The environmental benefits of grassroots cooperatives in agriculture

被引:0
作者
Cornee, Simon [1 ,2 ]
Rousseliere, Damien [3 ]
Thelen, Veronique [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rennes, Fac Sci Econ, CREM UMR CNRS 6211, 7 Pl Hoche CS,8651435065, Rennes, France
[2] CERMi, Fac Sci Econ, 7 Pl Hoche CS,8651435065, Rennes, France
[3] INRAE, Inst Agro, SMART, Angers, France
[4] Univ Rennes, CREM UMR CNRS 6211, Rennes, France
关键词
Cooperatives; Farm machinery sharing cooperatives; Pesticides; Agriculture; Collective action; Social interactions; SOCIAL NETWORKS; GOVERNANCE; MANAGEMENT; SUSTAINABILITY; RECIPROCITY; PESTICIDES; INNOVATION; ADOPTION; DRIVERS; CLIMATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108513
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
This paper analyses the environmental benefits of grassroots cooperation in agriculture. Specifically, it focuses on the French context, which is characterised by a heavy reliance on pesticides and by strong inter-farmer interactions structured within farm machinery sharing cooperatives (CUMAs). We theorise that these social interactions are strategically complementary in the sense that the agroecological practices of farmers involved in the CUMA network, in a given spatial unit, are influenced by the presence and actions of CUMA members in their vicinity. At the extensive margin, increased peer-to-peer interactions, driven by a higher density of CUMA members, foster sociotechnical exchanges conducive to reducing pesticide use. At the intensive margin, if members individually make greater use of their CUMA, they collectively gain access to technologically advanced machinery assets, which leads to a reduction in pesticide use through improvements in technical efficiency. Our econometric analysis, based on a dataset provided by the National Federation of CUMAs covering 5793 individual cooperatives, fully supports the extensive-margin mechanism. The intensive-margin mechanism, however, is only observed for greater use of agroecological equipment by CUMA members, suggesting a rebound effect when it comes to conventional equipment. Overall, these results point to the idea of a 'hidden agroecological transition.'
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Peat Land Oil Palm Farmers' Direct and Indirect Benefits from Good Agriculture Practices
    Awang, Abd Hair
    Rela, Iskandar Zainuddin
    Abas, Azlan
    Johari, Mohamad Arfan
    Marzuki, Mohammad Effendi
    Mohd Faudzi, Mohd Noor Ramdan
    Musa, Adri
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (14)
  • [42] Combined land use of solar infrastructure and agriculture for socioeconomic and environmental co-benefits in the tropics
    Choi, Chong Seok
    Ravi, Sujith
    Siregar, Iskandar Z.
    Dwiyanti, Fifi Gus
    Macknick, Jordan
    Elchinger, Michael
    Davatzes, Nicholas C.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2021, 151
  • [43] Environmental aspects to consider in the training of cooperatives members
    Arrieta Idiakez, Francisco Javier
    [J]. BOLETIN DE LA ASOCIACION INTERNACIONAL DE DERECHO COOPERATIVO-INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COOPERATIVE LAW JOURNAL, 2020, 57 : 147 - 169
  • [44] Investments in Polish Agriculture: How Production Factors Shape Conditions for Environmental Protection?
    Borawski, Piotr
    Guth, Marta
    Beldycka-Borawska, Aneta
    Jankowski, Krzysztof Jozef
    Parzonko, Andrzej
    Dunn, James W.
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (19)
  • [45] Why do cooperatives assure their CSR reports? An analysis of the motivations and benefits in a big retail cooperative
    Segui-Mas, Elies
    Maria Bollas-Araya, Helena
    Asensi Peiro, Paula
    [J]. CIRIEC-ESPANA REVISTA DE ECONOMIA PUBLICA SOCIAL Y COOPERATIVA, 2016, 87 : 39 - 68
  • [46] "More CSR versus more benefits": how members' motives influence loyalty toward cooperatives
    Lecuyer, Charlotte
    Beal, Mathieu
    Capelli, Sonia
    Sabadie, William
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2022, 56 (08) : 2309 - 2339
  • [47] Farmers' Assessments of Their Cooperatives in Economic, Social, and Environmental Terms: An Investigation in Fujian, China
    Yu, Liyan
    Nilsson, Jerker
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2021, 9
  • [48] Measuring environmental sustainability in agriculture: A composite environmental impact index approach
    Sabiha, Noor-E.
    Salim, Ruhul
    Rahman, Sanzidur
    Rola-Rubzen, Maria Fay
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2016, 166 : 84 - 93
  • [49] Selling Together: The Benefits of Cooperatives to Women Honey Producers in Ethiopia
    Serra, Renata
    Davidson, Kelly A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2021, 72 (01) : 202 - 223
  • [50] Benefits of Organic Agriculture under the Perspective of the Bioeconomy: A Systematic Review
    Cidon, Camila Fritzen
    Figueiro, Paola Schmitt
    Schreiber, Dusan
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (12)