Process Evaluation of Teaching Critical Thinking About Health Using the Informed Health Choices Intervention in Uganda: A Mixed Methods Study

被引:0
|
作者
Ssenyonga, Ronald [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lewin, Simon [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Nakyejwe, Esther [1 ]
Chelagat, Faith [1 ,7 ]
Mugisha, Michael [8 ]
Oxman, Matt [4 ,9 ]
Nsangi, Allen [1 ]
Semakula, Daniel [1 ]
Rosenbaum, Sarah E. [4 ]
Moberg, Jenny [4 ]
Oxman, Andrew D. [4 ]
Munthe-Kaas, Heather [4 ]
Holst, Christine [4 ]
Kaseje, Margaret [7 ]
Nyirazinyoye, Laetitia [8 ]
Sewankambo, Nelson [1 ]
机构
[1] Makerere Univ, Coll Hlth Sci, Dept Med, Kampala, Uganda
[2] Makerere Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Kampala, Uganda
[3] Univ Oslo, Inst Hlth & Soc, Fac Med, Oslo, Norway
[4] Norwegian Inst Publ Hlth, Ctr Epidem Intervent Res, Oslo, Norway
[5] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Hlth Sci, Alesund, Norway
[6] South African Med Res Council, Hlth Syst Res Unit, Cape Town, South Africa
[7] Trop Inst Community Hlth & Dev Africa, Kisumu, Kenya
[8] Univ Rwanda, Coll Med & Hlth Sci, Sch Publ Hlth, Kigali, Rwanda
[9] Oslo Metropolitan Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Oslo, Norway
来源
GLOBAL HEALTH-SCIENCE AND PRACTICE | 2024年 / 12卷 / 06期
关键词
D O I
10.9745/GHSP-D-23-00484
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction: We designed the Informed Health Choices (IHC) secondary school intervention and evaluated whether it improves students' ability to assess the trustworthiness of claims about treatment effects in Uganda. We conducted a process evaluation alongside a randomized trial to identify factors that may affect the implementation, fidelity, and scaling up of the intervention in Uganda. We also explored the potential adverse and beneficial effects of the intervention. Methods: We used mixed methods to collect, triangulate, and report data from a variety of sources. We observed at least 1 lesson all 40 intervention schools. One teacher from each of these schools completed a teacher training evaluation form and lesson evaluation questionnaires after each lesson. We purposively selected 10 schools where we conducted a total of 10 focus group discussions with students and 1 with parents. We also conducted key informant interviews with policymakers (N1/49), teachers (N1/410), head teachers (N1/44), and parents (N1/43). We used a framework analysis approach to analyze the data. Findings: All participants in the process evaluation felt that the IHC intervention was needed, important, and timely. Students were motivated to attend class and learn the content because it spoke to their daily life experiences and their own challenges to decide what do or believe when faced with health claims. The training workshop gave teachers the confidence to teach the lessons. The participating students demonstrated a clear understanding of the content and use of what was learned. The content improved both students' and teachers' appreciation of the critical thinking, communication, and problem-solving competencies in the lower secondary school curriculum. Conclusion: The findings of this process evaluation are consistent with the findings of the trial, which showed that the intervention improved the students' critical thinking skills. The IHC resources enabled teachers to teach this competency.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluation of health promotion in schools: a realistic evaluation approach using mixed methods
    Pommier, Jeanine
    Guevel, Marie-Renee
    Jourdan, Didier
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2010, 10
  • [42] Evaluation of health promotion in schools: a realistic evaluation approach using mixed methods
    Jeanine Pommier
    Marie-Renée Guével
    Didier Jourdan
    BMC Public Health, 10
  • [43] A Mixed-Methods Comparison of Classroom Context During Food, Health & Choices, a Childhood Obesity Prevention Intervention
    Burgermaster, Marissa
    Koroly, Jenna
    Contento, Isobel
    Koch, Pamela
    Gray, Heewon L.
    JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH, 2017, 87 (11) : 811 - 822
  • [44] Intervention effects for direct and indirect participants in an organisational health intervention: A mixed-methods study
    Lehmann, A., I
    Bauer, G. F.
    Brauchli, R.
    WORK AND STRESS, 2022, 36 (03): : 312 - 336
  • [45] Implementation of a Health Promotion Practice Using Individually Targeted Lifestyle Interventions in Primary Health Care: Protocol for the "Act in Time" Mixed Methods Process Evaluation Study
    Strid, Emma Nilsing
    Wallin, Lars
    Nilsagard, Ylva
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2022, 11 (08):
  • [46] A mental health intervention program for the oocyte donors: protocol for a mixed methods study
    Elham Adib Moghaddam
    Ashraf Kazemi
    Gholamreza Kheirabadi
    Seyyed Mehdi Ahmadi
    Reproductive Health, 17
  • [47] A mental health intervention program for the oocyte donors: protocol for a mixed methods study
    Adib Moghaddam, Elham
    Kazemi, Ashraf
    Kheirabadi, Gholamreza
    Ahmadi, Seyyed Mehdi
    REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2020, 17 (01)
  • [48] Mindfulness Intervention for Health Information Avoidance in Older Adults: Mixed Methods Study
    Gu, Chenyu
    Qian, Liquan
    Zhuo, Xiaojie
    JMIR PUBLIC HEALTH AND SURVEILLANCE, 2025, 11
  • [49] eHealth Intervention to Improve Health Habits in the Adolescent Population: Mixed Methods Study
    Benavides, Carmen
    Benitez-Andrades, Jose Alberto
    Marques-Sanchez, Pilar
    Arias, Natalia
    JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2021, 9 (02):
  • [50] Promoting Problem Solving About Health Management: A Mixed-Methods Pilot Evaluation of a Digital Health Intervention for Older Adults With Pre-Frailty and Frailty
    Chen, Annie T.
    Chu, Frances
    Teng, Andrew K.
    Han, Soojeong
    Lin, Shih-Yin
    Demiris, George
    Zaslavsky, Oleg
    GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRIC MEDICINE, 2021, 7