Governmental venture capital and investor sentiment: Evidence from Chinese government guidance funds

被引:0
作者
Huang, Xinfei [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Yue [1 ,2 ]
Zong, Zhe [3 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Int Sch Business & Finance, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat sen Univ, Adv Inst Finance, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] China Zheshang Bank, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Venture capital; Government guidance funds; IPO initial return; Market overvaluation; Investor sentiment; Signaling theory; INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERINGS; LIFE-CYCLE PERSPECTIVE; LONG-RUN PERFORMANCE; PARTIAL ADJUSTMENT; VALUE CREATION; IPO ACTIVITY; HIGH-TECH; FIRMS; INVESTMENTS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.intfin.2025.102120
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
While the role of government-backed venture capital (GVC) in influencing companies' operating performance has been well-documented, its potential impact on the financial market remains less explored. This paper aims to fill this gap in the context of China's venture capital market. Since 2002, the Chinese government has launched a type of policy VC fund-government guidance funds (GGFs)-to stimulate innovation, industrial transformation, and local economic growth. Using a sample of 2,860 IPO companies from 2010 to 2021, we show that GGF-backed IPOs exhibited higher initial returns than both non-VC-backed and non-GGF VC-backed IPOs. A decomposition of the initial returns reveals that this effect was driven by market overvaluation rather than IPO price discounts. Consistent with investor sentiment and signaling theory, our results suggest that investors held optimistic views towards GGF-backed companies. However, when assessing post-IPO operating and innovation performance, GGF-backed companies did not outperform their counterparts. Overall, this paper highlights the signaling effects of GGFs in the financial market and provides important policy implications for the design of GVC programs worldwide.
引用
收藏
页数:34
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]  
Allen F., 2022, The Evolution of StateOwnership in China, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.4283197, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.4283197]
[2]   Bridging the equity gap for young innovative companies: The design of effective government venture capital fund programs [J].
Alperovych, Yan ;
Groh, Alexander ;
Quas, Anita .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2020, 49 (10)
[3]  
Alperovych Y, 2018, ECON BULL, V38, P1219
[4]   How does governmental versus private venture capital backing affect a firm's efficiency? Evidence from Belgium [J].
Alperovych, Yan ;
Huebner, Georges ;
Lobet, Fabrice .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 2015, 30 (04) :508-525
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Zero2IPO Report (Part 1), 12
[6]   Creating venture capital industries that co-evolve with high tech: Insights from an extended industry life cycle perspective of the Israeli experience [J].
Avnimelech, Gil ;
Teubal, Morris .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2006, 35 (10) :1477-1498
[7]  
Bai J., 2021, The Dance between Government and Private Investors: Public Entrepreneurial Finance around the Globe, No. w28744
[8]   Media sentiment and IPO underpricing [J].
Bajo, Emanuele ;
Raimondo, Carlo .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2017, 46 :139-153
[9]   Cross-country IPOs: What explains differences in underpricing? [J].
Banerjee, Suman ;
Dai, Lili ;
Shrestha, Keshab .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2011, 17 (05) :1289-1305
[10]   The Regulatory Role of Credit Ratings and Voluntary Disclosure [J].
Basu, Riddha ;
Naughton, James P. ;
Wang, Clare .
ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2022, 97 (02) :25-50