Improving the timeliness and equity of preschool childhood vaccinations: Mixed methods evaluation of a quality improvement programme in primary care

被引:1
作者
Marszalek, Milena [1 ]
Hawking, Meredith K. D. [1 ]
Gutierrez, Ana [1 ]
Firman, Nicola [1 ]
Wu, Jianhua [1 ]
Robson, John [1 ]
Smith, Kelvin [1 ]
Dostal, Isabel [1 ]
Ahmed, Zaheer [1 ]
Bedford, Helen [2 ]
Billington, Anna [1 ]
Dezateux, Carol [1 ]
机构
[1] Queen Mary Univ London, Wolfson Inst Populat Hlth, Ctr Primary Care, Yvonne Carter Bldg,58 Turner St, London E1 2AB, England
[2] UCL, Great Ormond St Inst Child Hlth, 30 Guilford St, London WC1N 1EH, England
关键词
Primary care; Vaccination; Immunisation; Quality improvement; Health data science; INTERVENTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126522
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: We conducted a mixed methods evaluation to assess whether implementing a primary care quality improvement (QI) programme utilising a digital call-and-recall tool improved timely receipt and equity of first measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) and diphtheria tetanus, pertussis and polio-containing (DTaP /IPV) vaccinations. Methods: 138,133 and 136,952 children were eligible to receive first MMR and DTaP/IPV respectively between 1st January 2019 and 31st January 2024 in North East London. We compared proportions with timely first MMR or DTaP/IPV receipt (by ages 18 and six months respectively) pre- and post-implementation using an interrupted time series analysis. We calculated change in the Slope Index of Inequality (SII) by an area-level deprivation measure. We conducted 'Think Aloud' exercises and semi-structured interviews with users. Findings: The proportion of children with timely first MMR receipt increased by 5.3 % (Rate Ratio [RR]:1.053, 95 % confidence interval [CI]:1.033-1.073), equating to an absolute increase in timely MMR receipt of 4.1 %- from 77.7 % to 81.8 %- and for first DTaP/IPV by 0.9 % (RR:1.009, 95 % CI:1.003-1.015). There was no significant change in SII for either vaccine. Users reported improved recall with tool use, but identified practice-level and systemic barriers, including staff dynamics and unachievable national targets, limiting its consistent use. Interpretation: In a real-world setting, a call-and-recall tool within a primary care QI programme improved timely first MMR receipt. Sustained improvement requires additional support including by incentivising achievable targets and improving staff capacity and training. Funding: National Institute of Health and Care Research; Barts Charity.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Implementation of a Quality Improvement and Clinical Decision Support Tool for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care: Process Evaluation [J].
Chima, Sophie ;
Hunter, Barbara ;
Martinez-Gutierrez, Javiera ;
Lumsden, Natalie ;
Nelson, Craig ;
Boyle, Dougie ;
Somasundaram, Kaleswari ;
Manski-Nankervis, Jo-Anne ;
Emery, Jon .
JMIR CANCER, 2025, 11
[22]   Unpacking the key components of a programme to improve the timeliness of hip-fracture care: a mixed-methods case study [J].
Pamela Mazzocato ;
Maria Unbeck ;
Mattias Elg ;
Olof Gustaf Sköldenberg ;
Johan Thor .
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, 23
[23]   Realist evaluation of a complex integrated care programme: protocol for a mixed methods study [J].
Nurjono, Milawaty ;
Shrestha, Pami ;
Lee, Alice ;
Lim, Xin Ya ;
Shiraz, Farah ;
Tan, Shermin ;
Wong, Shing Hei ;
Foo, Kah Mun ;
Wee, Thomas ;
Toh, Sue-Anne ;
Yoong, Joanne ;
Vrijhoef, Hubertus Johannes Maria .
BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (03)
[24]   Patients' perspectives on the quality of care of a new complex psycho-oncological care programme in Germany - external mixed methods evaluation results [J].
Cecon-Stabel, Natalia ;
Salm, Sandra ;
Pfaff, Holger ;
Dresen, Antje ;
Krieger, Theresia .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2023, 23 (01)
[25]   Improving Quality Improvement Capacity and Clinical Performance in Small Primary Care Practices [J].
Coleman, Katie F. ;
Krakauer, Chloe ;
Anderson, Melissa ;
Michaels, LeAnn ;
Dorr, David A. ;
Fagnan, Lyle J. ;
Hsu, Clarissa ;
Parchman, Michael L. .
ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2021, 19 (06) :499-506
[26]   Improving Postpartum Depression Screening in Pediatric Primary Care: A Quality Improvement Project [J].
Sorg, Margaret ;
Coddington, Jennifer ;
Ahmed, Azza ;
Richards, Elizabeth .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC NURSING-NURSING CARE OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, 2019, 46 :83-88
[27]   Evaluation of the Counterweight Programme for obesity management in primary care: a starting point for continuous improvement [J].
Ross, H. M. ;
Laws, R. ;
Reckless, J. ;
Lean, M. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2008, 58 (553) :548-554
[28]   Validation of quality indicators for evaluating geriatric pharmacotherapy services in primary care: a mixed methods study [J].
Sato, Noriko ;
Fujita, Kenji ;
Okada, Hiroshi ;
Kushida, Kazuki ;
Chen, Timothy F. .
BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (03)
[29]   Enhancing implementation of measurement-based mental health care in primary care: a mixed-methods randomized effectiveness evaluation of implementation facilitation [J].
Wray, Laura O. ;
Ritchie, Mona J. ;
Oslin, David W. ;
Beehler, Gregory P. .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2018, 18
[30]   Provider views on childhood obesity management in primary care settings: a mixed methods analysis [J].
Rhee, Kyung E. ;
Kessl, Stephanie ;
Lindback, Sarah ;
Littman, Marshall ;
El-Kareh, Robert E. .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2018, 18