Dynamic fine-tuning of anti-predator behaviour in snowshoe hares illustrates the context dependence of risk effects

被引:0
作者
Wirsing, Aaron [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Coll Environm, Sch Environm & Forest Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
foraging; <italic>Lepus americanus</italic>; phenological mismatch; predation-risk effects; state-dependent risk-taking; trade-off; vigilance;
D O I
10.1111/1365-2656.14219
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Research Highlight: Shiratsuru, S., & Pauli, J. N. (2024). Food-safety trade-offs drive dynamic behavioural antipredator responses among snowshoe hares. Journal of Animal Ecology, DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.14183. Predation-risk effects are known to be context dependent, with impacts of perceived predation threat on individual antipredator responses, prey population demography, species interactions and community organization hinging on traits of the prey, the predator(s) and setting of the interaction. Yet, few empirical studies to date have simultaneously explored how these three drivers shape contingency in antipredator behaviour, the key first step in the process by which predation-risk effects play out, especially in free-living vertebrates. In a new study, Shiratsuru & Pauli (2024) address this knowledge deficit by showing that snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus) trade foraging for anti-predator vigilance dynamically as a function of winter food availability (a proxy for individual energetic state), the timing and intensity of predator activity, and environmental properties associated with elevated vulnerability to predator-induced mortality, notably including coat colour mismatch caused by variation in snow cover. These results offer new insight into the complexity of predation-risk effects and should serve as a guide for research aiming to better understand the expression of these effects under varying circumstances.
引用
收藏
页码:4 / 6
页数:3
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [11] Prey state shapes the effects of temporal variation in predation risk
    Matassa, Catherine M.
    Trussell, Geoffrey C.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2014, 281 (1796)
  • [12] Dynamic landscapes of fear: understanding spatiotemporal risk
    Palmer, Meredith S.
    Gaynor, Kaitlyn M.
    Becker, Justine A.
    Abraham, Joel O.
    Mumma, Matthew A.
    Pringle, Robert M.
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2022, 37 (10) : 911 - 925
  • [13] A framework and standardized terminology to facilitate the study of predation-risk effects
    Peacor, Scott D.
    Barton, Brandon T.
    Kimbro, David L.
    Sih, Andrew
    Sheriff, Michael J.
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 2020, 101 (12)
  • [14] Predator hunting mode and habitat domain alter nonconsumptive effects in predator-prey interactions
    Preisser, Evan L.
    Orrock, John L.
    Schmitz, Oswald J.
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 2007, 88 (11) : 2744 - 2751
  • [15] Food-safety trade-offs drive dynamic behavioural antipredator responses among snowshoe hares
    Shiratsuru, Shotaro
    Pauli, Jonathan N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 2024, 93 (11) : 1710 - 1721
  • [16] The context dependence of non-consumptive predator effects
    Wirsing, Aaron J.
    Heithaus, Michael R.
    Brown, Joel S.
    Kotler, Burt P.
    Schmitz, Oswald J.
    [J]. ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2021, 24 (01) : 113 - 129
  • [17] Spatial responses to predators vary with prey escape mode
    Wirsing, Aaron J.
    Cameron, Kathryn E.
    Heithaus, Michael R.
    [J]. ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2010, 79 (03) : 531 - 537