Development of drought-tolerant bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties through mutation breeding technique

被引:0
作者
Erkilic, Emine Guelden [1 ]
Guerel, Songul [2 ]
Yildiz, Cigdem [3 ]
Yildiz, Mustafa [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ankara, Grad Sch Biotechnol, Dept Basic Biotechnol, TR-06110 Ankara, Turkiye
[2] Univ Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal, Fac Arts & Sci, Dept Biol, TR-14030 Bolu, Turkiye
[3] Turkish Energy Nucl & Mineral Res Agcy TENMAK, TR-06980 Ankara, Turkiye
[4] Univ Ankara, Fac Agr, Dept Field Crops, TR-06110 Ankara, Turkiye
关键词
Bread wheat; Gamma ray; Drought stress; qRT-PCR; Proline; Chlorophyll; Mutation breeding; PROLINE ACCUMULATION; OSMOTIC ADJUSTMENT; GAMMA-IRRADIATION; WATER RELATIONS; STRESS; CULTIVARS; EXPRESSION; GROWTH; PLANTS; SALT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jrras.2024.101198
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
One of the techniques used to develop drought-tolerant varieties in wheat is mutation breeding. The strong mutant genotypes that emerge in this way create specific responses that provide adaptation to drought. In this study covering the M1 and M2 generation periods, a small number of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) mutant genotypes developed some adaptation mechanisms in response to stress. During M1 generation period, seedlings of Kinaci 97 and Dogu 88 varieties, whose seeds were treated with 0, 200, 300 and 400 Gy gamma rays, were exposed to drought (-1.03 MPa). As mutation dose applied to seeds in both varieties increased, amounts of chlorophyll and other parameters affecting yield of seedlings that developed from these seeds and were exposed to drought decreased, while amounts of proline increased. In terms of drought tolerance and yield, a small number of M1 mutant seeds obtained by 300 Gy mutation application to Kinaci 97 achieved the best performance. Thus, M2 generation period continued through seeds of 19 different mutant ears (mutant genotypes) developed from M1 mutant seeds. Seedlings developing from seeds of these 19 mutant ears were also exposed to the same level of drought. It was observed that proline amounts were lowest, TaMYB, TaMAPK, TaDHN, TaMIP, TaP5CS gene expressions and some yield criteria were highest in study groups 5, 16 and 19. Therefore, according to the data, it was determined that the most drought tolerant groups were 5, 16 and 19.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 104 条
  • [1] METABOLISM OF PROLINE AND THE HYDROXYPROLINES
    ADAMS, E
    FRANK, L
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF BIOCHEMISTRY, 1980, 49 : 1005 - 1061
  • [2] Global impact of mutation-derived varieties
    Ahloowalia, BS
    Maluszynski, M
    Nichterlein, K
    [J]. EUPHYTICA, 2004, 135 (02) : 187 - 204
  • [3] Induced mutations - A new paradigm in plant breeding
    Ahloowalia, BS
    Maluszynski, M
    [J]. EUPHYTICA, 2001, 118 (02) : 167 - 173
  • [4] Akulov A. S., 1986, Nauchno-Tekhnicheskii Byulleten' Vsesoyuznogo Nauchno-Issledovatel'skogo Instituta Zernobobovykh i Krupyanykh Kul'tur, P36
  • [5] Effect of Gamma Radiation on Growth Factors, Biochemical Parameters, and Accumulation of Trace Elements in Soybean Plants (Glycine max L. Merrill)
    Alikamanoglu, Sema
    Yaycili, Orkun
    Sen, Ayse
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL TRACE ELEMENT RESEARCH, 2011, 141 (1-3) : 283 - 293
  • [6] Physiological and molecular studies on ISSR in two wheat cultivars after exposing to gamma radiation
    Aly, Amina A.
    Eliwa, Noha E.
    Maraei, Rabab W.
    [J]. SCIENCEASIA, 2019, 45 (05): : 436 - 445
  • [7] Anjum SA, 2011, AFR J AGR RES, V6, P2026
  • [8] Response of Datura innoxia Linn. to Gamma Rays and Its Impact on Plant Growth and Productivity
    Aref I.M.
    Khan P.R.
    Al Sahli A.A.
    Husen A.
    Ansari M.K.A.
    Mahmooduzzafar
    Iqbal M.
    [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences, 2016, 86 (3) : 623 - 629
  • [10] Development of new high-salt tolerant bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes and insight into the tolerance mechanisms
    Aycan, Murat
    Baslam, Marouane
    Asiloglu, Rasit
    Mitsui, Toshiaki
    Yildiz, Mustafa
    [J]. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY, 2021, 166 : 314 - 327