Towards a Quantitative Evaluation Framework for Trustworthy AI in Facial Analysis

被引:0
作者
Schreiner, Annika [1 ]
Kemmerzell, Nils [1 ]
机构
[1] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Erlangen, Germany
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 57TH ANNUAL HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES | 2024年
关键词
Trustworthy AI; Evaluation; Facial Analysis; PRIVACY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
As machine learning (ML) models are increasingly being used in real-life applications, ensuring their trustworthiness has become a rising concern. Previous research has extensively examined individual perspectives on trustworthiness, such as fairness, robustness, privacy, and explainability. Investigating their interrelations could be the next step in achieving an improved understanding of the trustworthiness of ML models. By conducting experiments within the context of facial analysis, we explore the feasibility of quantifying multiple aspects of trustworthiness within a unified evaluation framework. Our results indicate the viability of such a framework, achieved through the aggregation of diverse metrics into holistic scores. This framework can serve as a practical tool to assess ML models in terms of multiple aspects of trustworthiness, specifically enabling the quantification of their interactions and the impact of training data. Finally, we discuss potential solutions to key technical challenges in developing the framework and the opportunities of its transfer to other use cases.
引用
收藏
页码:7821 / 7830
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) [J].
Adadi, Amina ;
Berrada, Mohammed .
IEEE ACCESS, 2018, 6 :52138-52160
[2]   Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning: Threats and Solutions [J].
Al-Rubaie, Mohammad ;
Chang, J. Morris .
IEEE SECURITY & PRIVACY, 2019, 17 (02) :49-58
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, WORKSHOP INT C LEARN, DOI DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.1312.6034
[4]  
Arpit D, 2017, PR MACH LEARN RES, V70
[5]  
Balagopalan A., 2022, The road to explainability is paved with bias: measuring the fairness of explanations, DOI DOI 10.1145/3531146.3533179
[6]  
Bansal Rajas, 2022, ARXIV
[7]   Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Art [J].
Berk, Richard ;
Heidari, Hoda ;
Jabbari, Shahin ;
Kearns, Michael ;
Roth, Aaron .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 2021, 50 (01) :3-44
[8]  
Bhatt U., 2020, ARXIV
[9]  
Bird Sarah, 2020, Technical Report MSR-TR-2020-32
[10]  
Brendel W., 2019, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, V32