Risk Classification of Food Incidents Using a Risk Evaluation Matrix for Use in Artificial Intelligence-Supported Risk Identification

被引:0
|
作者
Roehrs, Sina [1 ]
Rohn, Sascha [2 ]
Pfeifer, Yvonne [1 ]
机构
[1] SGS Germany GmbH Hlth & Nutr, Heidenkampsweg 99, D-20097 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Berlin, Inst Food Technol & Food Chem, Dept Food Chem & Anal, Gustav Meyer Allee 25, D-13355 Berlin, Germany
关键词
risk assessment; artificial intelligence; food safety; early warning; SALMONELLA; INFECTION; EXPOSURE; CADMIUM; THREAT;
D O I
10.3390/foods13223675
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Foodborne illnesses and mortalities persist as a significant global health issue. The World Health Organization estimates that one out of every ten individuals becomes ill following the consumption of contaminated food. However, in the age of digitalization and technological progress, more and more data and data evaluation technologies are available to counteract this problem. A specific challenge in this context is the efficient and beneficial utilization of the continuously increasing volume of data. In pursuit of optimal data utilization, the objective of the present study was to develop a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA)-based assessment scheme to be prospectively implemented into an overall artificial intelligence (AI)-supported database for the autonomous risk categorization of food incident reports. Such additional evaluations might help to identify certain novel or emerging risks by allocating a level of risk prioritization. Ideally, such indications are obtained earlier than an official notification, and therefore, this method can be considered preventive, as the risk is already identified. Our results showed that this approach enables the efficient and time-saving preliminary risk categorization of incident reports, allowing for the rapid identification of relevant reports related to predefined subject areas or inquiries that require further examination. The manual test runs demonstrated practicality, enabling the implementation of the evaluation scheme in AI-supported databases for the autonomous assessment of incident reports. Moreover, it has become evident that increasing the amount of information and evaluation criteria provided to AI notably enhances the precision of risk assessments for individual incident notifications. This will remain an ongoing challenge for the utilization and processing of food safety data in the future.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Risk Prediction Model for Chronic Kidney Disease in Thailand Using Artificial Intelligence and SHAP
    Tsai, Ming-Che
    Lojanapiwat, Bannakij
    Chang, Chi-Chang
    Noppakun, Kajohnsak
    Khumrin, Piyapong
    Li, Ssu-Hui
    Lee, Chih-Ying
    Lee, Hsi-Chieh
    Khwanngern, Krit
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (23)
  • [42] Pipeline risk assessment using artificial intelligence: A case from the colombian oil network
    Urbina, Alexander Guzman
    Aoyama, Atsushi
    PROCESS SAFETY PROGRESS, 2018, 37 (01) : 110 - 116
  • [43] Opportunities and Challenges in Fall Risk Management using EHRs and Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review
    dos Santos, Henrique D. P.
    Damasio, Juliana O.
    Ulbrich, Ana Helena D. P. S.
    Vieira, Renata
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 23RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SYSTEMS (ICEIS 2021), VOL 1, 2021, : 626 - 633
  • [44] Extracapsular extension risk assessment using an artificial intelligence prostate cancer mapping algorithm
    Priester, Alan
    Mota, Sakina Mohammed
    Grunden, Kyla P.
    Shubert, Joshua
    Richardson, Shannon
    Sisk, Anthony
    Felker, Ely R.
    Sayre, James
    Marks, Leonard S.
    Natarajan, Shyam
    Brisbane, Wayne G.
    BJUI COMPASS, 2024, 5 (10): : 986 - 997
  • [45] The ReIMAGINE Multimodal Warehouse: Using Artificial Intelligence for Accurate Risk Stratification of Prostate Cancer
    Santaolalla, Aida
    Hulsen, Tim
    Davis, Jenson
    Ahmed, Hashim U.
    Moore, Caroline M.
    Punwani, Shonit
    Attard, Gert
    McCartan, Neil
    Emberton, Mark
    Coolen, Anthony
    Van Hemelrijck, Mieke
    FRONTIERS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2021, 4
  • [46] BRCA Variations Risk Assessment in Breast Cancers Using Different Artificial Intelligence Models
    Senturk, Niyazi
    Tuncel, Gulten
    Dogan, Berkcan
    Aliyeva, Lamiya
    Dundar, Mehmet Sait
    Ozemri Sag, Sebnem
    Mocan, Gamze
    Temel, Sehime Gulsun
    Dundar, Munis
    Ergoren, Mahmut Cerkez
    GENES, 2021, 12 (11)
  • [47] Estimating risk levels for blood pressure and thyroid hormone using artificial intelligence methods
    Al-Kaltakchi, Musab T.S.
    Omar Al-Nima, Raid Rafi
    Alhialy, Azza
    International Journal of Electronics and Telecommunications, 2024, 70 (03) : 667 - 672
  • [48] Uncovering risk professionals' intentions to use artificial intelligence: empirical evidence from the Italian setting
    Ferri, Luca
    Maffei, Marco
    Spano, Rosanna
    Zagaria, Claudia
    MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2023,
  • [49] Use of Hearing Aids Embedded with Inertial Sensors and Artificial Intelligence to Identify Patients at Risk for Falling
    Steenerson, Kristen K.
    Griswold, Bryn
    Keating III, Donald P.
    Srour, Majd
    Burwinkel, Justin R.
    Isanhart, Erin
    Ma, Yifei
    Fabry, David A.
    Bhowmik, Achintya K.
    Jackler, Robert K.
    Fitzgerald, Matthew B.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2025, 46 (02) : 121 - 127
  • [50] The use of artificial intelligence and virtual reality in doctor-patient risk communication: A scoping review
    Antel, Ryan
    Abbasgholizadeh-Rahimi, Samira
    Guadagno, Elena
    Harley, Jason M.
    Poenaru, Dan
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2022, 105 (10) : 3038 - 3050