Factors Associated With Upgrades From Biopsy Gleason Grades 1-3 to Radical Prostatectomy Gleason Grades 4-5 in Prostate Cancer Patients

被引:0
作者
Yu, Le [1 ]
Chen, Kewei [1 ]
Lu, Min [2 ]
Deng, Shaohui [1 ]
Yan, Ye [1 ]
Ye, Jianfei [1 ]
Zhang, Fan [1 ]
Zhang, Shudong [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ Tird Hosp, Dept Urol, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ Tird Hosp, Dept Pathol, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
biopsy; Gleason score; prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy; 2014 INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY; ISUP CONSENSUS CONFERENCE; GRADING SYSTEM; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE; PERINEURAL INVASION; LOCAL TREATMENT; SCORE; CONCORDANCE; DEFINITION; RISK;
D O I
10.1155/ecc/9940460
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: Discordances of Gleason grade (GG) between biopsy and radical prostatectomy (RP) of prostate cancer (PCa) patients have raised great concerns. Our study aimed to identify these predictive factors for GG upgrading from biopsy to RP. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of PCa patients receiving RP in our medical center. All patients underwent a standardized 12-core transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate needle biopsy, with site-specific submissions. Pretreatment PSA-related parameters were assessed 2 weeks before the operation. Prostate volume (PV) was calculated from images. Results: 679 patients were enrolled after screening. In the biopsy GG 1-3 group, 91 patients experienced upgrades. The multivariable analysis revealed that total PSA (tPSA) (p value < 0.01) and perineural invasion (p value = 0.01) were significantly associated with the likelihood of upgrading compared to the concordant group. Conclusion: The GG 4 group demonstrated the lowest rate of concordance between biopsy and RP. Our analysis identified tPSA levels and perineural invasion as independent predictors of GG upgrading from biopsy GG 1-3 to RP GG 4-5 in PCa patients.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   What Are the Predictive Factors for Gleason Score Upgrade following RP? [J].
Alchin, David Rhys ;
Murphy, Declan ;
Lawrentschuk, Nathan .
UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2016, 96 (01) :1-4
[2]   Prostate cancer upgrading or downgrading of biopsy Gleason scores at radical prostatectomy: prediction of "regression to the mean" using routine clinical features with correlating biochemical relapse rates [J].
Altok, Muammer ;
Troncoso, Patricia ;
Achim, Mary F. ;
Matin, Surena F. ;
Gonzalez, Graciela N. ;
Davis, John W. .
ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2019, 21 (06) :598-604
[3]   Global Gleason grade groups in prostate cancer: concordance of biopsy and radical prostatectomy grades and predictors of upgrade and downgrade [J].
Athanazio, Daniel ;
Gotto, Geoffrey ;
Shea-Budgell, Melissa ;
Yilmaz, Asli ;
Trpkov, Kiril .
HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2017, 70 (07) :1098-1106
[4]   Investigating association of perineural invasion on prostate biopsy with Gleason score upgrading at prostatectomy: A multi-institutional analysis [J].
Barsky, Andrew R. ;
Kraus, Ryan D. ;
Carmona, Ruben ;
Santos, Patricia M. G. ;
Li, Carrie ;
Schwartz, Lauren E. ;
Ballas, Leslie K. ;
Vapiwala, Neha .
CANCER MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (10) :3383-3389
[5]   Validation of a contemporary prostate cancer grading system using prostate cancer death as outcome [J].
Berney, Daniel M. ;
Beltran, Luis ;
Fisher, Gabrielle ;
North, Bernard V. ;
Greenberg, David ;
Moller, Henrik ;
Soosay, Geraldine ;
Scardino, Peter ;
Cuzick, Jack .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2016, 114 (10) :1078-1083
[6]   Underestimation of Gleason score at prostate biopsy reflects sampling error in lower volume tumours [J].
Corcoran, Niall M. ;
Hovens, Chris M. ;
Hong, Matthew K. H. ;
Pedersen, John ;
Casey, Rowan G. ;
Connolly, Stephen ;
Peters, Justin ;
Harewood, Laurence ;
Gleave, Martin E. ;
Goldenberg, S. Larry ;
Costello, Anthony J. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 109 (05) :660-664
[7]   The 2019 Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) White Paper on Contemporary Grading of Prostate Cancer [J].
Epstein, Jonathan, I ;
Amin, Mahul B. ;
Fine, Samson W. ;
Algaba, Ferran ;
Aron, Manju ;
Baydar, Dilek E. ;
Beltran, Antonio Lopez ;
Brimo, Fadi ;
Cheville, John C. ;
Colecchia, Maurizio ;
Comperat, Eva ;
da Cunha, Isabela Werneck ;
Delprado, Warick ;
DeMarzo, Angelo M. ;
Giannico, Giovanna A. ;
Gordetsky, Jennifer B. ;
Guo, Charles C. ;
Hansel, Donna E. ;
Hirsch, Michelle S. ;
Huang, Jiaoti ;
Humphrey, Peter A. ;
Jimenez, Rafael E. ;
Khani, Francesca ;
Kong, Qingnuan ;
Kryvenko, Oleksandr N. ;
Kunju, L. Priya ;
Lal, Priti ;
Latour, Mathieu ;
Lotan, Tamara ;
Maclean, Fiona ;
Magi-Galluzzi, Cristina ;
Mehra, Rohit ;
Menon, Santosh ;
Miyamoto, Hiroshi ;
Montironi, Rodolfo ;
Netto, George J. ;
Nguyen, Jane K. ;
Osunkoya, Adeboye O. ;
Parwani, Anil ;
Robinson, Brian D. ;
Rubin, Mark A. ;
Shah, Rajal B. ;
So, Jeffrey S. ;
Takahashi, Hiroyuki ;
Tavora, Fabio ;
Tretiakova, Maria S. ;
True, Lawrence ;
Wobker, Sara E. ;
Yang, Ximing J. ;
Zhou, Ming .
ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2021, 145 (04) :461-493
[8]   The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System [J].
Epstein, Jonathan I. ;
Egevad, Lars ;
Amin, Mahul B. ;
Delahunt, Brett ;
Srigley, John R. ;
Humphrey, Peter A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2016, 40 (02) :244-252
[9]   Upgrading and Downgrading of Prostate Cancer from Biopsy to Radical Prostatectomy: Incidence and Predictive Factors Using the Modified Gleason Grading System and Factoring in Tertiary Grades [J].
Epstein, Jonathan I. ;
Feng, Zhaoyong ;
Trock, Bruce J. ;
Pierorazio, Phillip M. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 61 (05) :1019-1024
[10]   Gleason group concordance between biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens: A cohort study from Prostate Cancer Outcome Registry - Victoria [J].
Evans, Sue M. ;
Bandarage, Varuni Patabendi ;
Kronborg, Caroline ;
Earnest, Arul ;
Millar, Jeremy ;
Clouston, David .
PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 4 (04) :145-151