable reporting of testing and mutation rates. Focusing on the BRAFV600 mutations in advanced colorectal carcinoma, non-small-cell lung carcinoma, and cutaneous melanoma, we developed a platform displaying testing and mutation rates reported in the literature, which we annotated using an artificial intelligence (AI) and natural language processing (NLP) pipeline. METHODS Using AI, we identified publications that likely reported a testing or mutation rate, filtered publications for cancer type, and identified sentences that likely reported rates. Rates and covariates were subsequently manually curated by three experts. The AI performance was evaluated using precision and recall metrics. We used an interactive platform to explore and present the annotated testing and mutation rates by certain study characteristics. RESULTS The interactive dashboard, accessible at the BRAF dimensions website, enables users to filter mutation and testing rates with relevant options (eg, country of study, study type, mutation type) and to visualize annotated rates. The AI pipeline demonstrated excellent filtering performance (>90% precision and recall for all target cancer types) and moderate performance for sentence classification (53%-99% precision; >= 75% recall). The manual annotation of testing and mutation rates revealed inter-rater disagreement (testing rate, 19%; mutation rate, 70%), indicating unclear or nonstandard reporting of rates in some publications. CONCLUSION Our AI-driven NLP pipeline demonstrated the potential for annotating biomarker testing and mutation rates. The difficulties we encountered highlight the need for more advanced AI-powered literature searching and data extraction, and more consistent reporting of testing rates. These improvements would reduce the risk of misinterpretation or misunderstanding of testing and mutation rates by AI-based technologies and the health care community, with beneficial impacts on clinical decision-making, research, and trial design.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Artificial INtelligence to Support Informed DEcision-making (INSIDE) for Improved Literature Analysis in Oncology
    Stenzl, Arnulf
    Armstrong, Andrew J.
    Sboner, Andrea
    Ghith, Jenny
    Serfass, Lucile
    Bland, Christopher S.
    Schijvenaars, Bob J. A.
    Sternberg, Cora N.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2024, 10 (06): : 1011 - 1018
  • [2] Artificial intelligence to support clinical decision-making processes
    Garcia-Vidal, Carolina
    Sanjuan, Gemma
    Puerta-Alcalde, Pedro
    Moreno-Garcia, Estela
    Soriano, Alex
    EBIOMEDICINE, 2019, 46 : 27 - 29
  • [3] Artificial Intelligence and Decision-Making
    Dear, Keith
    RUSI JOURNAL, 2019, 164 (5-6): : 18 - 25
  • [4] Support or automation in decision-making: the role of artificial intelligence for the project
    Ferrante, Tiziana
    Romagnoli, Federica
    TECHNE-JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY FOR ARCHITECTURE AND ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 25 : 68 - 77
  • [5] Decision-making in tunneling using artificial intelligence tools
    Mahmoodzadeh, Arsalan
    Mohammadi, Mokhtar
    Daraei, Ako
    Faraj, Rabar H.
    Omer, Rebaz Mohammed Dler
    Sherwani, Aryan Far H.
    TUNNELLING AND UNDERGROUND SPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 103
  • [6] Artificial Intelligence and Surgical Decision-making
    Loftus, Tyler J.
    Tighe, Patrick J.
    Filiberto, Amanda C.
    Efron, Philip A.
    Brakenridge, Scott C.
    Mohr, Alicia M.
    Rashidi, Parisa
    Upchurch, Gilbert R., Jr.
    Bihorac, Azra
    JAMA SURGERY, 2020, 155 (02) : 148 - 158
  • [7] Optimization, Decision-making and Artificial Intelligence
    Mittal, Mandeep
    Shah, Nita H.
    Recent Advances in Computer Science and Communications, 2022, 15 (01):
  • [8] THEOLOGY OF DECISION-MAKING AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
    Yegoryevskiy, Mefodiy
    VESTNIK PRAVOSLAVNOGO SVYATO-TIKHONOVSKOGO GUMANITARNOGO UNIVERSITETA-SERIYA I-BOGOSLOVIE-FILOSOFIYA-RELIGIOVEDENIE, 2024, (116): : 44 - 56
  • [9] Intelligence in Governance for Support in Decision-Making
    Monteiro de Andrade, Luiz Odorico
    CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA, 2012, 17 (04): : 829 - U16
  • [10] Fostering Informed Consent and Shared Decision-Making in Maternity Nursing With the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence
    Penner, Sara Bickweat
    Mercado, Nicholas R.
    Bernstein, Samantha
    Erickson, Elise
    Dubois, Melissa Anne
    Dreisbach, Caitlin
    MCN-THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-CHILD NURSING, 2025, 50 (02) : 78 - 85