The environmental benefits of grassroots cooperatives in agriculture

被引:0
作者
Cornee, Simon [1 ,2 ]
Rousseliere, Damien [3 ]
Thelen, Veronique [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rennes, Fac Sci Econ, CREM UMR CNRS 6211, 7 Pl Hoche CS,8651435065, Rennes, France
[2] CERMi, Fac Sci Econ, 7 Pl Hoche CS,8651435065, Rennes, France
[3] INRAE, Inst Agro, SMART, Angers, France
[4] Univ Rennes, CREM UMR CNRS 6211, Rennes, France
关键词
Cooperatives; Farm machinery sharing cooperatives; Pesticides; Agriculture; Collective action; Social interactions; SOCIAL NETWORKS; GOVERNANCE; MANAGEMENT; SUSTAINABILITY; RECIPROCITY; PESTICIDES; INNOVATION; ADOPTION; DRIVERS; CLIMATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108513
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
This paper analyses the environmental benefits of grassroots cooperation in agriculture. Specifically, it focuses on the French context, which is characterised by a heavy reliance on pesticides and by strong inter-farmer interactions structured within farm machinery sharing cooperatives (CUMAs). We theorise that these social interactions are strategically complementary in the sense that the agroecological practices of farmers involved in the CUMA network, in a given spatial unit, are influenced by the presence and actions of CUMA members in their vicinity. At the extensive margin, increased peer-to-peer interactions, driven by a higher density of CUMA members, foster sociotechnical exchanges conducive to reducing pesticide use. At the intensive margin, if members individually make greater use of their CUMA, they collectively gain access to technologically advanced machinery assets, which leads to a reduction in pesticide use through improvements in technical efficiency. Our econometric analysis, based on a dataset provided by the National Federation of CUMAs covering 5793 individual cooperatives, fully supports the extensive-margin mechanism. The intensive-margin mechanism, however, is only observed for greater use of agroecological equipment by CUMA members, suggesting a rebound effect when it comes to conventional equipment. Overall, these results point to the idea of a 'hidden agroecological transition.'
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The green side of social innovation: Using sustainable development goals to classify environmental impacts of rural grassroots initiatives
    Govigli, Valentino Marini
    Rois-Diaz, Mercedes
    den Herder, Michael
    Bryce, Rosalind
    Tuomasjukka, Diana
    Gorriz-Mifsud, Elena
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND GOVERNANCE, 2022, 32 (06) : 459 - 477
  • [32] Environmental change, agricultural innovation, and the spread of cotton agriculture in the Old World
    Brite, Elizabeth Baker
    Marston, John M.
    JOURNAL OF ANTHROPOLOGICAL ARCHAEOLOGY, 2013, 32 (01) : 39 - 53
  • [33] Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Silage Maize in Relation to Regenerative Agriculture
    Dedina, Martin
    Jevic, Petr
    Cermak, Pavel
    Moudry, Jan
    Mukosha, Chisenga Emmanuel
    Losak, Tomas
    Hrusovsky, Tadeas
    Watzlova, Elizaveta
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (02)
  • [35] CEO and Chairperson Characteristics and Corporate Environmental Performance: A Study of Cooperatives in Vietnam
    Nhat Minh Tran
    SAGE OPEN, 2022, 12 (04):
  • [36] Plant-microbe community dynamics in rhizosphere: Reviewing the grassroots ecology towards sustainable agriculture
    Khan, Dibyendu
    Kabiraj, Ashutosh
    Biswas, Raju
    Roy, Rajendra Kr
    Bandopadhyay, Rajib
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2023, 93 (03): : 247 - 257
  • [37] Social and solidarity economy and agroecology in family agriculture cooperatives in Brazil as a form of development of sustainable agriculture
    Schwab do Nascimento, Fabio
    Calle-Collado, Angel
    Munoz Benito, Rocio
    CIRIEC-ESPANA REVISTA DE ECONOMIA PUBLICA SOCIAL Y COOPERATIVA, 2020, 98 : 189 - 211
  • [38] Digitalization of Agri-Cooperatives in the Smart Agriculture Context. Proposal of a Digital Diagnosis Tool
    Manuel Ciruela-Lorenzo, Antonio
    Rosa Del Aguila-Obra, Ana
    Padilla-Melendez, Antonio
    Jose Plaza-Angulo, Juan
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (04)
  • [39] SOME ASPECTS OF THE USE OF ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL POTENTIAL OF THE COOPERATIVES IN AGRICULTURE
    Novotny, Jiri
    AKTUALNE POHL'ADY NA KONKURENCIESCHOPNOST' A PODNIKANIE - NOVE VYZVY, 2011, : 367 - 375
  • [40] Prospects and benefits of biotechnology in agriculture
    Sayyed, Ali H.
    JOURNAL OF FOOD AGRICULTURE & ENVIRONMENT, 2003, 1 (3-4): : 200 - 202