Modeling of winter wheat yield prediction based on solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence by machine learning methods

被引:0
作者
Zheng, Minxue [1 ,2 ]
Hu, Han [1 ,2 ]
Niu, Yue [3 ]
Shen, Qiu [1 ,2 ]
Jia, Feng [1 ,2 ]
Geng, Xiaolei [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Jiangsu Univ, Sch Environm & Safety Engn, 301 Xuefu Rd, Zhenjiang 212013, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangsu Univ, Sch Emergency Management, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Jiangsu Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Comp, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Yield prediction; machine learning; solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence; winter wheat; vegetation indices; LEAF-AREA INDEX; VEGETATION INDEX; WATER; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; INCREASE; PRODUCT; CORN;
D O I
10.1080/22797254.2025.2455940
中图分类号
TP7 [遥感技术];
学科分类号
081102 ; 0816 ; 081602 ; 083002 ; 1404 ;
摘要
Timely and accurate prediction of large-scale crop yields is critical for national food security. Solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF), an indicator of photosynthesis, has emerged as a promising predictor of crop yields. However, it remains unclear to what extent satellite-based SIF data can predict crop yields at the regional scale compared to the newly proposed Near-Infrared Reflectance of Vegetation (NIRv). Using multiple statistical machine learning (ML) methods, this study investigated the predictive abilities of SIF and NIRv by combining climate data to predict winter wheat yields in five provinces in the North China Plain (NCP). Results showed that: (a) SIF outperformed NIRv in predicting winter wheat yields. However, in the Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) model, SIF's predictive performance was better than that of the combination of SIF and NIRv, indicating that combining SIF and NIRv could not completely enhance SIF's predictive performance. (b) Random Forest (RF) and XGB models were significantly better than the other models in yield prediction; specifically, the RF model had high stability. The results highlighted the benefits of combining multiple sources of data and revealed the advantages of RF and XGB models in crop yield prediction in the major grain production region.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 96 条
[1]  
Aashu, 2024, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:2405.17465
[2]   Data Descriptor: TerraClimate, a high-resolution global dataset of monthly climate and climatic water balance from 1958-2015 [J].
Abatzoglou, John T. ;
Dobrowski, Solomon Z. ;
Parks, Sean A. ;
Hegewisch, Katherine C. .
SCIENTIFIC DATA, 2018, 5
[3]  
Asseng S, 2015, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V5, P143, DOI [10.1038/nclimate2470, 10.1038/NCLIMATE2470]
[4]   Terrestrial gross primary production: Using NIRV to scale from site to globe [J].
Badgley, Grayson ;
Anderegg, Leander D. L. ;
Berry, Joseph A. ;
Field, Christopher B. .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2019, 25 (11) :3731-3740
[5]   Canopy near-infrared reflectance and terrestrial photosynthesis [J].
Badgley, Grayson ;
Field, Christopher B. ;
Berry, Joseph A. .
SCIENCE ADVANCES, 2017, 3 (03)
[6]   Estimation of global GPP from GOME-2 and OCO-2 SIF by considering the dynamic variations of GPP-SIF relationship [J].
Bai, Jia ;
Zhang, Helin ;
Sun, Rui ;
Li, Xing ;
Xiao, Jingfeng ;
Wang, Yan .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2022, 326
[7]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[8]   'Back to the future'? Urban backyards and food self-sufficiency [J].
Burgin, Shelley .
LAND USE POLICY, 2018, 78 :29-35
[9]   Integrating satellite and climate data to predict wheat yield in Australia using machine learning approaches [J].
Cai, Yaping ;
Guan, Kaiyu ;
Lobell, David ;
Potgieter, Andries B. ;
Wang, Shaowen ;
Peng, Jian ;
Xu, Tianfang ;
Asseng, Senthold ;
Zhang, Yongguang ;
You, Liangzhi ;
Peng, Bin .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2019, 274 :144-159
[10]   Integrating Multi-Source Data for Rice Yield Prediction across China using Machine Learning and Deep Learning Approaches [J].
Cao, Juan ;
Zhang, Zhao ;
Tao, Fulu ;
Zhang, Liangliang ;
Luo, Yuchuan ;
Zhang, Jing ;
Han, Jichong ;
Xie, Jun .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2021, 297