Magnetic sphincter augmentation vs subtotal gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction for the treatment of postsleeve gastrectomy gastroesophageal reflux disease

被引:0
作者
Jefferies, Rachel S. [1 ]
Ward, Marc A. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Shabbir, Rehma [5 ]
Farias, Daylon A. [1 ]
Ogola, Gerald O. [5 ]
Leeds, Steven G. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Texas Hlth & Sci Ctr, Dept Clin Res Management, Ft Worth, TX USA
[2] Baylor Scott & White Hlth, Ctr Adv Surg, Dept Surg, Dallas, TX 75246 USA
[3] Baylor Univ, Dept Minimally Invas Surg, Med Ctr, Dallas, TX 76706 USA
[4] Texas A&M Sch Med, Dept Surg, College Stn, TX 77807 USA
[5] Baylor Scott & White Hlth, Res Inst, Dept Surg Res, Dallas, TX USA
关键词
Gastroesophageal reflux disease; Magnetic sphincter augmentation; Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; Sleeve gastrectomy; Subtotal gastrectomy; SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY;
D O I
10.1016/j.gassur.2024.07.016
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Obesity affects more than one-third of Americans and can be treated with bariatric surgery, most commonly sleeve gastrectomy (SG). SG has been shown to increase the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in some patients, which can be refractory to medical management. Surgical options for post-SG GERD include magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) and subtotal gastrectomy with Roux-en- Y reconstruction (SGRY). A comparative analysis of MSA and SGRY for post-SG GERD was performed to evaluate postoperative outcomes. Methods: A retrospectively maintained prospectively gathered database from 2018 to 2023 was used to identify patients who underwent MSA or SGRY for the indication of GERD after SG. Differences among patient characteristics; GERD assessments, including the health-related quality of life (HRQL) questionnaire and the reflux symptom index (RSI); and procedure outcomes were collected and analyzed according to surgery type. Results: A total of 92 patients (85 females and 7 males) met the inclusion criteria. The study included 17 patients in the MSA group, 71 patients in the SGRY group, and 4 patients who underwent both procedures. The average preoperative body mass index (BMI) of all patients was 33.3. Compared with patients who underwent MSA, those who underwent SGRY presented with higher BMI (29.4 vs 34.2, respectively; P = .013), preoperative GERD-HRQL (35 vs 52, respectively; P = .046), and RSI (14 vs 28, respectively; P = .017). Postoperatively, patients who underwent SGRY demonstrated a higher decrease in mean postoperative DeMeester score than those who underwent MSA (44.2 vs 13.9, respectively; P = .040), with 22 patients (50%) in the SGRY group vs 10 patients (20%) in the MSA group achieving normalization. Conclusion: Although MSA remains a viable surgical alternative, our study indicated that SGRY can produce better symptom control and decrease acid exposure compared with MSA in patients with post-SG GERD. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract.
引用
收藏
页码:1682 / 1686
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Worldwide Experience with Erosion of the Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation Device
    Alicuben, Evan T.
    Bell, Reginald C. W.
    Jobe, Blair A.
    Buckley, F. P., III
    Smith, C. Daniel
    Graybeal, Casey J.
    Lipham, John C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2018, 22 (08) : 1442 - 1447
  • [2] Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation and Postoperative Dysphagia: Characterization, Clinical Risk Factors, and Management
    Ayazi, Shahin
    Zheng, Ping
    Zaidi, Ali H.
    Chovanec, Kristy
    Chowdhury, Nobel
    Salvitti, Madison
    Komatsu, Yoshihiro
    Omstead, Ashten N.
    Hoppo, Toshitaka
    Jobe, Blair A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2020, 24 (01) : 39 - 49
  • [3] Magnetic Augmentation of the Lower Esophageal Sphincter: Results of a Feasibility Clinical Trial
    Bonavina, Luigi
    Saino, Greta I.
    Bona, Davide
    Lipham, John
    Ganz, Robert A.
    Dunn, Daniel
    DeMeester, Tom
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2008, 12 (12) : 2133 - 2140
  • [4] Volume-outcome relationships for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients in the sleeve gastrectomy era
    Chao, Grace F.
    Yang, Jie
    Thumma, Jyothi
    Chhabra, Karan R.
    Arterburn, David E.
    Ryan, Andrew
    Telem, Dana A.
    Dimick, Justin B.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2022, 36 (06): : 3884 - 3892
  • [5] Conversion of Sleeve Gastrectomy to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Indications, Prevalence, and Safety
    Dang, Jerry T.
    Vaughan, Tiffany
    Mocanu, Valentin
    Mubashir, Hadika
    Barajas-Gamboa, Juan S.
    Codina, Ricard Corcelles
    Rodriguez, John
    Karmali, Shahzeer
    Kroh, Matthew
    [J]. OBESITY SURGERY, 2023, 33 (05) : 1486 - 1493
  • [6] Revisional Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass After Sleeve Gastrectomy for Gastro-esophageal Reflux Disease and or Insufficient Weight-Loss: a Comparative Study
    Destan, Clement
    Baratte, Clement
    Torcivia, Adriana
    Brevart, Christophe
    Malgras, Brice
    Clement, Karine
    Poitou, Christine
    Oppert, Jean-Michel
    Aron-Wisnewsky, Judith
    Genser, Laurent
    [J]. OBESITY SURGERY, 2023, 33 (10) : 3077 - 3089
  • [7] Criteria of patient selection for magnetic sphincter augmentation
    Furay, E.
    Doggett, S.
    Buckley III, F. P.
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2023, 36
  • [8] The bariatric surgery and weight losing: a meta-analysis in the long- and very long-term effects of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy on weight loss in adults
    Golzarand, Mahdieh
    Toolabi, Karamollah
    Farid, Roya
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 31 (11): : 4331 - 4345
  • [9] Magnetic sphincter augmentation as treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease after sleeve gastrectomy
    Grover, Karan
    Khaitan, Leena
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2023, 36
  • [10] Potential mechanisms of sleeve gastrectomy for reducing weight and improving metabolism in patients with obesity
    Huang, Renhong
    Ding, Xusheng
    Fu, Hongbing
    Cai, Qingping
    [J]. SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2019, 15 (10) : 1861 - 1872